Photo via New York Post

Pete Hegseth’s success draws Democrats’ impeachment fire

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Harsanyi, D. (2026, November 11). Pete Hegseth’s success draws Democrats’ impeachment fire. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/11/opinion/pete-hegseths-success-draws-democrats-impeachment-fire/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-11 · by David Harsanyi

Quick Summary

Democrats are considering impeaching Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of War, in 2027 as a way to appease their base without alienating independents. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries supports this move, citing Hegseth's incompetence and unpopularity. However, critics argue that such an impeachment would be politically motivated, given similar issues with former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin were overlooked by Democrats. Despite concerns over his qualifications, Hegseth is credited with successful military operations in Iran and Venezuela, as well as improvements in military recruitment and cultural policies within the armed forces.
Written by AI on 2026-11-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Democrats are increasingly pushing to impeach Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense under President Trump, rather than targeting Trump himself for a third impeachment. This shift is seen as politically safer and more appealing to independents. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries supports impeaching Hegseth, citing him as one of the most incompetent defense secretaries in history. Democrats argue that targeting Hegseth would distract from their focus on economic issues while appeasing partisan demands for accountability. However, some critics point out that under President Biden, Lloyd Austin also faced scrutiny for disappearing without notice and overseeing a chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan that resulted in the deaths of 13 American service members.

Written for “Pete Hegseth Draws Impeachment Fire” on 2026-11-13, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
Hedges 4 of 47 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses an expected impeachment vote in Congress, while Article B discusses the political strategy behind choosing to impeach Pete Hegseth over other options.”
The Bulwark
Leans strongly left Hedges 11 of 88 claims
“The articles discuss different phases and contexts related to Pete Hegseth's potential impeachment, not a single specific incident.”
NBC News
Outlet record 77/100
“While both articles discuss impeachment efforts against Pete Hegseth, they describe different phases or aspects of this broader issue rather than a single specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A describes Pete Hegseth's press conference where he rebukes critics about impeachment charges, while Article B discusses Democrats' strategic reasoning for targeting Hegseth for impeachment.”
New York Post
Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and perspectives on potential impeachment proceedings against Pete Hegseth, but they do not describe the exact same incident happening at the same time.”
The Daily Caller
Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 53 claims Outlet record 92/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the situation involving Pete Hegseth, one focusing on the House voting to block an impeachment effort and the other predicting Democrats will pursue impeaching him in January.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 29 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses the potential for impeaching Pete Hegseth due to his unpopularity, while Article B reports on Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed calling for Hegseth's resignation after an impeachment effort has already failed. These are different phases of related political actions.”
Semafor
Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different perspectives on the impeachment of Pete Hegseth, with one supporting it and the other cautioning against it, indicating they are discussing different phases or stances within the broader issue rather than the same specific event.”
Washington Examiner
Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss the potential impeachment of Pete Hegseth instead of Donald Trump, they are opinion pieces and do not describe a single specific event or incident.”
The Daily Wire
Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the situation involving Pete Hegseth and impeachment calls, with Article A focusing on a press briefing where he responds to such calls, while Article B discusses the political strategy behind targeting him for impeachment.”

Story

Pete Hegseth Draws Impeachment Fire
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 19458 article(s) · 39 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 39 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David Harsanyi
19 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Another prosecution of the president, in the year of “affordability,” would only make Democrats look distracted by petty partisan politics and personal vendettas, rousing independent anger.
Another prosecution of the president in the year of “affordability” would only make Democrats look distracted by petty partisan politics and personal vendettas, rousing anger among independents.
2026-11-11 · assertive framing · Pete Hegseth doesn’t deserve to be impeached
No matter how unhinged, malevolent, or un-American a candidate, even moderate Democrats will rationalize their support by contending they are saving the republic from Donald Trump.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order
President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that the United States will end its $3.8 billion in annual aid to Israel by the end of 2026.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · What will Israel haters whine about now?
There’s a reason El-Sayed wouldn’t condemn the terrorist Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps when asked by a college student during a Michigan town hall not long ago.
A number of things could happen.
Because such a significant percentage of its budget is dedicated to keeping the welfare state operational, any reforms aimed at reducing spending or debt will be greeted with immediate social turmoil.
The number of available job openings that month would hit an all-time high of 7.6 million.
Every time Republicans threaten to cut federal jobs, though they rarely follow through, Democrats predict that society will be plunged into chaos and high unemployment.
The New York Times could not have known all the details at the time, but it immediately downplayed the potential terrorist angle.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · The New York Times’s 80-year crusade against Israel
Also by David Harsanyi
Pete Hegseth doesn’t deserve to be impeached
2026-11-11 · Washington Examiner
Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
What will Israel haters whine about now?
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by David Harsanyi →

Topics

Congress Democrats House Iranian the United States

Subjects

Hegseth PERSON · 6× Congress ORG · 3× Democrats NORP · 3× House ORG · 3× Iranian NORP · 3× Jeffries PERSON · 3× Biden PERSON · 2× Lloyd Austin PERSON · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× the United States GPE · 2×

Narrative

Jeffries has apparently forgotten that Joe Biden’s highly qualified Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin not only disappeared for weeks at a time without informing Congress (or anyone noticing), but also oversaw the chaotic and inept withdrawal from Afghanistan — in which a suicide bomber murdered 13 American service members.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-12
Another prosecution of the president, in the year of “affordability,” would only make Democrats look distracted by petty partisan politics and personal vendettas, rousing independent anger.
2026-11-12 · New York Post
Pete Hegseth’s success draws Democrats’ impeachment fire · assertive framing

Claims (32 extracted, 0 hedged)

Democrats need a scalp. asserted
Democrats → need → scalp
And that scalp is almost surely going to belong to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. asserted
scalp → go → Hegseth
Impeaching President Trump for the third time holds far too many political risks with no corresponding upside. asserted
Impeaching → impeach → upside
Another prosecution of the president, in the year of “affordability,” would only make Democrats look distracted by petty partisan politics and personal vendettas, rousing independent anger. asserted
Democrats → make → anger
His impeachment would satiate some partisan bloodlust without ticking off independents. asserted
impeachment → satiate → independents
Most polling finds Hegseth is the least popular member of Trump’s cabinet. asserted
Hegseth → find → cabinet
It’s no more complicated than that. asserted
It → ’ → that
This is why House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is a “hard yes” on impeaching Hegseth in 2027, describing him as one of the most incompetent and unqualified defense secretaries in history. asserted
Jeffries → impeach → history
Jeffries has apparently forgotten that Joe Biden’s highly qualified Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin not only disappeared for weeks at a time without informing Congress (or anyone noticing), but also oversaw the chaotic and inept withdrawal from Afghanistan — in which a suicide bomber murdered 13 American service members. asserted
bomber → forget → members
Jeffries publicly defended Austin after his disappearances, in case you think the impeachment plan is anything but partisan. asserted
plan → defend → case
Though I’m skeptical Hegseth was the best person for the job, he’s proven to be a lot more capable than Lloyd Austin. asserted
he → ’m → Austin
Support it or not, the initial military phase of the Iran war was extraordinarily successful, one of the most dominant military displays of precision and power in our history. asserted
phase → support → history
Within days the United States, with the help of Israel, had control of Iranian air, decapitated Iranian leadership, destroyed the Iranian navy and severely degraded the terror state’s ability to conduct regional warfare. And it was all done with very few casualties. asserted
it → have → casualties
The war’s fits and starts and failed negotiations were all political decisions. asserted
fits → fail → ?
Then there was Operation Absolute, in which special forces bypassed Venezuelan air defenses and ground forces and, in around two and a half hours, captured communist dictator Nicolás Maduro and his wife, then transported them to New York City to face drug-trafficking indictments. asserted
forces → be → indictments
Hegseth also cleansed the military of a lot of the trendy progressive cultural quackery that sprouted up in the woke era (and perhaps will re-sprout soon enough.) asserted
that → cleanse → era
Meanwhile all five active-duty branches exceeded enrollment targets last year. asserted
branches → exceed → targets
Congress, of course, can impeach anyone it likes for any reason it conjures up — or, for that matter, no good reason at all. asserted
it → impeach → matter
In his failed articles of impeachment this week, Republican House member and crank Tom Massie accused the secretary of war of contravening the War Powers resolution. asserted
member → fail → resolution
This is almost surely going to be one of the indictments used by Democrats, as well. asserted
This → go → Democrats
Perhaps Massie is unaware that the president of the United States, not his cabinet, is charged with obtaining Congress’ consent for war. asserted
president → charge → war
If contravening that resolution was an impeachable offense, secretaries of defense under Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama should have been impeached, as well. asserted
secretaries → contravene → Reagan
There’s certainly a far better case to be made for impeaching presidents who ignore the Constitution than cabinet members. asserted
who → ’ → members
The House Republicans’ impeachment of Biden’s Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, for example, was based on his “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law.” asserted
impeachment → base → law
Which is substantively true — but Mayorkas was merely following the policy decisions of the duly elected president. asserted
Mayorkas → follow → president
Impeachment of a cabinet member changed nothing. asserted
Impeachment → change → nothing
Even if Mayorkas had been removed by the Senate, Biden’s policies would have remained. asserted
policies → remove → Senate
Impeachment has become political Kabuki theater. asserted
Impeachment → become → ?
And these performative impeachments do nothing but degrade another important constitutional process. asserted
impeachments → do → process
You can dislike Hegseth. asserted
You → dislike → Hegseth
You can believe he’s terrible at his job. asserted
he → believe → job
But he’s done nothing to deserve impeachment. asserted
he → do → impeachment
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support