Photo via Daily Mail

CLARE FOGES: The warning I'll be giving my daughters about consent after Russell Brand's conviction

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Foges, C. (2026, November 12). CLARE FOGES: The warning I'll be giving my daughters about consent after Russell Brand's conviction. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/lifestyle/family-parenting/article-16285503/CLARE-FOGES-warning-Ill-giving-daughters-consent-Russell-Brands-conviction.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-11-12 · by Clare Foges analysis

Quick Summary

Clare Foges writes about the implications of Russell Brand's conviction for rape on how she will advise her daughters about consent. Brand is serving a ten-and-a-half-year sentence at HMP Wandsworth for forcibly raping a woman after consensual sexual acts. While the law clearly states that previous sexual history does not establish consent, Foges argues that in practice, some men may still misunderstand or ignore this principle when drunk and aroused. She warns young women to be cautious about engaging in sex with men they don't know well to minimize their risk of assault.
Written by AI on 2026-11-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Russell Brand is serving most of his ten-and-a-half-year sentence at HMP Wandsworth for anal rape, following his conviction under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The victim was forced to perform oral sex on him during a night out and later agreed to vaginal sex at his house before he raped her anally, causing significant pain and trauma. She was also told to clean up after the assault. Despite the legal clarity that previous consensual acts do not establish consent for subsequent non-consensual ones, some fear this high-profile case might mislead young women into thinking they have more control over their safety during sexual encounters than is realistic. Clare Foges warns her daughters about the complexities of consent in light of Brand's conviction and sentence.

Written for “Russell Brand's Consent Conviction Warning” on 2026-11-13, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 13 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss Russell Brand's conviction and sentencing for sexual assault, Article A focuses on the investigative journalism behind the case and the testimonies given during the trial, while Article B reflects on the personal impact of the crime and discusses the details of the rape. They do not describe the same specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the victim's testimony and her experience after the assault, while Article B discusses broader implications of the conviction and includes details about both consensual acts and non-consensual acts, but does not focus on the same specific incident described in Article A.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes the reaction to a defense barrister's statements during Russell Brand's trial, while Article B discusses the aftermath of his conviction and sentencing.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 3 of 73 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss Russell Brand's rape conviction and its aftermath but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 28 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes the court proceedings and a victim's statement, while Article B provides commentary on the broader implications of Russell Brand's conviction and details about the assault. They are related but describe different aspects of the incident.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 4 of 42 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss Russell Brand's rape and sexual assault conviction, Article B focuses more on the details of the crime and its impact rather than reporting the sentencing which is the main focus of Article A.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 3 of 15 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A focuses on criticism of Russell Brand's barrister for his remarks during sentencing, while Article B discusses the details and aftermath of Brand's conviction and rape case.”
The Daily Wire
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 26 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Russell Brand's conviction and do not describe the same specific incident or time frame.”
The Daily Wire
Leans right further left than this Hedges 46 of 343 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Russell Brand's conviction and sentencing for rape and sexual assault, they do not describe the exact same incident or time period. Article A focuses on the immediate aftermath of the sentencing, while Article B discusses details from the trial and its broader implications.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 27 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes a victim's statement during Russell Brand's trial, while Article B discusses the aftermath of his conviction and sentencing.”

Story

Russell Brand's Consent Conviction Warning
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
71
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
4 of 71 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 10847 article(s) · 24 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 24 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Clare Foges
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
And I fear that the high-profile nature of this case may lead some young women to feel a false sense of empowerment.
Yes, if you talk about the ‘societal conditioning of women’, you sound like someone who would blame getting a parking ticket on ‘the patriarchy’.
Also by Clare Foges
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

The Sexual Offences Act 2003

Subjects

Brand PERSON · 3× Russell Brand PERSON · 2× Clare Foges PERSON · 1×

Narrative

But do we serve young women by pretending that every aroused man while engaged in the act of sex is always going to respect your legal right to withdraw consent at any time? Or that those who have had their sexual drives addled by years of watching violent hardcore pornography are going to continually seek a woman’s consent?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-12
And I fear that the high-profile nature of this case may lead some young women to feel a false sense of empowerment.

Claims (71 extracted, 4 hedged)

Though Russell Brand now sits in a cell at HMP Wandsworth, dandy waistcoats swapped for a prison-issue grey tracksuit, the reverberations from his case continue. asserted
reverberations → sit → case
Most of us now know the grim details about the anal rape for which he is serving most of his ten-and-a-half-year sentence. asserted
he → know → sentence
The way he flipped the woman over, tore off his condom and forced himself on her, causing immense pain. asserted
he → flip → pain
We know that she was told, horribly, to ‘clear up the mess’ left by the act. asserted
she → know → act
We know it has caused her years of suffering. asserted
it → know → suffering
We heard, too, about the consensual acts the woman had engaged in. asserted
woman → hear → acts
After meeting Brand on a night out she and a friend had performed oral sex on him. asserted
she → meet → him
Days later she went to his house and agreed to vaginal sex before the rape happened. asserted
rape → go → sex
Many have lauded the Brand verdict as a watershed moment, making clear once and for all that a woman’s behaviour prior to a sex assault is irrelevant. asserted
behaviour → laud → assault
And it is, according to the law. uncertain
it → accord → law
The Sexual Offences Act 2003 makes clear that consent means agreeing by choice, with the freedom and capacity to make that choice. asserted
means → make → choice
A woman can have consensual sex with a man and refuse a different sexual act. asserted
woman → have → act
Her previous sexual history does not establish consent. asserted
history → establish → consent
She can say no at any time – including during sex. asserted
She → say → sex
This is how consent is viewed in the eyes of the law. asserted
consent → view → law
But let us be frank. asserted
us → let → ?
The eyes of the law are different from the eyes of some men – especially when drunk and aroused. asserted
eyes → arouse → men
And I fear that the high-profile nature of this case may lead some young women to feel a false sense of empowerment. uncertain
nature → fear → empowerment
To believe that – just as the jury correctly respected the victim’s right to say no at any time – so will any potential sexual partner. asserted
partner → believe → time
This will lead them into dangerous situations. asserted
This → lead → situations
Many have lauded the Russell Brand verdict as a watershed moment, making clear once and for all that a woman’s behaviour prior to a sex assault is irrelevant, writes Clare Foges I can hear the thunder of a thousand fingers tapping out furious responses on social media: You’re blaming the victims! asserted
You → laud → victims
No, no, I am stating the bleeding obvious, which is that where women can minimise their risk of being assaulted – such as not engaging in sex acts with a man they don’t know well or going home with them – they should do so. asserted
they → state → them
We minimise the risk of fraud by not giving out our bank details. asserted
We → minimise → details
We minimise the risk of theft with locks and alarms. asserted
We → minimise → locks
And we must minimise the risk of sexual assault by being aware that there are men like Brand who see women as objects to be used. asserted
who → minimise → objects
Given that most sex attacks are perpetrated by someone the victim knows, you cannot eliminate risk but you can minimise it. asserted
you → give → it
This is not a suggestion that those who do go home with a man or indeed start having sex with him are ‘asking for it’ if things turn nasty and a consensual act turns into an attack. asserted
act → go → attack
The blame always, solely and squarely, lies with the perpetrator. asserted
blame → lie → perpetrator
The victim bears not one iota of blame. asserted
victim → bear → blame
But do we serve young women by pretending that every aroused man while engaged in the act of sex is always going to respect your legal right to withdraw consent at any time? Or that those who have had their sexual drives addled by years of watching violent hardcore pornography are going to continually seek a woman’s consent? asserted
drives → serve → consent
This is not in any way to excuse their behaviour. asserted
This → excuse → behaviour
It shouldn’t be the case that ‘no’ doesn’t always work. asserted
no → work → ?
It is disgusting that ‘no’ sometimes doesn’t work. asserted
no → work → ?
But what I will be instructing my own daughters when they are older is this: please do not put yourself in a position of danger in the first place. asserted
they → instruct → place
Yes, flirt, wear what you want, have a few drinks, have fun. asserted
you → flirt → fun
But if you are intending to go home with a man who is not well known to you, be aware that your ‘no’ may not have the power you think it has. uncertain
it → intend → power
Indeed I will be telling them to never, ever go home with a man they don’t know well. asserted
they → tell → man
Of course keeping yourself safe is easier said than done. asserted
keeping → keep → yourself
Men you do know well can also be predators. asserted
you → know → ?
It’s sadly impossible to eliminate risk altogether but the point is to take sensible measures when you can. asserted
you → ’ → measures
…and 31 more, not listed.
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support