Photo via Washington Examiner

Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Harsanyi, D. (2026, November 3). Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/4789292/democrats-want-to-destroy-constitutional-order/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-03 · by David Harsanyi

Quick Summary

This article argues that Democratic support for certain candidates, even when those candidates are controversial or extreme, stems from a perceived need to protect democracy and the U.S. Constitution against threats posed by President Donald Trump. The author criticizes this stance as hypocritical, suggesting that Democrats have themselves undermined constitutional principles in ways that will persist beyond Trump’s presidency. Representative Haley Stevens faced severe criticism within her party for endorsing Republican Mike Rogers over fellow Democrat Abdul el Sayed, highlighting internal Democratic pressure to align with a singular ideological narrative.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 3, 2026, Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) unexpectedly endorsed Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers, just days before the midterm elections, in a dramatic shift from her previous support for Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed. This move followed months of public feuds between Stevens and El-Sayed over their differing stances on issues such as Israel. With the endorsement, some Democrats are considering expelling Stevens from the party due to caucus rules against supporting opposing-party candidates. The controversy has heightened tensions within Michigan's Democratic Party ahead of the critical Senate race.

Written for “Haley Stevens Endorsement Controversy” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 144 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 126414 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 Haley Stevens Endorsement Controversy
Politics · 145 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 59/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A reports on Haley Stevens endorsing Mike Rogers and attending church with him, while Article B discusses broader Democratic reactions to political endorsements in a more opinionated context.”
The Guardian
Hedges 1 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Haley Stevens' endorsement of Mike Rogers, Article B shifts to broader commentary on Democratic politics and includes additional context not aligned with a single specific incident.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 96/100
“While both articles discuss Haley Stevens endorsing Mike Rogers over Abdul El-Sayed, Article B expands on a broader critique of Democrats and includes commentary from Bruce Springsteen that is not present in or directly relevant to the specific event described in Article A.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 2 of 38 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Rep. Haley Stevens' endorsement of Republican Mike Rogers over Abdul El-Sayed, Article B appears to be a broader commentary on Democratic Party dynamics rather than reporting the specific event itself.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 51 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss Haley Stevens' endorsement of Mike Rogers, Article B is more about the broader political reaction and context rather than focusing on the specific interview incident described in Article A.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss Rep. Haley Stevens' endorsement of Mike Rogers over Abdul el Sayed, Article B shifts focus to a broader critique of Democratic Party support for el Sayed and includes additional context about Bruce Springsteen's endorsement, indicating different emphases and details.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss similar contexts but describe different aspects: Article A focuses on Stevens' endorsement withdrawal, while Article B discusses broader Democratic Party dynamics and Springsteen's endorsement.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A describes Haley Stevens endorsing Mike Rogers, while Article B comments on the broader implications and reactions to Stevens' endorsement rather than the event itself.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
5
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 5 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
145
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4049 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David Harsanyi
16 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 No matter how unhinged, malevolent, or un-American a candidate, even moderate Democrats will rationalize their support by contending they are saving the republic from Donald Trump.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order
🔮 President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that the United States will end its $3.8 billion in annual aid to Israel by the end of 2026.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · What will Israel haters whine about now?
🔮 There’s a reason El-Sayed wouldn’t condemn the terrorist Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps when asked by a college student during a Michigan town hall not long ago.
🔮 A number of things could happen.
🔮 Because such a significant percentage of its budget is dedicated to keeping the welfare state operational, any reforms aimed at reducing spending or debt will be greeted with immediate social turmoil.
🔮 The number of available job openings that month would hit an all-time high of 7.6 million.
🔮 Every time Republicans threaten to cut federal jobs, though they rarely follow through, Democrats predict that society will be plunged into chaos and high unemployment.
🔮 The New York Times could not have known all the details at the time, but it immediately downplayed the potential terrorist angle.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · The New York Times’s 80-year crusade against Israel
🔮 Would he now renounce those who held vigils supporting the mass murderer Ayatollah Ali Khamenei?
🔮 Would he now renounce those who held vigils supporting the mass murderer Ayatollah Ali Khamenei?
Also by David Harsanyi
What will Israel haters whine about now?
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
Of course el Sayed is on the side of the terrorists
2026-10-30 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by David Harsanyi →

Topics

American Democrat Democrats Republican

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 4× el Sayed PERSON · 2× Abdul el Sayed PERSON · 1× American NORP · 1× Bruce Springsteen PERSON · 1× Democrat NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Haley Stevens PERSON · 1× Mike Rogers PERSON · 1× Republican NORP · 1×

Narrative

Even if we granted every accusation about Trump was true, it would not change the fact that Democrats have embraced unwinding the constitutional order in ways that will far outlast any one politician.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 No matter how unhinged, malevolent, or un-American a candidate, even moderate Democrats will rationalize their support by contending they are saving the republic from Donald Trump.
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order · assertive framing

Claims (5 extracted, 0 hedged)

When Rep. Haley Stevens endorsed Republican Mike Rogers over fellow Democrat Abdul el Sayed, she was immediately cast out, an apostate of the one true faith. asserted
she → endorse → faith
It wasn’t just about el Sayed, Democrats argued. asserted
Democrats → argue → Sayed
No matter how unhinged, malevolent, or un-American a candidate, even moderate Democrats will rationalize their support by contending they are saving the republic from Donald Trump. asserted
they → rationalize → Trump
In his endorsement, Bruce Springsteen preposterously referred to el Sayed as a “fighter for our American Constitution.” asserted
Springsteen → refer → Constitution
Even if we granted every accusation about Trump was true, it would not change the fact that Democrats have embraced unwinding the constitutional order in ways that will far outlast any one politician. asserted
that → grant → politician
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support