Fired After the Charlie Kirk Revenge Purge, They’re Still Unemployed

Read the original at The Intercept ↗
Cite

Washington, J. (2026, September 10). Fired After the Charlie Kirk Revenge Purge, They’re Still Unemployed. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2026/09/10/charlie-kirk-fired-censorship-free-speech/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Intercept · collected 2026-09-10 · by Jessica Washington

Quick Summary

Emily Taylor, a former tenured English professor at Presbyterian College in South Carolina, resigned from her position after facing threats from lawmakers who accused the college of not upholding conservative values following an essay she wrote about Charlie Kirk’s violent rhetoric before his assassination. Taylor is among over 600 individuals affected by a wave of firings and job losses triggered by political backlash coordinated through social media campaigns, described as one of the largest mass censorship efforts in modern history. The article highlights how these events have led to an erosion of free speech protections for those perceived as critical of right-wing figures like Kirk, with many still unemployed despite losing their jobs due to this political purge.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On September 10, 2025, conservative commentator Charlie Kirk was fatally shot during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University. The incident galvanized opposing political factions: while many called for de-escalation and unity, some radicalized further. Utah Governor Spencer Cox emerged as a voice of moderation, advocating for less polarized politics. In the aftermath, dozens were fired or terminated from various sectors including education, media, and corporate jobs over perceived insensitivity to Kirk’s death. This purge included professors like Emily Taylor who faced backlash for discussing controversial aspects of Kirk's rhetoric, highlighting broader issues around free speech and political correctness in America.

Written for “Charlie Kirk Aftermath” on 2026-10-25, grounded in this article and the 12 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Charlie Kirk Aftermath
Politics · 13 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 30 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe the shooting death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 20
“Both articles describe the shooting death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University and its aftermath.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 18% hedged 6 of 33 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles describe the one-year anniversary of Charlie Kirk's death and its impact on Turning Point USA”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles describe the shooting of Charlie Kirk in January 2026 at Utah Valley University, with Article A describing its aftermath and impact on Emily Taylor, while Article B discusses it as a terrorist attack and Charlie Kirk's character.”
Times of India
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 5% hedged 2 of 43 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A focuses on criticism of Candace Owens' discussion of Charlie Kirk's death, while Article B discusses the aftermath and personal impact of the shooting, indicating different aspects of the same incident but not the same specific event”
The Free Press
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 20 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article B describes the aftermath and impact of the shooting, while Article A is an interview with Spencer Cox about his response to it”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
144
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
4 of 144 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
97/100
The Intercept's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
13
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · source text last changed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Intercept · 126 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Jessica Washington
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The ICE-watchers-turned-poll-watchers are preparing for the worst despite a temporary win the voting rights movement secured last week, when the Supreme Court upheld a decision to block a Trump administration rule that would have let the U.S. Postal Service refuse to deliver ballots from states that don’t share their voter rolls with the federal government, among other new constraints, which advocates warned would lead to chaos and uncounted votes.
🔮 Less sophisticated users could simply search the name “Charlie Kirk” on X and harass anyone who made a negative post.
Also by Jessica Washington
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Intercept Presbyterian College South Carolina Utah Valley University the Trump administration

Subjects

Kirk PERSON · 11× Taylor PERSON · 4× Charlie Kirk PERSON · 2× Emily Taylor PERSON · 1× Intercept ORG · 1× Presbyterian College ORG · 1× South Carolina GPE · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× Utah Valley University ORG · 1× the Trump administration ORG · 1×

Narrative

“One of the things that was really interesting and very destructive about the post-Charlie Kirk purge was how coordinated and manufactured the outrage was,” said Allen Chaney, who serves as legal director of the ACLU of South Carolina and represents both Taylor and fired Clemson University professor Joshua Bregy, who was reinstated in January.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-10
🔮 Less sophisticated users could simply search the name “Charlie Kirk” on X and harass anyone who made a negative post.
2026-09-16 · The Intercept
Fired After the Charlie Kirk Revenge Purge, They’re Still Unemployed · assertive framing

Claims (144 extracted, 4 hedged)

The grief Emily Taylor had been holding at bay finally washed over her in January. asserted
Taylor → hold → January
It had been four months since a lone gunman shot Charlie Kirk in the throat at Utah Valley University, killing the conservative commentator in minutes. asserted
gunman → shoot → minutes
That winter “was the first time in my entire life that I didn’t go back to school,” said the former English professor, holding back tears. asserted
professor → go → tears
Taylor had resigned from her tenured position in December to save her tiny college in South Carolina from a political witch hunt in which lawmakers threatened to pull her school’s funding because she’d written a brief essay acknowledging that before his violent death, Kirk had employed violent rhetoric. asserted
Kirk → resign → rhetoric
“I was a first-generation college student, and I worked my entire life to be an English professor,” said Taylor, who has spent most of the last year scrolling bare job boards since leaving Presbyterian College. asserted
who → work → College
“The chances that I ever have tenure-track employment again doesn’t seem likely.” asserted
I → seem → employment
She’s one of the more than 600 people who had their lives upended in the wake of Kirk’s assassination, when a free-speech crackdown led by the Trump administration sought revenge on anyone critical of the deceased far-right podcaster. asserted
crackdown → ’ → podcaster
A year after Kirk’s killing, The Intercept spoke with five people who lost their jobs in the wake of the Kirk firings and four attorneys representing seven more clients, most of whom are still not back at work after finding themselves ensnared in one of the biggest mass censorship campaigns in modern history. asserted
themselves → speak → history
Their stories represent a chilling sea change that has become a hallmark of the second Trump administration: an inversion of the assumption that, for the most part, Americans are protected by their right to free speech. asserted
Americans → represent → speech
They illustrate what happens when an overzealous online army propped up by some of the most powerful people in the country are given free rein to terrorize their perceived political enemies. asserted
army → illustrate → enemies
“One of the things that was really interesting and very destructive about the post-Charlie Kirk purge was how coordinated and manufactured the outrage was,” said Allen Chaney, who serves as legal director of the ACLU of South Carolina and represents both Taylor and fired Clemson University professor Joshua Bregy, who was reinstated in January. asserted
who → say → January
While the U.S. has suffered speech crackdowns before — like in the McCarthy and post-9/11 eras — the saturation of online life seems made to supercharge a backlash. asserted
saturation → suffer → backlash
“I don’t think any other era has had the tools to do the sort of purging that is available now,” said Chaney. asserted
Chaney → think → purging
Taylor was waiting for her children to finish their piano lessons on September 10, 2025, when she heard the news that Kirk was shot while answering a question about a conspiracy theory he perpetuated suggesting there is an epidemic of transgender mass shooters. asserted
he → wait → shooters
“Counting or not counting gang violence?” were his final words. asserted
Counting → count → violence
President Donald Trump called Kirk “our greatest evangelist for American liberty” to a packed crowd at his memorial service. asserted
Trump → call → service
And Vice President JD Vance said anyone perceived to be “celebrating” Kirk’s murder should be targeted. asserted
anyone → say → murder
“When you see someone celebrating Charlie’s murder, call them out,” Vance said on his podcast. asserted
Vance → see → podcast
Online troll accounts and politicians alike took up the cause to begin targeting anyone even mildly critical of Kirk. asserted
accounts → take → Kirk
Lists circulated naming people accused of “celebrating” Kirk’s death, making it easy to harass people en masse. asserted
it → circulate → masse
Less sophisticated users could simply search the name “Charlie Kirk” on X and harass anyone who made a negative post. uncertain
who → search → post
Big accounts like Libs of TikTok doxed critics and amplified hate to their millions of followers. asserted
accounts → doxe → followers
Jimmy Kimmel’s show was temporarily pulled off the air by ABC, after the host quipped in a monologue that MAGA was weaponizing Kirk’s death. asserted
MAGA → pull → death
Washington Post opinion columnist Karen Attiah was fired for pointing out Kirk’s deep anti-Blackness. asserted
Attiah → fire → Blackness
Kimmel is back on, and Attiah was recently reinstated by an arbitrator. asserted
Attiah → reinstate → arbitrator
But most of the people who were targeted, doxed, fired, and harassed were not public figures. asserted
who → target → people
“My clients really were not high-income earners; we’re talking about support staff,” said Melody Fowler-Green, an attorney who represents several people fired in the wake of the Kirk killing. asserted
who → talk → killing
“A lot of the people who lost their jobs, they are people who are not in positions of power.” asserted
who → lose → power
Kimberly Hunt, then a 31-year-old HR professional from Scottsdale Arizona, made a short video questioning the assertion that Kirk “didn’t deserve” his fate. asserted
Kirk → make → fate
“He said a few deaths a year are worth it if it meant preserving our God-given right to bear arms. asserted
it → say → arms
He actively fought against women’s rights. asserted
He → fight → rights
He’s openly Islamophobic, and he spreads anti-trans rhetoric,” Hunt said into the camera, accurately capturing Kirk’s rhetoric. asserted
Hunt → ’ → rhetoric
“How many hate crimes happened because of him? asserted
crimes → happen → him
Spare me the empathy because he didn’t believe in it either.” asserted
he → spare → it
She said she had sympathy for his children but not his wife, Erika, who is now the CEO of his organization Turning Point USA. asserted
who → say → organization
Hunt said she never listed her job on her social media, but internet sleuths found where she worked, and the phones began to ring off the hook. asserted
phones → say → hook
When her boss asked her to meet, she knew the writing was on the wall. asserted
writing → ask → wall
“He explained that I had put him in a tough position because there were so many phone calls coming into our business that it was disrupting their operations,” she recalled, “And that he had to let me go.” asserted
me → explain → operations
The harassment didn’t stop. asserted
harassment → stop → ?
Hunt said at one point she received a call from her local sheriff that she was said to be on a “hit list.” asserted
she → say → list
…and 104 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support