That is 0 articles you have read today.
The Aporia is free and carries no advertising, so readers are the only
thing paying for it. If you are getting this much out of it, a small
donation is what keeps it independent.
Daily limit reached
You have read 0 articles today.
That is more than the 15 a day The Aporia gives away,
and well past what it can carry on nothing. Your allowance resets at
midnight.
There is no advertising here and nothing about you is sold, so readers
are the only thing paying for it. If the site is worth this much of
your day, it is worth a few dollars.
Everything else stays open: the
maps, the
directory and
search do
not count against this, and neither does re-opening something you have
already read today.
The Trump administration has cut or frozen up to $177 billion in federal grants since President Trump's second term began, affecting all 50 states and Washington D.C., according to a tracking tool called Lost Funds by the States United Democracy Center and Grant Witness. This figure represents nearly 10% of federal discretionary spending and includes disruptions in health, education, environmental, and disaster relief programs. The tracker identifies specific cuts such as maternal health funding in Michigan and assistance for minority farmers in Iowa, with California, Texas, New York, Illinois, and North Carolina experiencing the largest financial impacts.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-16,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
The Trump administration has cut or frozen up to $177 billion in federal grants across all 50 states and the District of Columbia since President Donald Trump began his second term. This figure, representing nearly 10 percent of federal discretionary spending, was revealed by a tracking tool called Lost Funds, launched by the States United Democracy Center and Grant Witness. The disrupted funding primarily affected health, nutrition, environmental programs, and disaster relief. Specific examples include cuts to maternal health programs in Michigan, education research in Mississippi, and aid for minority farmers in Iowa. California, Texas, New York, Illinois, and North Carolina experienced the highest amounts of interrupted grant money. The tool aims to highlight the significant impact these disruptions have had on various critical programs nationwide.
Written for “Trump Admin Cuts Federal Grants” on 2026-09-17,
grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted
verbatim and was checked against the article text before being
stored, so you can find it in the original.
-
The Trump administration has cut or frozen up to USD 177 billion in federal grants since President Donald Trump began his second term, with disruptions affecting all 50 states and the District of Columbia
left describes cuts negatively
-
Health, nutrition, environmental programmes and disaster relief accounted for the largest share of the disrupted funding. Grants for health, education, farmers affected
left emphasizes negative impact on social programs
-
The groups said the USD 177 billion figure represents nearly 10 per cent of federal discretionary spending. They also said the scale of the disruptions went beyond the cuts that typically occur when administrations change
left frames cuts as unusually severe
Leaning score -0.50 for article 13593 (medium confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-16
The Trump administration has cut or frozen up to USD 177 billion in federal grants since President Donald Trump began his second term, with disruptions affecting all 50 states and the District of Columbia, according to a tracking tool released by the States United Democracy Center and Grant Witness.
uncertain
Trump → cut → Center
According to the Associated Press, the figure was released through a new tracking tool called Lost Funds, launched by the States United Democracy Center and Grant Witness, a group of researchers and scientists.
uncertain
figure → accord → researchers
Health, nutrition, environmental programmes and disaster relief accounted for the largest share of the disrupted funding.
asserted
Health → account → funding
Grants for health, education, farmers affected
asserted
farmers → affect → health
The groups said grants that were eliminated, frozen or delayed included funding for maternal health programmes in Michigan, education research in Mississippi and assistance for minority farmers in Iowa.
asserted
that → say → Iowa
California, Texas, New York, Illinois and North Carolina recorded the highest amounts of interrupted federal grant money, according to the tracker.
uncertain
California → record → tracker
The groups said the USD 177 billion figure represents nearly 10 per cent of federal discretionary spending.
asserted
figure → say → spending
They also said the scale of the disruptions went beyond the cuts that typically occur when administrations change.
asserted
administrations → say → cuts
“By bringing thousands of funding disruptions from the Trump administration together in a publicly accessible, verified database, Lost Funds puts the magnitude of their impact on full display,” Scott Delaney, co-founder of Grant Witness, said.
asserted
Delaney → bring → Witness
Tracker to be updated
asserted
Tracker → update → ?
The Lost Funds tool relies on data from USASpending.gov, a public source of federal spending information, according to its methodology.
uncertain
tool → rely → methodology
The organisers said it would be updated as the administration takes further action and as lawsuits over the funding cuts move through the courts.
asserted
lawsuits → say → courts
In some cases, courts have ruled against the administration's grant funding cuts.
asserted
courts → rule → cuts
Kelly Rader, research director at the States United Democracy Center, said the tracker showed the impact of the funding disruptions on states and their residents.
asserted
tracker → say → states
The States United Democracy Center describes itself as a nonpartisan group focused on the rule of law and elections.
asserted
Center → describe → law
Grant Witness comprises scientists, researchers and attorneys who track changes in federal funding under the Trump administration.
asserted
who → comprise → administration