Photo via Evening Standard

Palace hits back at claims King said Diana would be forgotten ‘soon enough’

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

William, H. (2026, September 16). Palace hits back at claims King said Diana would be forgotten ‘soon enough’. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/earl-spencer-diana-prince-charles-buckingham-palace-daily-mail-b1297261.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-09-16 · by Helen William

Quick Summary

Earl Spencer claims in his memoir serialised by the Daily Mail that Prince Charles said "we’ll forget her soon enough" about Princess Diana shortly after her death in 1997. Buckingham Palace denied these allegations, stating that the pain of grief can distort memory and judgment. The dispute centers around funeral arrangements where William and Harry were to walk behind their mother’s coffin, which Earl Spencer opposed as he believed it was not what Diana would have wanted.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In September 2026, Prince Harry and his wife Meghan moved their children, Prince Archie (aged seven) and Princess Lilibet (five), to a new school in Britain after just two days due to security concerns. The couple's spokesperson cited heavy traffic between their home and the original school as the reason for the move. This decision came shortly after Harry and Meghan returned to Britain from California, where they had lived for six years. Additionally, the family's publicly-funded security is currently being reviewed by a government committee known as Ravec (the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures).

Written for “Charles Spencer's Memoir Controversy” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 141 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Charles Spencer's Memoir Controversy
Entertainment · 142 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 23% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
Hedges 4 of 14 claims Outlet record 65/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 65/100
The Guardian
Hedges 9 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
South China Morning Post
Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 64/100
Global News
Hedges 4 of 19 claims Outlet record 63/100
CBC News
Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 74/100
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 4 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
23%
3 of 13 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
65/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
142
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 8032 article(s) · 68 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 68 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Helen William
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Ensuring that the Online Safety Act accurately reflects the types and severity of content that children see online is crucial, but unless the level of exposure is reduced, children will continue to experience significant harm to their physical and emotional health, wellbeing, relationships and development.”
🔮 “Despite their best efforts, it became clear nothing more could be done to save him and he was confirmed deceased at the scene.
🔮 He is also accused of sexually assaulting an 18-year-old woman in Wandsworth, south London, in May 2004.
🔮 She said: “We are dreadful but when you have had great love you have great grief and that is what we knew would happen.
🔮 Christiane Amanpour announces she is leaving CNN after 43 years London-born Amanpour, 68, who has become a household name worldwide as a foreign correspondent, will be signing off in June.
🔮 The move has been taken amid “concerns that Noah’s medical records may have been viewed inappropriately”, he added.
🔮 In the run-up to their return, Charles was said to be glad to be able to spend more time with the family but remained adamant they would not be working royals, and there was no half-in, half-out option. Within two weeks of arriving, there was reported pushback from Harry and Meghan after a letter, authorised by the King, was circulated by the Lord Chamberlain to senior stakeholders in the Government and military reiterating the couple were “private citizens” and setting out guidance on how they should be treated.
2026-09-26 · assertive framing · Archie and Lilibet ‘happy in school’, Harry says
🔮 A smiling Cruise commented “great jacket” as William walked towards him wearing a tuxedo with a striking, double-breasted, velvet jacket and bow tie on the red carpet – which was black for the night.
🔮 A smiling Cruise commented “great jacket” as William walked towards him wearing a tuxedo with a striking, double-breasted, velvet jacket and bow tie on the red carpet – which was black for the night.
🔮 A smiling Cruise commented “great jacket” as William walked towards him wearing a tuxedo with a striking double-breasted velvet jacket and bow tie on the red carpet – which was black for the night.
Also by Helen William
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Helen William →

Topics

London Paris the Daily Mail

Subjects

Charles PERSON · 6× Diana PERSON · 6× Harry PERSON · 3× William PERSON · 3× Earl Spencer PERSON · 2× Mountbatten PERSON · 2× Prince Harry PERSON · 1× Prince William PERSON · 1× Spencer PERSON · 1× the Daily Mail ORG · 1×

Narrative

William, Harry, Charles, Prince Philip and the Earl walked behind Diana’s coffin in a funeral procession through central London to the funeral service at Westminster Abbey. Read More The Earl then delivered a passionate eulogy at Diana’s funeral, pledging the princess’ “blood family” would protect William and Harry “so that their souls are not simply immersed by duty and tradition, but can sing openly as you planned”.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 It is alleged that just days after Diana’s death in 1997, Charles, who was then the Prince of Wales, told her brother “rest assured, we’ll forget her soon enough” during a discussion about arrangements for the funeral in which Prince William and Prince Harry, then aged 15 and 12, walked behind their mother’s coffin.

Claims (13 extracted, 3 hedged)

It is alleged that just days after Diana’s death in 1997, Charles, who was then the Prince of Wales, told her brother “rest assured, we’ll forget her soon enough” during a discussion about arrangements for the funeral in which Prince William and Prince Harry, then aged 15 and 12, walked behind their mother’s coffin. asserted
William → allege → coffin
In response to the claims, made in a memoir of Diana’s brother Earl Spencer which is being serialised in the Daily Mail, a Buckingham Palace spokesman said Charles is “mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason”. uncertain
pain → make → reason
The statement reads: “While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss.” asserted
others → read → loss
Charles is said to have made the comments about his ex-wife in a row over funeral preparations and to have questioned the Spencer family’s sense of duty. asserted
Charles → say → duty
The Earl says he insisted to the then Prince of Wales that Diana would not have wanted her young sons to have made the difficult public walk, it is claimed. asserted
it → say → walk
According to the newspaper, Earl Spencer says the book – Swan Song: Diana, My Sister – has been written to correct “untruths” told about his older sister, who died in a Paris car crash in August 1997. uncertain
who → accord → August
According to a book excerpt, one of Queen Elizabeth II’s senior aides told him that William and Harry were to walk in the procession, prompting the Earl to state “that’s not going to happen”. uncertain
that → accord → Earl
Charles called minutes later and told him that 18 years earlier he had walked in the funeral procession of his great-uncle, Lord Mountbatten, it is claimed. asserted
it → call → uncle
The Earl pointed out that Charles had been 30 at the time of Lord Mountbatten’s funeral in 1979. asserted
Charles → point → 1979
“I assumed the pause signalled an effort to bring himself under control, but then he unleashed down the phone what I have always taken to be his pent-up contempt for Diana, and his horror that the world was so bowled over by her death. asserted
world → assume → death
‘Rest assured’, he hissed, ‘we’ll forget her soon enough!’” asserted
we → rest → her
The Earl says he then hung up the phone. asserted
he → say → phone
William, Harry, Charles, Prince Philip and the Earl walked behind Diana’s coffin in a funeral procession through central London to the funeral service at Westminster Abbey. Read More The Earl then delivered a passionate eulogy at Diana’s funeral, pledging the princess’ “blood family” would protect William and Harry “so that their souls are not simply immersed by duty and tradition, but can sing openly as you planned”. asserted
you → walk → duty
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support