When the ICAC’s a-rocking, the jokes come a-knocking

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-09-16 · by Kate McClymont
Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗

Summary

Jeremy Greenwood testified for his sixth day in an ongoing corruption inquiry, where he was accused of fabricating evidence regarding payments to Anita Perrottet. The inquiry centers on the $660,699 paid by lobbying firm Beckington to Perrottet’s consulting company, with counsel Dr Peggy Dwyer suggesting this payment was a sham to hide kickbacks related to dodgy developer Jean Nassif. Greenwood struggled to validate Perrottet's work, particularly regarding advice she claimed to have given on vaping issues for clients like Philip Morris, despite her own inability to recall specifics of the work done or advice provided.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
17%
6 of 35 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
96.6
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in New South Wales is investigating alleged corruption involving Jeremy Greenwood and Anita Perrottet. During his testimony on June, Greenwood accused Perrottet of providing "bogus" work for which she was paid an extraordinary amount of $660,699 by Greenwood's lobbying company, Beckington. Counsel assisting the inquiry, Dr Peggy Dwyer, suggested that Greenwood was manufacturing evidence and lying to stitch up a narrative. The inquiry centers on what services Perrottet provided to justify her payment; thus far, evidence suggests she did nothing substantial. Instead, the commission believes the payments were part of a scheme involving Jean Nassif, who paid Beckington $2 million in suspicious circumstances related to Charles Perrottet, Anita's husband and a powerbroker within the NSW Liberal Party.

Written for “ICAC Investigations Jokes” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.45 Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning score -0.45 for article 14371 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-17

Story

📰 ICAC Investigations Jokes
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 30 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe different parts of the ICAC inquiry, with Article A focusing on Jean Nassif's testimony and Article B discussing Jeremy Greenwood's sixth day in the witness box.”

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 313 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Kate McClymont
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Perrottet replied, “They may have been a vaping client.
2026-09-16 · assertive framing · When the ICAC’s a-rocking, the jokes come a-knocking
🔮 At the heart of these Machiavellian manipulations appears to be the desire to attire oneself in the crimson mayoral robes, wear the heavy, silver-linked chain and have use of the mayoral wheels: a Toyota.
More on this subject from Kate McClymont
Rats in the ranks: ICAC hears double-crosses, blackmail and broken promises
2026-09-15 · The Sydney Morning Herald · 52% similar

Topics

Beckington Greenwood Macquarie Consulting NSW Liberal Party Philip Morris

Subjects

Greenwood PERSON · 8× Dwyer PERSON · 5× Perrottet PERSON · 5× Anita PERSON · 4× Anita Perrottet PERSON · 4× Beckington ORG · 3× Jean Nassif PERSON · 2× Jeremy ORG · 2× Nassif PERSON · 2× Philip Morris ORG · 2×

Narrative

Due to his wild rantings, punctuated by angry finger-pointing when giving evidence via a video link from his Beiruit bedroom, it was hard to discern what he thought about anything except his narcissistic obsession with perceived Deep State conspiracies to destroy him and his development company.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 Perrottet replied, “They may have been a vaping client.
2026-09-17 · The Sydney Morning Herald
When the ICAC’s a-rocking, the jokes come a-knocking · assertive framing

Claims (35 extracted, 6 hedged)

Given that memory loss has been a key feature of this corruption inquiry, Jeremy Greenwood’s return for his sixth day in the witness box has provided some helpful reminders, especially about crowd favourite Anita Perrottet. asserted
return → give → Perrottet
Greenwood was accused of “manufacturing evidence” about the “bogus” work Anita Perrottet did for him. asserted
Perrottet → accuse → him
“You’re trying to stitch up your evidence and the lies are not, in fact, making up any sort of reasonable narrative,” suggested counsel assisting the inquiry, Dr Peggy Dwyer, SC. uncertain
counsel → try → inquiry
At the heart of this inquiry is precisely what advice the sister-in-law of former premier Dominic Perrottet provided to be paid the extraordinary sum of $660,699 by Greenwood and Christian Ellis’s lobbying company, Beckington. asserted
provided → provide → company
According to the evidence so far, the answer appears to be absolutely nothing. uncertain
answer → accord → evidence
The commission’s version is that Anita’s company, Macquarie Consulting, provided “sham invoices” to disguise her husband Charles’ one-third share of the $2 million dodgy developer Jean Nassif paid to Beckington. asserted
Nassif → provide → Beckington
At the time the money was paid, Charles Perrottet, a NSW Liberal Party powerbroker, was employed full-time in Melbourne as BP Australia’s head of strategy. asserted
Perrottet → pay → strategy
Nassif’s money was alleged to have been used by hard-right Liberal operatives to fund branch stacking and attempts to destroy Nassif’s enemies: police commissioner David Elliott and building commissioner David Chandler. asserted
money → allege → enemies
“Your evidence is ridiculous,” Dwyer offered several times as Greenwood attempted to validate Anita Perrottet’s insightful advice to him, which he said he passed on to the clients of his lobbying firm. asserted
he → offer → firm
For example, when interrogated as to what advice Anita had provided to him on vaping, Greenwood suggested she offered a “mum’s perspective”. uncertain
she → interrogate → perspective
Dwyer pressed Greenwood as to how old Perrottet’s children were when she was giving a “mum’s perspective”. asserted
she → press → perspective
Greenwood retorted that the age of her children wasn’t relevant, which, in turn, earned him a rebuke from assistant commissioner Fabian Gleeson. asserted
which → retort → Gleeson
Greenwood was informed that Perrottet’s children were aged two and three when she was giving her advice. asserted
she → inform → advice
“Did she give you a mum’s perspective on deterring under-fives from vaping?” Dwyer asked sardonically. asserted
Dwyer → give → fives
Last month, when she was giving evidence, Anita Perrottet was asked if she had given any advice to Greenwood for his client, tobacco giant Philip Morris. asserted
she → give → client
I’m not sure, I can’t remember,” she replied. asserted
she → ’m → ?
“So is your answer you can’t remember doing any work for Jeremy related to Philip Morris?” Dwyer asked. asserted
Dwyer → remember → Morris
Perrottet replied, “They may have been a vaping client. uncertain
They → reply → ?
I’m, I just can’t remember, I’m sorry. asserted
I → ’m → ?
My evidence is I can’t remember.” asserted
I → remember → ?
Perrottet went on to say she had “memories of catching up with Jeremy and having conversations, going through things, but I don’t remember all the particulars”. asserted
I → go → particulars
She also said that she wasn’t sure what research she may have done on vaping, but she may have “looked and read” articles on vaping “through my socials,” which she said were Instagram and Facebook. “ uncertain
she → say → socials
Oh, Mrs Perrottet, this is rubbish that you are making up because you don’t want the commission to have a way of checking whether or not you researched it on your computer,” Dwyer put to her. asserted
Dwyer → make → her
“That is not true,” she replied. asserted
she → reply → ?
Such is the popularity of ICAC crowd favourite Anita Perrottet that the queen of the “I don’t recall”s has become the subject of her very own knock-knock joke, which was offered by a member of the public. asserted
which → become → public
I neeta moment to think about it. asserted
I → neeta → it
Jean Nassif was one witness who could have done with taking a moment to think. uncertain
who → do → moment
Due to his wild rantings, punctuated by angry finger-pointing when giving evidence via a video link from his Beiruit bedroom, it was hard to discern what he thought about anything except his narcissistic obsession with perceived Deep State conspiracies to destroy him and his development company. asserted
he → punctuate → him
“I paid funds for Beckington to help me with the nonsense being thrown on me and for their hard work. asserted
I → pay → work
What they did in that fund after is not my business,” he fumed. asserted
he → fume → fund
The hearing continues. asserted
hearing → continue → ?
Sydney’s best coverage of the ICAC inquiry - ‘You like?’ asserted
You → like → inquiry
- The lobbyist, the sealed envelope and the mystery ‘wire me up’ text - ‘Mum’s perspective’: Liberal apparatchik said he paid Anita Perrottet for invaluable advice - asserted
he → wire → advice
‘Ridiculous way to run a business’: Liberal operative says no documents kept for $5m deal - asserted
documents → run → deal
‘There’s the door’: Retiring Liberal MP blasts party hacks as moderates wane asserted
moderates → ’ → hacks
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support