President Donald Trump’s administration is planning to make it harder to get food aid through the federal government’s big grocery assistance program that serves about 1 in 10 Americans.
asserted
that → plan → Americans
The administration says the proposed rule would close a loophole by no longer allowing some people who receive benefits under the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program to automatically qualify for the separate Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program too.
asserted
who → say → Program
About 6.3 million people could lose eligibility for SNAP by the 2029 fiscal year if the proposed change takes effect, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program.
uncertain
which → lose → program
That is on top of 5.5 million people who already have lost SNAP benefits over the past year.
asserted
who → lose → year
The plan is laid out in a proposed rule published Tuesday on how to run SNAP, and the government is seeking public comment until next month.
asserted
government → lay → month
If it is accepted, the rule would not take full effect for about two years.
asserted
rule → accept → years
The proposal addresses the link between 2 federal programs
At issue are two separate federal programs.
asserted
programs → address → issue
The TANF program provides federal grants to states, which set their own eligibility rules for distributing cash and other benefits to low-income families with children.
asserted
which → provide → children
The incomes of recipients vary by program and state.
asserted
incomes → vary → program
Federal guidelines generally limit SNAP food benefits to those earning less than 130% of the poverty level, a little over $1,700 monthly for an individual or nearly $3,600 for a family of four.
asserted
guidelines → limit → four
To reduce duplicative paperwork, the federal government allows people who already receive TANF benefits to automatically qualify for SNAP — though they still have to apply.
asserted
they → reduce → SNAP
Some states have used that automatic eligibility to expand SNAP benefits to people who might not otherwise qualify.
uncertain
who → use → people
In 2009, President Barack Obama’s administration encouraged states to provide people a minimal TANF-funded benefit, such as an informational pamphlet or telephone hotline, as a way of qualifying them for the food program.
asserted
administration → encourage → program
Forty-one states and the District of Columbia have some form of broad-based categorical eligibility for SNAP, according to a USDA report from last year.
uncertain
states → have → year
The first Trump administration proposed to clamp down on such tactics in 2019.
asserted
administration → propose → 2019
But that proposal was withdrawn by President Joe Biden’s administration in 2021.
asserted
proposal → withdraw → 2021
The latest proposal is more sweeping and could prevent states from basing SNAP eligibility on TANF-funded benefits such as job-related counseling or one-time vouchers for vehicle repairs so that people can get to work, said David Super, a law professor at Georgetown University who has studied the food aid program.
uncertain
who → prevent → program
“The administration here is basically proposing to eliminate the flexibility that Congress gave the states to serve working poor people,” Super said.
asserted
Super → propose → people
SNAP is also connected to other programs for low-income people
Being in a household that receives SNAP benefits also makes school children eligible for free meals.
asserted
children → connect → meals
The Agriculture Department says that nearly 1.8 million children would lose eligibility with their family losing SNAP — but that 97% of them would still qualify for free or reduced price school meals through another process.
But the government says some of the children would not get the lunches, even if they are eligible, if their families don’t apply.
The proposal comes at a time when the number of people receiving the aid has fallen sharply — and on the heels of sweeping election gains for Democrats across the country.
asserted
number → say → country
“The public indicated they want their elected officials to focus on making life affordable,” the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning policy research institute, said in an analysis of the proposal.
asserted
Center → indicate → proposal
“Yet the Trump Administration is doubling down on making it harder for people to feed their families.”
asserted
people → double → families
It has been a period of flux for the food aid program
As of July, the Department of Agriculture, which runs SNAP, said 36 million people were receiving the aid.
asserted
people → run → aid
Over that time, another federal requirement expanded a work requirement to more enrollees, including those ages 55 to 64 and to parents whose youngest children are at least 14.
asserted
children → expand → parents
Trump’s big 2025 tax and policy law that broadened the work requirement also requires states to start shouldering about three-fourths of the cost of running it, up from half.
asserted
that → broaden → half
And they will also have to pay some of the costs of the benefits if their error rates exceed certain thresholds.
asserted
rates → have → thresholds
Congressional Democrats are pushing for a delay in implementation of that change.
asserted
Democrats → push → change
The newly proposed rule from the Trump administration “is just one of many things right now that states are grappling with that would reduce access to SNAP,” said Carolyn Vega, director of policy analysis for the advocacy group Share Our Strength.
asserted
Vega → propose → Strength
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities is concerned that the eligibility change may result in higher error rates for states — making them have to pay for more of the cost of benefits.
uncertain
them → concern → benefits
Patricia Anderson, an economics professor at Dartmouth College, said that out of the various administration efforts to reduce SNAP, “this one seems the most reasonable” because some people with higher incomes qualify through categorical eligibility.
asserted
people → say → eligibility
But she said there is a different conversation that can be had about whether the SNAP eligibility guidelines are too strict.
asserted
guidelines → say → ?
The Aporia
