‘We’ll forget her soon enough’: Diana’s brother makes explosive claim about Charles

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-09-16 · by David Crowe
Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗

Summary

Earl Spencer claims that King Charles, then Prince of Wales, told him over the phone that people would “forget” Princess Diana soon after her death in 1997. This claim is made in a new book by Earl Spencer and has prompted Buckingham Palace to issue a rare rebuttal. The palace statement suggests that grief can affect memory but does not directly address the specific accusation.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
30%
7 of 23 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
96.6
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
9
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Charles Spencer, Diana's brother and the ninth Earl Spencer, has alleged in his upcoming memoir "Swan Song: Diana, My Sister" that just days after Princess Diana’s death on September 8, 1997, he received a phone call from then-Prince Charles who told him, “rest assured, we’ll forget her soon enough.” This claim is made amid disputes over funeral arrangements for the princess, including whether Princes William and Harry, aged 15 and 12 at the time, should walk in their mother's funeral procession. Earl Spencer insisted Diana would not have wanted her young sons to endure such a public ordeal. In response, Buckingham Palace issued a statement saying Charles is "mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory," without directly addressing the specific claim but indicating it could be influenced by the passage of time.

Written for “Charles Diana Claims” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 8 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 2 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 14465: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-17

Story

📰 Charles Diana Claims
Politics · 9 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 30% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard · 0.91 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 29% hedged 4 of 14 📰 publisher trust 71
“Both articles describe Buckingham Palace's response to claims made by Earl Spencer about Prince Charles's alleged comment regarding Princess Diana after her death.”
Evening Standard · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 71
“Both articles report on Buckingham Palace's response to Earl Spencer's claims about King Charles made in his new book regarding Princess Diana.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 1 of 7 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe King Charles's response to Earl Spencer's claims about Diana in a new book, on the same day.”
Evening Standard · 0.92 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 23% hedged 3 of 13 📰 publisher trust 71
“Both articles describe Buckingham Palace's response to Earl Spencer's claims about a conversation between him and King Charles regarding Princess Diana shortly after her death.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 100% hedged 2 of 2 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe King Charles responding to an explosive claim by Earl Spencer about their private conversation after Princess Diana's death, indicating the same specific incident.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 4 of 23 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles report on King Charles' response to Earl Spencer's claims about Diana in a new book published on the same date.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 27 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A reports on the theft of copies of Earl Spencer's book from a lorry, while Article B discusses King Charles' response to an explosive claim made by Earl Spencer in his book about Diana.”
Daily Mail · 0.93 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 24 📰 publisher trust 59
“While both articles discuss a claim made by Earl Spencer about Prince Charles's remarks after Princess Diana's death, Article A reports on the content of the memoir while Article B focuses on Buckingham Palace's response to the claim.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 26 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A discusses Prince Harry's awareness of the contents of Charles Spencer's book, while Article B focuses on Buckingham Palace's rebuttal to an explosive claim made in the same book.”

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 313 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

David Crowe
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 King Charles has hit back at an explosive claim that he said people would forget his first wife, Diana, “soon enough” after her death in a high-speed car crash in 1997.
🔮 Voters responded with a thumping endorsement for Siegmund and the party he leads, the Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany), known as the AfD. Interim results showed the AfD won 44 per cent of the vote, although it is not yet clear whether this will be enough to install Siegmund in power.
Also by David Crowe
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Britain Buckingham Palace Paris

Subjects

Diana PERSON · 10× Charles PERSON · 6× Earl Spencer PERSON · 5× Harry PERSON · 3× Buckingham Palace ORG · 2× Earl Spencer’s PERSON · 2× Britain GPE · 1× Mummy PERSON · 1× Philip PERSON · 1× William PERSON · 1×

Narrative

“While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss,” the palace said in a statement.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 King Charles has hit back at an explosive claim that he said people would forget his first wife, Diana, “soon enough” after her death in a high-speed car crash in 1997.

Claims (23 extracted, 7 hedged)

King Charles has hit back at an explosive claim that he said people would forget his first wife, Diana, “soon enough” after her death in a high-speed car crash in 1997. uncertain
people → hit → 1997
Buckingham Palace took the rare step of rebutting the new claim after Princess Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, revealed his account of private conversations in a new book about his sister. uncertain
brother → take → sister
The claim centres on the earl’s strong belief that the Princess of Wales would not have wanted her two sons, Princes William and Harry, to walk behind her coffin in her funeral procession. uncertain
sons → centre → procession
Earl Spencer asserts in his new book that he received a phone call from the king, then the Prince of Wales, to confirm the plan for the young men, then aged 15 and 12, to be part of the procession. asserted
men → assert → procession
Diana’s brother says he complained about the plan, but Charles insisted it would go ahead. asserted
it → say → plan
“He unleashed down the phone what I have always taken to be his pent-up contempt for Diana, and his horror that the world was so bowled over by her death,” the earl writes in the new book. “‘Rest assured,’ he hissed, ‘we’ll forget her soon enough’.” asserted
we → unleash → her
Earl Spencer joined Charles and Prince Philip in the funeral procession at a time of national mourning for Diana, and he delivered the eulogy for his sister in Westminster Cathedral in September 1997. asserted
he → join → September
Extracts from his new book, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, appeared in The Daily Mirror amid widespread expectations he could be heavily critical of Charles and the royal family. uncertain
he → appear → Charles
Earl Spencer delivered a eulogy at his Diana’s funeral in Westminster Abbey that was later named one of the greatest speeches of the 20th century. asserted
that → deliver → century
He has described the new book as a continuation of that eulogy. asserted
He → describe → eulogy
Prior to the book’s release, he said: “The aim of this book is to tell the truth about Diana from her brother’s perspective ... asserted
aim → say → perspective
I want to speak on Diana’s behalf and do so in an openly positive way.” asserted
I → want → way
Earl Spencer’s new claim appears likely to heighten the rifts within the family when Prince Harry has a strained relationship with his father after his memoir, Spare, which also touched on the decision over the funeral. uncertain
which → appear → funeral
“It seemed a lot to ask of two young boys,” Harry wrote. asserted
Harry → seem → boys
Mummy’s brother, Uncle Charles [Earl Spencer], raised hell. asserted
Charles → raise → hell
‘You can’t make these boys walk behind their mother’s coffin! asserted
boys → make → coffin
It’s barbaric’.” asserted
It → ’ → ?
While Earl Spencer’s concerns have been long known, his claim that Charles said Diana would be forgotten “soon enough” has made headlines in Britain. uncertain
Diana → know → Britain
The attention prompted Buckingham Palace to counter the claim without going into the details of the contested phone conversation from almost three decades ago. uncertain
attention → prompt → conversation
“While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss,” the palace said in a statement. asserted
palace → comment → statement
Princess Diana was killed in a crash in Paris at the age of 36 when paparazzi photographers were chasing the car she was in with her partner at the time, Dodi Fayed. asserted
she → kill → time
An inquest into her death ruled that it was caused by the gross negligence of the driver, Henri Paul, who was drunk, and the pursuit by the paparazzi. asserted
who → rule → paparazzi
Get a note directly from our foreign correspondents on what’s making headlines around the world. asserted
what → get → world
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support