Photo via Reason

Mary Peltola Appears Likely To Defeat Both Dan Sullivans in Alaska's Senate Race

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Lancaster, J. (2026, November 6). Mary Peltola Appears Likely To Defeat Both Dan Sullivans in Alaska's Senate Race. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/11/06/mary-peltola-appears-likely-to-defeat-both-dan-sullivans-in-alaskas-senate-race/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-11-06 · by Joe Lancaster

Quick Summary

Alaska's U.S. Senate race remains unresolved days after the midterm elections, with Democratic challenger Mary Peltola leading Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan by less than a percentage point based on about three-quarters of votes counted. The race became complex due to the involvement of another candidate named Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., who Democrats believe attracted votes meant for Republicans to confuse them, potentially affecting the outcome. Preliminary results indicate that voters ranking Peltola as their second choice rather than Sullivan may secure her victory, with significant numbers of ballots left unprocessed and counting ongoing until November 18th.
Written by AI on 2026-11-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 6, 2026, the U.S. Senate race in Alaska remains unresolved with Democratic challenger Mary Peltola leading Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan by 626 votes (about three-tenths of one percent) based on around 74% of votes counted. The state's unique ranked-choice voting system means a final winner will not be determined until all ballots are counted and processed through multiple rounds, potentially taking weeks to finalize results. CBS News has not called the race, and it includes two other candidates: an independent and another Republican named Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., who was recruited by Democrats to split votes among Republicans. President Trump had pushed for legal action against Peltola and Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., but a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit earlier in the week. With no clear winner yet, Alaska could determine which party controls the U.S. Senate after Democrats secured enough seats elsewhere already.

Written for “Alaska Senate Race Unresolved” on 2026-11-07, grounded in this article and the 5 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Alaska Senate Race Unresolved
Politics · 6 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 60/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 36 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Mary Peltola's political career and election situation, rather than a single specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Alaska Senate race: one covers a judge dismissing Trump's lawsuit to delay certification, while the other reports on the current status and results of the race itself.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 3 of 32 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses Dan Sullivan's personal ties to a donor of his opponent, Mary Peltola, while Article B focuses on the ongoing election results and the race dynamics between Peltola and the two Dan Sullivans.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The first article describes the ongoing vote count on election day, while the second reports on the status of the race days after the election with a different outcome and more complete vote tally.”
CBS News
Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses voter confusion about multiple candidates named Dan Sullivan, while Article B reports on the election results and standing of Mary Peltola against both Dan Sullivans.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different points in time during the ongoing election; Article A reports on the situation on November 5, while Article B updates on the status a day later.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 31 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses a lawsuit related to ballot certification, while Article B reports on vote tallies and results of the election.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss Alaska's Senate race, Article A provides an overview of races in general without specifying results or timing, whereas Article B focuses on the outcome and status of the specific race days after the election.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 5 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes an accusation made by Dan Sullivan hours before polls closed, while Article B reports on the results and ongoing scrutiny of the vote count days after the election.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
5 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
6
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1207 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Joe Lancaster
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 "Mr. Sullivan might not even claw back half of a point in ranked-choice tabulation, which would not be enough to overcome Ms. Peltola's expected advantage," reports The New York Times.
🔮 Even if given a choice between Hitler and Mao as major-party candidates and saints running on third-party or independent tickets, voters will almost always confine their votes to one or the other incarnation of evil.
🔮 Granted, a president's party is expected to lose seats in the midterms.
🔮 But along with Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan and Democratic challenger Mary Peltola, the ballot will include two other candidates, including a second Dan Sullivan—retired schoolteacher Daniel J. Sullivan.
🔮 "If the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them," Trump pledged in September, "I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000."
🔮 Then earlier this year, Rogers again got the feeling that he could be doing something beneficial with his talents.
🔮 Even if the complaint were valid, it would be difficult to enforce without violating the First Amendment.
🔮 "This is why MAGA, and REAL Patriots, will never like Fox!
🔮 Many major American cities struggle with homelessness, and with no single clear or obvious solution, it's unlikely the problem will be solved anytime soon.
2026-09-30 · assertive framing · Why Is Seattle Keeping Her From Cleaning Up Trash?
🔮 (The Institute for Justice, a public-interest law firm, drafted model legislation that would require the officer to get a warrant to access any images older than 24 hours.)
Also by Joe Lancaster
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Joe Lancaster →

Topics

Alaska Democratic Democrats Republican U.S. Senate

Subjects

Sullivan PERSON · 13× Peltola PERSON · 11× Dan Sullivan PERSON · 3× Alaska GPE · 2× Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Times ORG · 2× Democratic NORP · 1× Mary Peltola PERSON · 1× U.S. Senate ORG · 1×

Narrative

Even in this campaign cycle when he's not on the ballot, Trump's administration has tried to meddle in states' counting processes: Before Election Day, his Department of Justice tried to force Alaska to segregate all ballots that voted for the other Dan Sullivan, in order to conduct some sort of "investigation" into whether each voter actually meant to vote for the incumbent senator.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-06
🔮 "Mr. Sullivan might not even claw back half of a point in ranked-choice tabulation, which would not be enough to overcome Ms. Peltola's expected advantage," reports The New York Times.

Claims (38 extracted, 5 hedged)

Days after the midterm elections, one of the only national races still left to be resolved is the U.S. Senate race in Alaska. asserted
one → leave → Alaska
As of this writing, with about three-fourths of the votes tallied, Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan trails Democratic challenger Mary Peltola by just over 600 votes—three tenths of a percentage point—with the two remaining candidates trailing further behind, with just a couple of percentage points each. asserted
candidates → tally → points
The race received intense scrutiny in its final days after it came to light that the Peltola campaign and other Democrats recruited current fourth-place finisher Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. specifically to siphon votes from Republicans confused about which Dan Sullivan to vote for. asserted
campaign → receive → Sullivan
President Donald Trump called for Peltola and the other Sullivan to be criminally prosecuted. asserted
Peltola → call → ?
The Department of Justice sued, asking the state to set aside ballots that picked the non-incumbent Sullivan. asserted
that → sue → Sullivan
(A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit earlier this week.) asserted
judge → dismiss → lawsuit
There are still plenty of votes left to count, but it appears unlikely for Sullivan—either one—to pull out a victory. asserted
Sullivan → be → victory
Not only that, it seems like he's losing fair and square. asserted
he → seem → ?
For its general elections, Alaska uses a ranked-choice ballot, listing up to four candidates for each office regardless of party affiliation. asserted
Alaska → use → affiliation
Voters rank the candidates in order of preference. asserted
Voters → rank → preference
In the event that nobody receives an outright majority when the votes are counted, the lowest performer is eliminated, and all of their ballots are retallied and assigned to their second choices. asserted
all → receive → choices
Besides that, even just collecting and processing ballots in such a large and mostly rural state means it'll take a while. asserted
it → collect → while
The state must count all ballots by November 18—15 days after Election Day—and it has another seven days to certify the results. asserted
it → count → results
But the state released preliminary results this week on the approximately 215,000 votes it had collected, which suggests people who voted for the other Sullivan did so not out of confusion, but to vote against the incumbent. uncertain
who → release → incumbent
"Mr. Sullivan might not even claw back half of a point in ranked-choice tabulation, which would not be enough to overcome Ms. Peltola's expected advantage," reports The New York Times. uncertain
Times → claw → advantage
"One reason Mr. Sullivan doesn't fare better is that more of the voters who backed the other Dan Sullivan…ranked Ms. Peltola as their second choice rather than Mr. Sullivan. asserted
who → fare → Sullivan
The Times analyzed the data available, which includes all but about 10,000 ballots that could not be scanned electronically and must be counted by hand. uncertain
that → analyze → hand
Only about four percent of ballots ranked someone other than Peltola or Sullivan first. asserted
percent → rank → Peltola
Of those who picked the other Sullivan, over one-third left the rest blank, nearly 30 percent picked Peltola second, and 16 percent and 18 percent picked the incumbent Sullivan and fellow Republican Gerald Heikes, respectively. asserted
percent → pick → Sullivan
This suggests that at least 16 percent, and perhaps as many as 34 percent, of voters followed the senator's advice to just list all the candidates other than Peltola and let the process sort it out. uncertain
process → suggest → it
It also indicates nearly three in 10 voters who picked the spoiler Sullivan actually did intend to vote for Peltola, and ranked her second. asserted
who → indicate → her
Of the voters who picked Heikes first, 36 percent picked Sullivan second, and a nearly identical amount left the rest blank; 14 percent picked the other Sullivan, while 12 percent chose Peltola. asserted
percent → pick → Peltola
Of course, there is the matter of the 36 percent who picked the other Sullivan and nobody else—were those protest votes, or confused voters? Thankfully, there is reason to think the Peltola campaign's dirty trick did not actually sway the results: asserted
trick → be → results
"Even if all the voters who voted for Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. and did not rank a second choice at all had actually intended to vote for the incumbent," the Times added, "he would only gain about one percentage point in vote margin—an increase that would not offset Ms. Peltola's expected gains from uncounted mail vote." asserted
that → vote → vote
Of course, that hasn't stopped Trump from fulminating over the results. asserted
that → stop → results
"The vote totals for the Fake Dan Sullivan, plus the other 'slug' that the Dems put on the Ballot, should be immediately given to the REAL Dan Sullivan, and the Election is over asserted
Election → put → Sullivan
- He easily wins," the president wrote on Truth Social. asserted
president → win → Social
While we're at it, why not just give him Peltola's votes too and declare a unanimous victory? asserted
we → give → victory
This impotent posturing is Trump's natural response when he comes up short in elections. asserted
he → come → elections
After he won the 2016 election but lost the popular vote, Trump complained that if not for "the millions of people who voted illegally," he would have won both. asserted
he → win → both
Then, before the 2020 election, he reportedly indicated that he planned to just declare victory before all the votes were counted—which he then did, as state totals were trending away from him. uncertain
totals → indicate → him
Even in this campaign cycle when he's not on the ballot, Trump's administration has tried to meddle in states' counting processes: Before Election Day, his Department of Justice tried to force Alaska to segregate all ballots that voted for the other Dan Sullivan, in order to conduct some sort of "investigation" into whether each voter actually meant to vote for the incumbent senator. asserted
voter → try → senator
And this week, attorneys for Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R–Miss.) sent a letter to election officials in Mississippi, where Democratic challenger Scott Colom currently leads Hyde-Smith by about two-tenths of a percentage point. asserted
Colom → send → point
Hyde-Smith's attorneys wrote "to demand the immediate separation, secure custody, and preservation" of all provisional ballots, in the event of a lawsuit challenging the results. asserted
attorneys → write → results
As Madeline Nguyen of Mississippi Today reported in April, Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson contracted with Experian to verify voters' eligibility even as the company warned that it couldn't guarantee the data was reliable. asserted
data → report → eligibility
As a result, thousands were likely removed from the voter rolls erroneously and had to cast provisional ballots. asserted
thousands → remove → ballots
Both before and since the election, Trump complained about the Alaska Senate race, saying the Peltola campaign had committed fraud and must be punished. asserted
campaign → complain → fraud
Ultimately, it looks like Peltola will win not because of malfeasance, but because voters simply liked her opponent less. asserted
voters → look → opponent
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support