Photo via The Guardian

Why does Pete Hegseth call himself secretary of war? ‘Dopey but dangerous’ wouldn’t fit on a badge | Emma Brockes

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Brockes, E. (2026, November 11). Why does Pete Hegseth call himself secretary of war? ‘Dopey but dangerous’ wouldn’t fit on a badge | Emma Brockes. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/11/pete-hegseth-secretary-of-war-dopey-dangerous-midterms-impeachment

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-11 · by Emma Brockes

Quick Summary

Columnist Emma Brockes examines why Pete Hegseth, who mockingly calls himself the "secretary of war," continues to hold his position despite being seen as underqualified and controversial. The article discusses recent impeachment attempts against Hegseth by Republican congressman Thomas Massie over alleged constitutional violations related to wars in Iran and Venezuela. Despite Republican support for Hegseth during these proceedings, there is speculation that he may face consequences following the Democrats' majority win in both chambers of Congress expected in January. Brockes characterizes Hegseth as a figure who blends absurdity with dangerousness, similar to President Trump's style, and contrasts him with more affable military figures like Gen Norman Schwarzkopf and Colin Powell.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Pete Hegseth, the US Secretary of Defense under President Trump, recently rebranded himself as "secretary of war," a move seen as inappropriate and cheeky. Despite this week's shelved attempt to impeach him, Democrats are likely to try again when they assume majority control in both chambers next January. Hegseth has faced numerous accusations, including violating the constitution by coordinating with Iran without congressional approval. The Guardian columnist Emma Brockes describes Hegseth as a man of "cartoonish inappropriateness," highlighting his underqualified status compared to other Trump cabinet members like Robert F Kennedy Jr and Kristi Noem.

Written for “Pete Hegseth Secretary Of War Title” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 145554 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-11

Story

Pete Hegseth Secretary Of War Title
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Just The News
Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 95/100
“Article A reports a live speech by Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon, while Article B is an opinion piece questioning his title and discussing potential impeachment efforts.”
Al Jazeera
Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on Hegseth's response to an impeachment attempt by Representative Massie, while Article B discusses broader implications and future possibilities regarding Hegseth's position and potential impeachment.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 13 of 70 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss Pete Hegseth's political situation and potential future but describe different aspects without referring to the same specific incident or time.”
BBC News
Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different time periods in Pete Hegseth's career and do not refer to the exact same news conference or incident.”
Toronto Sun
Hedges 3 of 21 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles describe different aspects of Pete Hegseth's tenure and related political events rather than a single specific incident.”
The Hindu
Leans left further right than this Hedges 5 of 26 claims Outlet record 78/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Pete Hegseth's situation, with Article A focusing on an expected impeachment vote for that week and Article B commenting more broadly on his rebranding as 'secretary of war'.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
21
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
3 of 21 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
65/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2314 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Emma Brockes
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Like the brief, wondrous cycle of the mayfly, we may come to look back on the career of Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defence who cheekily rebranded himself secretary of war, as the defining appointment of the Trump era: that is, one in which extraordinary power was handed to a man of cartoonish inappropriateness and which, despite this week’s shelved attempt to impeach him, may still turn out to have been luminously short-lived.
How will they react when they come into contact with that hulking great child who seems to be running things?
Also by Emma Brockes
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Democrats Iran Kentucky Republican Republicans

Subjects

Hegseth PERSON · 9× Trump PERSON · 4× Iran GPE · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Democrats NORP · 1× Kristi Noem PERSON · 1× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 1× Republican NORP · 1× Robert F Kennedy Jr PERSON · 1× Thomas Massie PERSON · 1×

Narrative

If Greg Bovino, the former US immigration chief who quit after two people were killed by agents under his command, looked like a textbook psycho in the manner of Sean Penn’s Col Steven J Lockjaw – the screw-loose character from the movie One Battle After Another – Hegseth is a different beast entirely; a Mr Incredible-like figure whose persona is so ridiculous, so dopey, as to distract from his dangerousness.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11
Like the brief, wondrous cycle of the mayfly, we may come to look back on the career of Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defence who cheekily rebranded himself secretary of war, as the defining appointment of the Trump era: that is, one in which extraordinary power was handed to a man of cartoonish inappropriateness and which, despite this week’s shelved attempt to impeach him, may still turn out to have been luminously short-lived.

Claims (21 extracted, 3 hedged)

Like the brief, wondrous cycle of the mayfly, we may come to look back on the career of Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defence who cheekily rebranded himself secretary of war, as the defining appointment of the Trump era: that is, one in which extraordinary power was handed to a man of cartoonish inappropriateness and which, despite this week’s shelved attempt to impeach him, may still turn out to have been luminously short-lived. uncertain
which → come → him
In January, the Democrats will assume a majority in both chambers and are likely to have another crack at impeaching Hegseth. asserted
Democrats → assume → Hegseth
In the meantime, we can only look on and wonder at his meaning. asserted
we → look → meaning
It is quite something, in the context of Trump cabinet appointments that have included Robert F Kennedy Jr and Kristi Noem, to be the most glaringly underqualified person in the West Wing, but since being sworn in almost two years ago, Hegseth has comfortably seen off any rivals to his crown. asserted
Hegseth → include → crown
This week, eight articles of impeachment, or “high crimes and misdemeanours” as the official rubric has it, were levied against him by Thomas Massie, an outgoing Republican congressman from Kentucky, who accused Hegseth of illegal acts including violating the constitution by conducting an unauthorised war with Iran and effecting regime change in Venezuela. asserted
who → have → Venezuela
Republicans narrowly saw off the proceedings and, somewhat to the surprise of observers, joined the president in rallying energetically to Hegseth’s defence. asserted
Republicans → see → defence
This, too, may not last; in the wake of the Republicans’ shellacking in the midterms, speculation as to who would take the fall for Trump’s losses focused on Hegseth, after JD Vance pointed to the Iran war as a root cause of the losses. uncertain
Vance → last → losses
But perhaps this underestimates Hegseth’s appeal to the president. asserted
this → underestimate → president
If Greg Bovino, the former US immigration chief who quit after two people were killed by agents under his command, looked like a textbook psycho in the manner of Sean Penn’s Col Steven J Lockjaw – the screw-loose character from the movie One Battle After Another – Hegseth is a different beast entirely; a Mr Incredible-like figure whose persona is so ridiculous, so dopey, as to distract from his dangerousness. asserted
persona → quit → dangerousness
Such a manoeuvre is, of course, in line both with Trump’s own highly developed ability to marry deadly threat levels with the affect of a buffoon, and a more general tradition in the US of men of war who operate with the affability of the Pillsbury Doughboy. asserted
who → marry → Doughboy
Cast your minds back to Gen “Stormin’” Norman Schwarzkopf, a man shaped like a freestanding wardrobe, who led coalition forces in the first Gulf war, or Colin Powell, his senior at the time who, as chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and despite leading the most powerful military in the world, appeared at briefings with the casual ease and likability of a lounge singer. asserted
who → cast → singer
Compare this with the way we do things in this country, where, generally speaking, we like our military men to be slight of form, quiet of voice, thin of moustache and ruthless of execution. asserted
men → compare → execution
As a platonic ideal, if military officers in the US take the shape of comfy old Tom Hanks in Saving Private Ryan, in Britain we’re more partial to Trevor Howard in The Third Man, all twinkly eyes and icy veins, or the unyielding Alec Guinness in The Bridge on the River Kwai, a man who, beneath his quivering, rule-following exterior, is as pitiless as rain and as mad as a snake. asserted
who → take → snake
Both represent sleights of hand, to some degree. asserted
Both → represent → degree
Hegseth, of course, never led the US army. asserted
Hegseth → lead → army
While serving in the military, he rose to the middling rank of major (it was his service on Fox & Friends that, in all likelihood, made him a four-star general in Trump’s eyes). asserted
him → serve → eyes
And US defence secretaries aren’t themselves expected to be especially martial; let’s enjoy a quick drive-by on the memory of Dick Cheney, secretary of defence under George H W Bush, accidentally shooting his own hunting buddy in the face during a quail hunting trip in southern Texas. asserted
Cheney → expect → Texas
But Hegseth looks the part, not just of the genial American warrior, but of the very specific ideal favoured by Trump in which the quiff-wearing, square jaw-rocking secretary of defence embodies the 1950s aesthetic for which the president pines. asserted
president → look → which
If Democrats manage to impeach and oust him next year, he may linger in our minds, against stiff competition, as the most hollow, disastrous and surreal piece of casting in Trump’s cabinet of misfits and rogues. uncertain
he → manage → misfits
- Emma Brockes is a Guardian columnist - Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? asserted
you → have → article
If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here. asserted
you → like → section
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support