Americans say they're terrified of AI 'destroying humanity' as Trump doubles down on NO safeguards demand

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-16 · by Samantha Loren
Read the original at Daily Mail ↗

Summary

A Politico poll reveals that two-thirds of Americans view advanced artificial intelligence as a significant risk to humanity, with concerns cutting across party lines. Notably, Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon recently joined forces to warn about the dangers of unregulated AI during an event in Washington, highlighting a rare bipartisan agreement on this issue. Lawmakers are responding by considering various proposals for regulating AI, including the possibility of a select congressional committee if Democrats regain control of the House.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
17
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
35%
6 of 17 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
58.6
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

A new Politico poll conducted by Public First from September 13-15 found that around two-thirds of Americans believe advanced AI poses at least a moderate risk to humanity's future. The concern is bipartisan, with 70% of Kamala Harris supporters and 60% of Trump voters seeing such risks. Lawmakers are grappling with how to regulate AI as public fear grows over the technology’s potential dangers. Notably, Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon recently warned about unchecked AI during a joint appearance in Washington. Meanwhile, Melania Trump emphasized the importance of U.S. leadership in AI while visiting an elementary school in North Carolina. Democrats are exploring the creation of a select congressional committee on AI if they regain control of the House in upcoming midterm elections.

Written for “AI Safety Concerns” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 14442 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-17

Story

📰 AI Safety Concerns
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 35% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 4% hedged 2 of 49 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss related themes around AI concerns and regulation but describe different specific moments in time and distinct viewpoints.”
AI Is a Test of Our Maturity. *Gulp* different event · 85%
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 8 of 99
“The articles discuss AI concerns and political reactions but describe different events; one mentions an upcoming 'Pro-Human Assembly' while the other reports on broader legislative discussions.”
The Free Press
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 20% hedged 3 of 15 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses various perspectives on AI warnings and their implications, while Article B focuses on American public opinion and lawmakers' efforts to regulate AI, indicating different aspects of a broader topic.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 18% hedged 2 of 11 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects and timelines related to AI regulation efforts on Capitol Hill, rather than describing a single specific event.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 12% hedged 7 of 58 📰 publisher trust 93
“The articles discuss general concerns and debates over AI safety but do not describe a single specific incident happening at the same time and place.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 53 📰 publisher trust 96
“While both articles discuss President Trump's stance on AI regulation and public concerns, they refer to different times or aspects of an ongoing debate rather than a single specific incident.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 24% hedged 8 of 34 📰 publisher trust 60
“While both articles discuss Trump's stance on AI regulation and public concerns, they describe different points in time or aspects of the ongoing debate.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 29 📰 publisher trust 96
“While both articles discuss Trump's stance on AI and warnings about its risks, they describe different aspects or timeframes of the overall situation.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 33% hedged 1 of 3 📰 publisher trust 77
“The articles discuss similar topics but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 19% hedged 10 of 54 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss related topics but describe different points in time and distinct aspects of the ongoing debate on AI, with Article A focusing on Trump's initial stance and Article B on subsequent reactions and lawmakers' efforts.”

Publisher

Daily Mail · 760 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)
2026-09-15
Infamous prisoner known for his 'stop snitching' slogan DISAPPEARS during transfer from one federal prison to another
2026-09-15
Charles Manson's 'right-hand man' dies in prison at 83 after his parole was blocked 8 times
2026-09-15
Jeffrey Epstein's suicide watch 'companion' insists paedophile financier DID kill himself after becoming 'defeated' in his final days
2026-09-07
The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary
2026-09-06
Clarifications and corrections

Who wrote this

Samantha Loren
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - Sign up HERE to our DC Insider newsletter - your guide to what's rocking Washington, rattling the White House and setting tongues wagging on the Hill - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Lawmakers are scrambling to figure out how to regulate and put limits on artificial intelligence as Americans are increasingly concerned about how powerful the technology could become. Artificial intelligence has become one of Washington's most unexpected areas of bipartisan agreement, with lawmakers from both parties warning about the technology's potential risks to humanity. A new Politico poll, conducted by Public First from September 13 - 15, found that around two-thirds of Americans believe advanced AI poses at least a moderate risk of eventually destroying humanity.
🔮 - Sign up HERE to our DC Insider newsletter - your guide to what's rocking Washington, rattling the White House and setting tongues wagging on the Hill - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Trump supporters at the GOP midterm convention in Dallas brushed off Democratic efforts to impeach War Secretary Pete Hegseth, but they may be in for a rude awakening. Democrats do not currently have the votes to impeach Hegseth, with Republicans holding the House majority.
🔮 Newsom told CNN's Jake Tapper on Monday that he would not run for president if former Vice President Kamala Harris decides to seek the Democratic nomination.
Also by Samantha Loren
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Americans Politico Public First Washington the White House

Subjects

Washington GPE · 5× Americans NORP · 4× Trump PERSON · 4× Bernie Sanders PERSON · 2× House ORG · 2× Melania Trump PERSON · 2× Politico ORG · 2× Public First ORG · 2× Steve Bannon PERSON · 2× the White House ORG · 2×

Narrative

A new Politico poll, conducted by Public First from September 13 - 15, found that around two-thirds of Americans believe advanced AI poses at least a moderate risk of eventually destroying humanity In an unusual political pairing, Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon shared a stage in Washington on Tuesday to warn about the dangers of unchecked AI Melania Trump said that it's 'very important' that the US 'lead' in AI as a country, while visiting an elementary school in North Carolina Democrats are discussing the creation of a select congressional committee devoted to AI if they regain control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 - Sign up HERE to our DC Insider newsletter - your guide to what's rocking Washington, rattling the White House and setting tongues wagging on the Hill - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Lawmakers are scrambling to figure out how to regulate and put limits on artificial intelligence as Americans are increasingly concerned about how powerful the technology could become. Artificial intelligence has become one of Washington's most unexpected areas of bipartisan agreement, with lawmakers from both parties warning about the technology's potential risks to humanity. A new Politico poll, conducted by Public First from September 13 - 15, found that around two-thirds of Americans believe advanced AI poses at least a moderate risk of eventually destroying humanity.

Claims (17 extracted, 6 hedged)

- Sign up HERE to our DC Insider newsletter - your guide to what's rocking Washington, rattling the White House and setting tongues wagging on the Hill - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Lawmakers are scrambling to figure out how to regulate and put limits on artificial intelligence as Americans are increasingly concerned about how powerful the technology could become. Artificial intelligence has become one of Washington's most unexpected areas of bipartisan agreement, with lawmakers from both parties warning about the technology's potential risks to humanity. A new Politico poll, conducted by Public First from September 13 - 15, found that around two-thirds of Americans believe advanced AI poses at least a moderate risk of eventually destroying humanity. uncertain
AI → sign → humanity
The concern crosses party lines, with 70 percent of 2024 Kamala Harris voters and 60 percent of Trump voters seeing such a risk. asserted
percent → cross → risk
Americans are also leaning toward slowing or pausing the development of more advanced AI rather than simply pushing ahead, according to the survey. uncertain
Americans → lean → survey
About half believe technology leaders warning that AI could become catastrophic genuinely believe their warnings, while only 26 percent think they are using the threat as a marketing stunt. uncertain
they → believe → stunt
The findings come as some of Silicon Valley's biggest names, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk have raised increasingly serious concerns about the pace of AI development. And now Washington is taking notice. asserted
Washington → come → notice
A new Politico poll, conducted by Public First from September 13 - 15, found that around two-thirds of Americans believe advanced AI poses at least a moderate risk of eventually destroying humanity In an unusual political pairing, Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon shared a stage in Washington on Tuesday to warn about the dangers of unchecked AI Melania Trump said that it's 'very important' that the US 'lead' in AI as a country, while visiting an elementary school in North Carolina Democrats are discussing the creation of a select congressional committee devoted to AI if they regain control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections. asserted
they → conduct → elections
Representative Ted Lieu has reportedly discussed the proposal with Democratic leadership, while lawmakers from both parties are already working together on specific proposals. uncertain
lawmakers → discuss → proposals
In an unusual political pairing, Bernie Sanders and Trump ally Steve Bannon shared a stage in Washington on Tuesday to warn about the dangers of unchecked AI. asserted
Sanders → share → AI
The progressive Vermont senator and longtime Trump ally both called for greater human control over the technology, despite their major political differences. asserted
senator → call → differences
Their appearance underscored how AI is creating new areas of agreement that cross traditional political lines. asserted
that → underscore → lines
Senator Josh Hawley and Senator Richard Blumenthal have backed legislation aimed at assessing and monitoring AI systems. asserted
Hawley → back → systems
Other bipartisan proposals have focused on greater transparency and giving humans more control over powerful AI systems. asserted
proposals → focus → systems
But the White House is pushing in another direction. asserted
House → push → direction
Trump has repeatedly rejected calls for a slowdown, describing fears that AI could 'destroy humanity' as a 'HOAX.' uncertain
AI → reject → HOAX
He has argued that America cannot afford to fall behind China and has portrayed AI as a crucial economic and strategic race. House Speaker Mike Johnson has also rejected an AI moratorium, warning that America could surrender its technological advantage to China. At the same time, Johnson has said there should be 'guardrails,' including independent auditing and greater transparency from AI companies. uncertain
Johnson → argue → companies
First Lady Melania Trump has offered a somewhat different message. asserted
Trump → offer → message
On Tuesday, she visited an elementary school celebrating the implementation of AI in schools, highlighting efforts to introduce students to the technology while emphasizing the need for them to remain vigilant. asserted
them → visit → need
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support