Photo via Washington Examiner

First Circuit weighs Trump bid to gut trio of government agencies

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Birle, J. (2026, September 16). First Circuit weighs Trump bid to gut trio of government agencies. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4729490/first-circuit-trump-government-agencies-cutting/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-16 · by Jack Birle

Quick Summary

On Wednesday, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit heard arguments challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order from March 2025 that reduced staffing and grants at three government agencies to minimum levels mandated by law. The Justice Department defended the order, while attorneys representing Democrat-led states argued it unlawfully closed down these congressionally established agencies by firing most of their staff and halting services. The panel did not provide a timeline for its decision but has historically ruled against such broad executive actions from previous administrations.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In March 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order significantly reducing several federal agencies, including the Minority Business and Development Agency, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, and the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, to their legally mandated minimum staffing levels. This move was challenged by a coalition of Democrat-led states, leading a federal district court judge to rule that the executive order was unlawful. On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit heard arguments from the Justice Department and the Democratic state coalition as the Trump administration sought to overturn this ruling. Deputy solicitor general Ester Murdukhayeva argued that the administration had effectively shut down these agencies by firing nearly all staff, citing previous rulings against sweeping executive orders. The court did not indicate when or how it would rule on the case.

Written for “Trump Legal Challenge Against Agencies” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Legal Challenge Against Agencies
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 33 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different events: one focuses on Trump's criticism of Supreme Court Justices, while the other covers a federal appeals court hearing regarding Trump's attempt to gut government agencies.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 51 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different legal actions taken against the Trump administration: one regarding federal agencies and another about immigration rules.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different executive orders from Trump's administration affecting distinct government agencies or funding areas.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss two different court cases involving distinct policies from the Trump administration.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss two distinct court cases involving different policies and agencies.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different court cases involving distinct policy areas and executive actions by the Trump administration.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
16
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
1 of 16 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3864 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jack Birle
34 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 As same-day voters go to the polls for the midterm elections next week, the Supreme Court will hear a major religious liberty case over a Colorado universal preschool program with implications beyond the Centennial State.
🔮 A trio of cases involving property rights and personal freedoms set to be argued this term illustrates the role of the Supreme Court as the last line of defense for people fighting what they see as government overreach.
🔮 The Supreme Court will hear a pair of cases over the legality of sweeping “assault weapons” bans later this year, and the local governments at the center of the lawsuits are urging the high court this week to let them ban the firearms they claim are responsible for the “most tragic and frightening crimes.”
🔮 The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a loss on its emergency docket on Wednesday, declining to lift a lower court’s block on a new regulation for federal prisons that would stop providing inmates with transgender surgeries and procedures.
🔮 The high court announced in an order list that because they lacked a quorum in BMG Rights Management v. Vetter, the lower court’s ruling would be affirmed as if the justices never took up the case, the same way that a deadlock at the Supreme Court would affirm a lower court’s ruling.
🔮 The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear a challenge to a federal law barring the distilling of alcohol at home, weighing whether it oversteps the federal government’s powers.
🔮 Justice Samuel Alito began his 22nd Supreme Court term last week, but even as he insists he will remain on the bench, speculation has grown over whether it could be his final one on the high court.
🔮 The high court ruled 7-2 to halt a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit that would have forced the FCC to issue a final ruling on a revised rule allowing political parties and joint fundraising committees to access the same, more favorable television advertisement rates that are typically reserved for political candidates.
🔮 A lower federal court had ordered discovery into whether DOGE is subject to FOIA, but the Trump administration has argued the “sweeping, intrusive discovery” would effectively give the watchdog the documents it wants through the request before the court could even determine if it is subject to the public records request.
🔮 A female high school wrestler in Washington urged the Supreme Court earlier this week to intervene in a lawsuit over the state’s laws allowing biological men to compete in women’s sports, as the high court could issue another key ruling about transgender sports policies months after its landmark June decision.
Also by Jack Birle
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 34 articles by Jack Birle →

Topics

DOJ Democratic the 1st Circuit the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service the Minority Business and Development Agency

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 4× the 1st Circuit ORG · 3× DOJ ORG · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× Jerome PERSON · 2× the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service ORG · 2× Democrat NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× the Minority Business and Development Agency ORG · 1× the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness ORG · 1×

Narrative

Ester Murdukhayeva, deputy solicitor general at the New York attorney general’s office, argued that the Trump administration had essentially closed the agencies based on how much the size of the agencies had been reduced, urging the panel to uphold the lower court’s ruling. “The uncontested record in this case shows that defendants functionally shut down three congressionally created agencies by indiscriminately firing all or nearly all of their staff and ceasing to provide programs and services,” Murdukhayeva told the panel, adding that the 1st Circuit has ruled against the administration in similar cases regarding sweeping executive orders.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 The 1st Circuit panel did not indicate how or when it would rule.
2026-09-17 · Washington Examiner
First Circuit weighs Trump bid to gut trio of government agencies · assertive framing

Claims (16 extracted, 1 hedged)

A federal appeals court grilled the Trump administration on Wednesday over its bid to overturn a ruling that stopped it from gutting three small federal agencies the administration considered “unnecessary.” asserted
administration → grill → agencies
In March 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order reducing several agencies, including the Minority Business and Development Agency, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, and the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, to the minimum staffing and size mandated by law, as part of sweeping cuts his administration made to the size of the federal government. asserted
administration → sign → government
The order was challenged by a coalition of Democrat-led states, leading a federal district court judge to strike down the order as unlawful. asserted
order → challenge → order
A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit heard arguments from the Justice Department and the coalition of Democratic states as the administration seeks to reverse that ruling. asserted
administration → hear → ruling
DOJ lawyer Simon Jerome argued to the panel that the federal government should be allowed to reduce the agencies’ workforces and cut grants to the minimal amounts, rejecting the Democratic states’ claims that the executive order amounts to an unlawful closure of the agencies. “The agencies are free to streamline their operations within the bounds of federal statutory law. uncertain
agencies → argue → law
I haven’t taken plaintiffs to disagree at any point during this litigation, yet the order in this case prevents the three agencies in the appeal from doing that by complying with Executive Order 14238, a facially valid executive order,” Jerome said. asserted
Jerome → take → Order
The panel grilled Jerome on the DOJ’s arguments that the district court’s ruling, which reinstated grants and ordered employees who had been terminated via the executive order to be rehired, overstepped its authority under the law. asserted
who → grill → law
Ester Murdukhayeva, deputy solicitor general at the New York attorney general’s office, argued that the Trump administration had essentially closed the agencies based on how much the size of the agencies had been reduced, urging the panel to uphold the lower court’s ruling. “The uncontested record in this case shows that defendants functionally shut down three congressionally created agencies by indiscriminately firing all or nearly all of their staff and ceasing to provide programs and services,” Murdukhayeva told the panel, adding that the 1st Circuit has ruled against the administration in similar cases regarding sweeping executive orders. asserted
Circuit → argue → orders
“The district court correctly concluded that that was arbitrary and capricious, and defendants do not challenge that finding.” asserted
defendants → conclude → finding
The 1st Circuit panel did not indicate how or when it would rule. asserted
it → indicate → ?
The three-judge panel included U.S. Circuit Judges Julie Rikelman, an appointee of former President Joe Biden; William Kayatta, an appointee of former President Barack Obama; and Seth Aframe, a Biden appointee. asserted
panel → include → Obama
The Trump administration has faced several high-profile losses at the 1st Circuit, which is the most left-leaning federal appeals court in the country, but several of those losses have been successfully appealed to the Supreme Court. asserted
several → face → Court
Among the agencies that the administration aimed to reduce in size and workforce, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service has long been a source of scrutiny for alleged waste and abuse in the federal government. asserted
Service → aim → government
The FMCS is mainly designed to mediate conflicts between labor unions and companies. asserted
FMCS → design → unions
The largely unknown federal agency was found in the early 2010s to spend like “reigning kings,” spending government funds on painted portraits of each of the former agency heads, among other pricey expenditures. asserted
agency → find → expenditures
Trump’s March 2025 executive order did not single out the agency’s excesses but did say that the goal of his order was to eliminate “non-statutory functions” of “unnecessary governmental entities.” asserted
goal → single → entities
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support