Photo via New York Post

Lindsay Clancy lawyer’s two big legal gambits slapped down by judge — who refuses to dismiss case

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

DeGregory, P. (2026, November 9). Lindsay Clancy lawyer’s two big legal gambits slapped down by judge — who refuses to dismiss case. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/09/us-news/lindsay-clancy-lawyers-two-big-legal-gambits-slapped-down-by-judge-who-refuses-to-dismiss-case/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-09 · by Priscilla DeGregory

Quick Summary

Judge William Sullivan rejected Lindsay Clancy’s legal arguments to dismiss her murder case involving the deaths of her three children, likely setting up a second trial for early spring. The judge ruled against questioning the holdout juror who caused the first mistrial and denied access to information about this juror’s background, finding these requests would interfere with jury deliberations and possibly coerce the juror.
Written by AI on 2026-11-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On November 9, 2026, Judge William Sullivan denied Lindsay Clancy’s request to dismiss murder charges and ruled that a retrial is permissible. Clancy was initially charged with three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of her three children in January 2023 in Duxbury, Massachusetts. The first trial ended in a hung jury due to a deadlock among jurors. Judge Sullivan concluded there was "manifest necessity" for declaring a mistrial and that retrying Clancy would not violate her right against double jeopardy. This decision clears the way for potential retrial proceedings next year.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Case Retrial Clears Way” on 2026-11-10, grounded in this article and the 9 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 139707 · logged 2026-11-10

Story

Lindsay Clancy Murder Case Retrial Clears Way
Crime & Law · 10 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
Hedges 3 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 67/100
BBC News
Hedges 5 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
South China Morning Post
Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 62/100
The Independent
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 65/100
Just The News
Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 95/100
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 4 of 21 claims Outlet record 67/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
2 of 13 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
10
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 18457 article(s) · 39 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 39 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Priscilla DeGregory
30 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Jury selection for the highly-anticipated case against Robinson — who’s accused of killing the 31-year-old conservative activist in front of a crowd of thousands — is set to begin on June 21, 2028, Judge Tony Graf decided on Monday.
Judge William Sullivan’s rulings likely mean Clancy will face a second murder trial for strangling her three kids — possibly as soon as early spring.
Reddington argued at trial that Clancy couldn’t be held criminally responsible because she was in the throes of severe postpartum psychosis, made worse by a slew of prescription psychiatric drugs, when she strangled kids Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, before she tried to kill herself.
The probe was closed in 2021 by the Biden administration — two years after she entered Congress — after authorities determined the alleged crime was outside a five-year statute of limitations, meaning it would have had to have been charged in 2014 at the latest.
The court papers did not say who might have been on the other end of the phone at the time, exactly what was said or who recorded it.
Judge William Sullivan told the jury to keep at it, but the following day they sent out a similar note saying, “After much deliberation, we are still unable to come to a unanimous decision.”
“Once her 5th Amendment issues are resolved one way or the other, she will testify that she told these defendants explicitly that she had homicidal ideation [and] that she was worried about something awful happening to her kids,” Cooper said.
Vincent Battiloro’s attorneys told a judge that they would bring up the teen’s mental health to try to get him off the hook for killing 17-year-old Cranford High School seniors Maria Niotis and Isabella Salas on Sept. 29, 2025.
Chilling new photos and maps surfaced Monday from the New Jersey crash that killed NHL star Johnny Gaudreau and his brother — and suggest the alleged drunken driver may not have been reckless when he smashed into them, the defense said.
The Post could not confirm whether the man in the video was the alleged assailant or had anything to do with the incident.
Also by Priscilla DeGregory
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 30 articles by Priscilla DeGregory →

Topics

Clancy Duxbury Massachusetts Plymouth

Subjects

Clancy PERSON · 7× Sullivan PERSON · 3× Doe PERSON · 2× Massachusetts GPE · 2× Duxbury GPE · 1× Lindsay Clancy’s PERSON · 1× Michael Desronvil PERSON · 1× Plymouth GPE · 1× Tim Cruz PERSON · 1× William Sullivan PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The main question that is left open, is whether Plymouth District Attorney Tim Cruz will opt to retry the 36-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mom on the same first-degree murder charges she faced the first time around or whether he will downgrade them to second-degree murder.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-10
Judge William Sullivan’s rulings likely mean Clancy will face a second murder trial for strangling her three kids — possibly as soon as early spring.

Claims (13 extracted, 2 hedged)

A Massachusetts judge Monday shot down two of Lindsay Clancy’s’ big legal gambits, including refusing to dismiss her murder case because of a controversial holdout juror who caused a mistrial. asserted
who → shoot → mistrial
Judge William Sullivan’s rulings likely mean Clancy will face a second murder trial for strangling her three kids — possibly as soon as early spring. uncertain
Clancy → mean → spring
The main question that is left open, is whether Plymouth District Attorney Tim Cruz will opt to retry the 36-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mom on the same first-degree murder charges she faced the first time around or whether he will downgrade them to second-degree murder. asserted
he → leave → murder
Sullivan denied Clancy’s bid to toss out the case completely finding the defense arguments unpersuasive that double jeopardy prevented the case from going to trial again. asserted
jeopardy → deny → trial
Clancy’s team claimed that the lone holdout juror in favor of convicting her should have been probed further during deliberations when the foreperson sent out a note claiming he refused to follow the law on reasonable doubt. asserted
he → claim → doubt
That juror potentially could have been dismissed and replaced with another jury, allowing the panel to reach a verdict, Clancy’s lawyers argued. uncertain
lawyers → dismiss → verdict
Sullivan found he couldn’t have questioned the juror beyond asking him, and all the rest of the jury, if they were able to follow his instructions on reasonable doubt. asserted
they → find → doubt
If he had, it would have risked coercing the juror and imposing into the deliberation process. asserted
it → have → process
“Based on the imperative to avoid intrusion into the substance of deliberations and to avoid jury coercion, the court, in its discretion, concluded that it was inappropriate to investigate by questioning the holdout juror about any doubt Juror Doe harbored,” the judge wrote. asserted
judge → base → doubt
He also denied Clancy’s bid to get trial information about the juror, including his pre-trial questionnaire and a look into his prior arrest. asserted
He → deny → arrest
“Clancy has failed to explain how materials showing alleged misconduct by Juror Doe are relevant to any retrial of the murder indictments in front of a different jury,” Sullivan wrote in the other decision. asserted
Sullivan → fail → decision
The sole holdout has since been publicly identified as Michael Desronvil. asserted
holdout → identify → Desronvil
He has maintained he had “zero doubt” about Clancy’s guilt. asserted
he → maintain → guilt
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support