Photo via New York Post

Lindsay Clancy judge slaps down her hotshot lawyer after he names holdout juror in court

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

DeGregory, P. (2026, November 2). Lindsay Clancy judge slaps down her hotshot lawyer after he names holdout juror in court. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/02/us-news/judge-gives-lindsay-clancys-lawyer-stern-warning-about-holdout-juror/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-02 · by Priscilla DeGregory

Quick Summary

In a Massachusetts courtroom on Monday, Judge Sullivan reprimanded Lindsay Clancy's attorney Alex Reddington for publicly disclosing the identity of the holdout juror who caused a mistrial in Clancy’s case. The judge instructed Reddington to refer to the juror only as "Juror Doe." Prosecutors and Clancy’s legal team debated whether the entire case should be dismissed due to potential misconduct by Desronvil, the lone juror who refused to acquit Clancy of murdering her three children.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Lindsay Clancy returned to Massachusetts court on November 2, 2026, for a hearing that could determine whether she will face retrial for killing her three young children. Prosecutors are urging Judge William Sullivan to reject Clancy's motion to dismiss the charges, arguing they should be allowed to seek justice for Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy. The first trial ended in deadlock due to a holdout juror who refused to change his vote despite prosecutors' claims of sufficient evidence proving premeditation. On Monday, Judge Sullivan scheduled another hearing on November 16 to rule on motions that could shape the retrial's proceedings or potentially dismiss the charges entirely. Clancy's defense asserts that retrying her would violate her constitutional rights against double jeopardy and subject her to undue burdens and dangers highlighted by previous Supreme Judicial Court rulings.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Returns To Court For Hearing” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 18 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 123860 · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Lindsay Clancy Returns To Court For Hearing
Crime & Law · 19 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 3 of 43 claims Outlet record 64/100
New York Post
Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different parts of the ongoing legal proceedings, with Article A focusing on prosecutors' motion to reject the defense's dismissal request and Article B detailing a judge reprimanding Clancy’s lawyer for naming a holdout juror in court.”
NBC News
Hedges 3 of 33 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of Lindsay Clancy's legal proceedings on the same day, but they are distinct events: one about a hearing regarding double jeopardy and retrial, and another about a judge reprimanding her lawyer for naming a juror.”
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 25 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the legal proceedings related to Lindsay Clancy, but they do not appear to be reporting on the exact same incident at the same time.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles describe different court hearings related to Lindsay Clancy's case but do not clearly refer to the same specific incident and time.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the legal proceedings; one focuses on the judge reprimanding the lawyer for naming a juror, while the other discusses efforts to drop the murder charges following a mistrial.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
3 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
19
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16258 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Priscilla DeGregory
27 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Reddington argued at trial that Clancy couldn’t be held criminally responsible because she was in the throes of severe postpartum psychosis, made worse by a slew of prescription psychiatric drugs, when she strangled kids Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, before she tried to kill herself.
🔮 The probe was closed in 2021 by the Biden administration — two years after she entered Congress — after authorities determined the alleged crime was outside a five-year statute of limitations, meaning it would have had to have been charged in 2014 at the latest.
🔮 The court papers did not say who might have been on the other end of the phone at the time, exactly what was said or who recorded it.
🔮 Judge William Sullivan told the jury to keep at it, but the following day they sent out a similar note saying, “After much deliberation, we are still unable to come to a unanimous decision.”
🔮 “Once her 5th Amendment issues are resolved one way or the other, she will testify that she told these defendants explicitly that she had homicidal ideation [and] that she was worried about something awful happening to her kids,” Cooper said.
🔮 Vincent Battiloro’s attorneys told a judge that they would bring up the teen’s mental health to try to get him off the hook for killing 17-year-old Cranford High School seniors Maria Niotis and Isabella Salas on Sept. 29, 2025.
🔮 Chilling new photos and maps surfaced Monday from the New Jersey crash that killed NHL star Johnny Gaudreau and his brother — and suggest the alleged drunken driver may not have been reckless when he smashed into them, the defense said.
🔮 The Post could not confirm whether the man in the video was the alleged assailant or had anything to do with the incident.
🔮 Farwell killed Birchmore to ensure she couldn’t make good on threats to expose him to his wife about their seven-year sexual relationship, began with him abusing Birchmore when she was just 15, prosecutors alleged.
🔮 A London rape trial against British comedian and actor Russell Brand is slated to kick off Wednesday with jurors expected to hear opening statements in the case alleging the actor sexually assaulted six women.
Also by Priscilla DeGregory
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 27 articles by Priscilla DeGregory →

Topics

Clancy Desronvil Massachusetts Plymouth

Subjects

Clancy PERSON · 6× Desronvil PERSON · 6× Reddington PERSON · 5× Sullivan PERSON · 5× Weinberg PERSON · 3× Massachusetts GPE · 2× Cora PERSON · 1× Dawson PERSON · 1× Lindsay Clancy’s PERSON · 1× Plymouth GPE · 1×

Narrative

Reddington argued at trial that Clancy couldn’t be held criminally responsible because she was in the throes of severe postpartum psychosis, made worse by a slew of prescription psychiatric drugs, when she strangled kids Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, before she tried to kill herself.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 Reddington argued at trial that Clancy couldn’t be held criminally responsible because she was in the throes of severe postpartum psychosis, made worse by a slew of prescription psychiatric drugs, when she strangled kids Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, before she tried to kill herself.

Claims (23 extracted, 3 hedged)

A Massachusetts judge Monday gave a stern warning to Lindsay Clancy’s hotshot lawyer for publicly naming the holdout juror who sparked a mistrial, launching a tense exchange between the pair. asserted
who → give → pair
“I’m going to stop you right there,” Sullivan cut in. asserted
Sullivan → go → you
“No, you’re not,” said a defiant Reddington. asserted
Reddington → ’re → ?
“There is no need to bring out that juror’s name,” the judge said. asserted
judge → be → name
“He’s all over the internet,” Reddington retorted. asserted
Reddington → ’ → internet
The judge said going forward that Reddington was only to refer to Desronvil as “Juror Doe,” like everyone else had been doing. “We don’t need this,” the judge blasted. asserted
judge → say → this
The 36-year-old mother of three appeared in the Plymouth, Massachusetts courtroom Monday where prosecutors and her newly beefed-up legal team went head to head on a number of issues. asserted
prosecutors → appear → issues
Clancy’s side argued for the entire case against her to be tossed out because of potential misconduct with the holdout. asserted
case → argue → holdout
Meanwhile, prosecutors argued that the judge should issue a gag order after Reddington went on a press tour following the stunning Sept. 4, mistrial that ended with 11 jurors prepared to find Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity and only Desronvil wanting to convict her. asserted
Desronvil → argue → her
Reddington argued at trial that Clancy couldn’t be held criminally responsible because she was in the throes of severe postpartum psychosis, made worse by a slew of prescription psychiatric drugs, when she strangled kids Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, before she tried to kill herself. asserted
she → argue → herself
Prosecutors claimed she carefully plotted the slayings and knew what she was doing was wrong. asserted
doing → claim → what
After seven days of deliberations, Sullivan found the jury was hopelessly deadlocked, but not before the foreperson sent out two notes the day prior, alleging the holdout refused to follow the law on reasonable doubt. asserted
holdout → find → doubt
Desronvil has since come forward maintaining those claims are false and that he had “zero doubt” about Clancy’s guilt. uncertain
he → come → guilt
One of Clancy’s two new lawyers, Martin Weinberg, argued the first-degree murder charges against her should be dismissed because a more in depth probe should have been conducted on Desronvil before the mistrial was declared. asserted
mistrial → argue → Desronvil
Weinberg said the judge might have been forced to dismiss Desronvil from the jury if a grilling revealed misconduct, including potentially lying on his jury questionnaire and misusing his cell phone during the deliberation process. uncertain
grilling → say → process
Sullivan expressed skepticism about this argument when he pointed out that he questioned each of the jurors one-by-one — during a so-called voir dire — and asked them if they were able to follow his instructions on the law regarding reasonable doubt. “Didn’t I do that? asserted
I → express → that
Didn’t I do a voir dire? asserted
I → do → dire
Didn’t I swear them in?” the judge said. asserted
judge → swear → them
“So you’re saying I should have done it a second time?” Sullivan asked Weinberg. asserted
Sullivan → say → Weinberg
“Not to simply ask a single question but to make a probing voire dire,” Weinberg responded. asserted
Weinberg → ask → dire
Desronvil’s lawyer, Heather O’Connor, argued her client did nothing wrong and the only reason he was being targeted by the defense was because he “did not vote the way the defense needed.” asserted
defense → argue → defense
Sullivan said he would make rulings at a later date and said he’d announce his ruling on Clancy’s motion to dismiss at a Nov. 16 hearing. asserted
he → say → hearing
He said, if a new trial was required, the date could be chosen at their next meeting. uncertain
date → say → meeting
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support