Photo via Fox News

We need to abolish the College Football Playoff selection committee after yet another embarrassment

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Miller, I. (2026, November 5). We need to abolish the College Football Playoff selection committee after yet another embarrassment. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/abolish-college-football-playoff-selection-committee-embarrassment

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-11-05 · by Ian Miller

Quick Summary

The author argues that the College Football Playoff selection committee's poll ranking system is deeply flawed and inconsistent, citing examples like Alabama being ranked too high at No. 5 despite its mediocre performance, while UCLA and other deserving teams are under-ranked. The piece criticizes the lack of transparency in the committee’s decision-making process and highlights biases among athletic directors who serve on the committee.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The College Football Playoff selection committee has faced severe criticism for its recent poll rankings, deemed an embarrassment by some critics. The latest Associated Press Top 25 Poll and the College Football Playoff poll have been criticized for inconsistency and bias, with the latter being particularly scrutinized as it directly influences playoff eligibility. Critics argue that using school athletic directors on the selection committee introduces significant biases due to personal stakes and conference affiliations. For instance, rankings such as Alabama (7th in a more objective ranking) and Tennessee are seen as unrepresentative of team performance. The suggestion is to abolish the current system and create one with clear metrics for transparency and fairness.

Written for “College Football Playoff Controversy” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 131428 (high confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 College Football Playoff Controversy
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of college football rankings; one reports on the release of the first official College Football Playoff rankings, while the other expresses opinions about the selection committee and its perceived flaws.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 1 of 41 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss confusion regarding the initial CFP rankings, they do not describe the same specific incident as Article B mentions additional issues with the Associated Press Top 25 Poll and preseason polls.”
Fox News
Hedges 9 of 34 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the CFP rankings process; Article A focuses on the impact of the rankings on Notre Dame and SEC, while Article B criticizes the overall selection committee and process.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 41 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss the 2026 College Football Playoff rankings, they are written on different days and have distinct viewpoints and emphases.”
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 30 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss similar issues related to rankings but describe different points in time and distinct criticisms.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss similar issues with college football polls but describe different incidents: one focuses on the Associated Press Top 25 poll, and the other critiques the College Football Playoff selection committee.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
64
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
5 of 64 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6715 article(s) · 13 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 13 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ian Miller
49 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Well, opinions vary, but a preferable outcome would be a transparent process with clearly communicated metrics and measurements.
🔮 Some on the optimistic side believe that the two sides will find a way to come to an agreement before games are canceled.
🔮 That this lockout wouldn't be like the others, because baseball needs a salary cap, the league said.
🔮 You could make the case that the Gators deserve to be in the top 25 had their three losses been even remotely close.
🔮 Maybe the BYU Cougars being a religious school can pay some dividends.
🔮 When set up with a first-and-goal inside the 1-yard-line, the Buckeyes still couldn't get in the end zone.
🔮 To say that expectations were high at USC heading into the 2026 college football season would be an understatement.
🔮 But he hit the ground hard while colliding with Panthers cornerback Will Lee III, and was slow to get up.
🔮 While William Contreras won World Series MVP, voters had plenty of options to choose from on the Milwaukee roster.
🔮 If that doesn't sum up Milwaukee's postseason run, it's hard to imagine what would.
Also by Ian Miller
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 49 articles by Ian Miller →

Topics

Alabama College Football Playoff Kentucky South Carolina Tennessee

Subjects

Alabama GPE · 4× Kentucky GPE · 3× Mississippi State GPE · 3× Ohio State ORG · 3× Texas GPE · 3× Indiana GPE · 2× LSU ORG · 2× Oklahoma GPE · 2× South Carolina GPE · 2× Tennessee GPE · 2×

Narrative

For some context, here's how those rankings, again, a more objective set, shook out: - Miami - Georgia - Utah - Indiana - Notre Dame - Alabama - Ohio State - UCLA - Texas - LSU - Wake Forest - Ole Miss - BYU - Texas Tech - Kentucky - Tennessee - Boise State - USC - Houston - Iowa - Northwestern - Missouri - Arizona - Florida - Oregon If at first glance it seems like one conference keeps consistently over-performing its computer metrics, that's because there is one conference being consistently overrated by the selection committee: the SEC.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 Well, opinions vary, but a preferable outcome would be a transparent process with clearly communicated metrics and measurements.

Claims (64 extracted, 5 hedged)

It's time to shut the whole thing down and start over. asserted
It → shut → thing
That's the only lesson to take away from the first installment of the College Football Playoff selection committee poll and what a debacle it, and the entire process, has proven to be. asserted
it → take → debacle
As with most seasons, the Associated Press Top 25 Poll has been a disaster, with no consistent ranking philosophy, certain conferences enjoying an unearned boost among voters based on Nick Saban's coaching in the 2010s and an overreliance on preseason polls that mean nothing and are hopelessly inaccurate. asserted
that → enjoy → nothing
But this week's College Football Playoff poll is so bad it made the Associated Press look competent. asserted
Press → make → ?
There's just one problem: This poll is what actually matters. asserted
what → be → ?
The other is using school athletic directors, who are subject to their own biases, to be the public face of the committee. asserted
who → use → committee
But we'll get back to that. asserted
we → get → that
The Alabama Crimson Tide have no case to be No. 5 in anything, let alone the College Football Playoff poll. asserted
Tide → have → anything
Ohio State is No. 12, while the team they just lost to is No. 20. asserted
they → lose → ?
Indiana is No. 4 for some reason, and Texas has been given a complete free pass after two horrific losses, including to an awful, legitimately terrible, Oklahoma team. asserted
Texas → give → team
Seemingly what happened here is that the committee members sat down for a few hours, talked about their vacation homes and golf memberships, then threw some team names in a hat, tossed it in the air and ranked based on which piece of carpet they landed on. asserted
they → happen → carpet
What should have happened? asserted
What → happen → ?
Well, opinions vary, but a preferable outcome would be a transparent process with clearly communicated metrics and measurements. asserted
outcome → vary → metrics
Instead, we have some vague references to a "strength of conference" number. asserted
we → have → number
Which has never actually been defined for anyone. asserted
Which → define → anyone
Instead, what we got is Hunter Yurachek rambling nonsense about Alabama's quality wins and quality losses. asserted
Yurachek → get → wins
"Yes, they had that loss to Tennessee. asserted
they → have → Tennessee
But Tennessee doesn't have that same level of quality wins. asserted
Tennessee → have → wins
Yes, they beat Alabama, but you have to go deeper," he said while "explaining" the difference in ranking between the Tide and Volunteers. asserted
he → beat → Tide
Therein lies the problem. asserted
problem → lie → ?
The committee gives credit for "quality wins" based on their rankings. asserted
committee → give → rankings
South Carolina is good, they say, because we ranked them. asserted
we → say → them
Kentucky is a top quality win, they say, because we ranked them No. 6. asserted
we → say → them
That's circuitous "logic" and it undermines the entire credibility of the process. asserted
it → undermine → process
The committee seems to be saying Mississippi State would be good if not for injuries. asserted
State → seem → injuries
But no other conference is afforded that same deference, assumption or apparent dismissal of the Bulldogs’ epic defensive collapse. asserted
conference → afford → collapse
Just look at how Mississippi State has played of late: - Lost 56-23 to Alabama - Lost 31-0 to LSU - Lost 23-15 to Oklahoma - Lost 31-3 to Texas This is what the committee gives Alabama credit for. asserted
committee → look → credit
Does Kamario Taylor play defense too? asserted
Taylor → play → defense
Would he have stopped his team from allowing over 35 points per game? asserted
he → stop → game
Or are they just making things up as they go? asserted
they → make → things
Ole Miss gets credit for their wins over No. 14 LSU and No. 18 Missouri, but little punishment for losing to Texas and the laughably ranked three-loss Gators. asserted
Miss → get → Texas
Yet Ohio State has a win over No. 4 Indiana and No. 19 Iowa, and their two losses are to the same No. 7 Texas team and No. 20 USC. asserted
losses → have → team
How does that justify one team at No. 10 and the other at No. 12? asserted
that → justify → .
Well Yurachek had some brilliance to share there too. asserted
Yurachek → have → brilliance
According to his explanation, the Buckeyes didn't look like the same team after Julian Sayin's injury, and they gave up "explosive plays" to the Trojans in their 30-18 loss. uncertain
they → accord → loss
There's just one problem, the Rebels have been worse at giving up explosive plays than Ohio State. asserted
Rebels → be → State
As one post on X noted, OSU "allowed two 40+ yard plays in that game, its first two such plays allowed this season." asserted
OSU → note → game
Ole Miss has allowed 10 plays of 40+ yards this year. asserted
Miss → allow → yards
If that sounds like they're just making it up as they go, it's because they are. asserted
they → sound → it
But we also have some data to demonstrate how absurd, and absurdly slanted and biased these rankings are. asserted
rankings → have → data
…and 24 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support