Photo via The Bulwark

Exit Polls: Trump Is Why Republicans Lost

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
Cite

Saletan, W. (2026, November 5). Exit Polls: Trump Is Why Republicans Lost. The Bulwark. https://www.thebulwark.com/p/exit-polls-trump-is-why-republicans-lost-midterms-2026-blue-wave

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Bulwark · collected 2026-11-05 · by Will Saletan commentary

Quick Summary

No summary of this article yet; the story summary below covers the event.

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 3, 2026, the U.S. midterm elections concluded with a decisive victory for the Democratic Party, which took control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, stripping President Donald Trump's Republican party of their majorities in Congress. Democrats secured over 260 seats in the House and at least 56 seats in the Senate, marking a significant shift from previous expectations that they would only capture one chamber.

The elections were held amid rising concerns about affordability issues under Trump’s presidency, despite his reassurances to the contrary. Voter turnout was near-record high, with over 122 million ballots counted, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction among Americans with the state of the country and policies enacted during Trump's term.

Political analysts had initially predicted a challenging path for Democrats due to factors like voter fatigue and regional strongholds traditionally supporting Republicans. However, Democratic candidates performed exceptionally well across several previously Republican-held states such as Texas, South Carolina, and Kansas.

This outcome could significantly impact U.S. domestic policy over the next two years but may also escalate existing trade tensions and conflicts with global partners like China, given Trump’s continued hardline stance on foreign relations despite the new political landscape in Washington.

Written for “US Midterm Elections Results” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 721 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 130937 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 US Midterm Elections Results
Politics · 722 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
Hedges 4 of 58 claims Outlet record 71/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Trump's influence on Republican voters and his candidacy, rather than describing the exact same incident or outcome.”
The Independent
Hedges 0 of 8 claims Outlet record 59/100
Global News
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 50 claims Outlet record 63/100
BBC News
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss reactions to the 2026 midterm election results, Article A focuses on Trump's immediate reaction and analysis of the outcomes, whereas Article B delves into exit poll analyses and critiques of Trump's impact on Republican losses.”
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 67 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Republicans blaming Trump for their election defeat, Article A reports on immediate reactions right after the election results were known, while Article B cites exit polls and provides a delayed analysis of reasons behind the loss.”
NBC News
Outlet record 78/100
“Article A reports on Trump's immediate reaction to the midterm results, while Article B discusses broader analysis and context provided by exit polls.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss Republican reactions to a recent electoral defeat and mention criticism of Trump, they describe different aspects of the situation rather than the exact same incident.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 9 of 66 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss the outcome and implications of the same midterm election where Democrats gained control of the Senate, they describe different aspects of the event — one focusing on the results and another on Trump's reaction and exit poll analysis.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 52 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and angles of the Republican losses in the 2026 midterm elections, but do not describe the exact same specific event or incident occurring at the same time.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
53
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 53 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
722
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Bulwark · 606 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Will Saletan
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “I wasn’t on the Ballot,” he wrote on Truth Social, “and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!”
2026-11-05 · assertive framing · Exit Polls: Trump Is Why Republicans Lost
🔮 WHEN WILL WE KNOW the outcome of the midterm elections?
2026-11-03 · mixed framing · Heads We Win, Tails You’re Decertified
🔮 Collins essentially concedes that the pain inflicted by her own party will go on, and that all she can do is lessen it.
2026-10-20 · assertive framing · The Case Against Susan Collins
🔮 Susan Collins Couldn't Answer One Simple Question About Trump
🔮 Jack Smith Reveals the Words That Could Have Buried Trump Will Saletan lays out the case against Donald Trump that Jack Smith never got to present at trial.
🔮 Will Saletan and Joe Perticone take on the strange fight, the golf-industry interests behind it, and why Trump is picking on one of his own loyal allies with Republicans already staring down a brutal midterm environment.
🔮 The committee’s senators, listening to Smith’s remarks, could have chosen to identify with the honest Republicans he cited as models.
2026-09-30 · assertive framing · Jack Smith and the Republican Smear Squad
🔮 In the first ad, he declares, “Together we will defeat communism, socialism, and Marxism in America.”
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · Congratulations, You’re a Trump Campaign Donor
🔮 Will Saletan meticulously breaks down Todd Blanche’s defense of Trump’s press crackdown, Mike Waltz getting confronted with the president’s own words, and the shifting story about the war with Iran.
🔮 Will Saletan runs their own definition of “communism” against Donald Trump’s promises of $5,000 checks, government stakes in private companies, admiration for China, and even his jokes about being “the greatest communist in history”—and finds the GOP’s argument collapsing under its own weight.
Also by Will Saletan
The Case Against Susan Collins
2026-10-20 · The Bulwark
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Will Saletan →

Topics

Democrats House Republican Republicans Truth Social

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 17× House ORG · 7× Republicans NORP · 4× Americans NORP · 3× DONALD TRUMP PERSON · 3× Democrats NORP · 3× MAGA ORG · 3× Republican NORP · 2× Reuters/Ipsos ORG · 2× Truth Social ORG · 1×

Narrative

The exit polls from the past three midterms prove it.1 The simplest index of Trump’s effect is an explicit question in the exit polls: “Was one reason for your vote for U.S. House today to express support for Donald Trump,” was it “to express opposition to Donald Trump,” or was he “not a factor”?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 “I wasn’t on the Ballot,” he wrote on Truth Social, “and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!”
2026-11-05 · The Bulwark
Exit Polls: Trump Is Why Republicans Lost · assertive framing

Claims (53 extracted, 0 hedged)

DONALD TRUMP RESPONDED to Tuesday’s Republican debacle with his usual humility. asserted
TRUMP → respond → humility
“I wasn’t on the Ballot,” he wrote on Truth Social, “and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!” asserted
we → write → LANDSLIDE
He’s full of it. asserted
He → ’ → it
For weeks, at pre-election rallies, Trump told voters to act as though he were on the ballot. asserted
he → tell → ballot
And they did. asserted
they → do → ?
Some conservatives voted for him, but many stayed home. asserted
many → vote → him
And tens of millions of Americans came out to vote against him. asserted
millions → come → him
Trump killed his own party. asserted
Trump → kill → party
The exit polls from the past three midterms prove it.1 The simplest index of Trump’s effect is an explicit question in the exit polls: “Was one reason for your vote for U.S. House today to express support for Donald Trump,” was it “to express opposition to Donald Trump,” or was he “not a factor”? asserted
he → prove → Trump
In 2018, voters who said they were expressing opposition to Trump outnumbered those who were expressing support, 38 percent to 26 percent. asserted
who → say → percent
In 2022, the AP and network exit polls diverged somewhat, but again, both found that opposers outnumbered supporters by about 12 points. asserted
opposers → diverge → points
Forty-four percent of voters in House races said they were expressing opposition to Trump; only 16 percent said they were expressing support for him. asserted
they → say → him
That’s a 28-point gap, more than twice the previous margin. asserted
That → ’ → ?
When you compute how many votes that gap cost House Republicans, it works out to more than a quarter of the electorate. asserted
it → compute → electorate
In all three midterms of the Trump era, including the 2022 midterm when he was out of office, Trump has weighed down his party. asserted
Trump → include → party
Each time, most people who said he wasn’t a factor voted for House Republicans. asserted
he → say → Republicans
And each time, most people who said he was a factor voted for House Democrats. asserted
he → say → Democrats
Overwhelmingly, people who approve of his job performance vote for Republicans in the House, while those who disapprove of his job performance vote for Democrats. asserted
who → approve → Democrats
In 2018, roughly 45 percent of voters approved of Trump’s performance, while 55 percent disapproved. asserted
percent → approve → performance
Around 45 percent of voters strongly disapproved of him. asserted
percent → disapprove → him
In 2022, exit polls didn’t ask the approval question, because he wasn’t the president. asserted
he → ask → question
But this year, the question returned, and Trump’s numbers were far worse than before. asserted
numbers → return → ?
Only 37 percent of voters approved of his performance; 63 percent disapproved. asserted
percent → approve → performance
Fifty-four percent of voters strongly disapproved. asserted
percent → disapprove → voters
That’s a significant increase from his previous strong-disapproval number. asserted
That → ’ → number
Eighty-six percent of Trump disapprovers voted for House Democrats in this election. asserted
percent → vote → election
When you multiply the 63 percent by the 86 percent, you find that these people made up 54 percent of the electorate. asserted
people → multiply → electorate
Trump often brags that when he’s on the ballot, he brings out additional Republican voters who don’t show up in midterms. asserted
who → brag → midterms
That’s true. asserted
That → ’ → ?
But the extra turnout he generated in 2020 and 2024 masked an underlying decline in his support among the general population. asserted
he → generate → population
To take one example: In the final Reuters/Ipsos poll before the 2018 midterms, 41 percent of Americans approved of Trump’s performance in office; 53 percent disapproved. asserted
percent → take → office
In the final Reuters/Ipsos poll before this year’s midterms, only 32 percent approved of Trump’s performance; 64 percent disapproved. asserted
percent → approve → performance
That’s a plunge from minus-12 to minus-32. asserted
That → ’ → minus-32
And between the two polls, the percentage of Americans who “strongly” disapproved of Trump’s performance swelled from 38 percent to 50 percent. asserted
who → disapprove → percent
When the general population is two-to-one against a president, it’s unlikely—to put it charitably—that he would have benefited his party, on balance, by boosting turnout. asserted
he → ’ → turnout
A THIRD MEASURE of Trump’s waning power is the shrinkage of the MAGA vote. asserted
MEASURE → wan → vote
At his rallies in recent weeks, he routinely played a video clip of CNN analyst Harry Enten extolling Trump’s grip on the MAGA base. asserted
Enten → play → base
In the clip, Enten noted that 98 percent of self-identified MAGA supporters planned to vote for House Republicans. asserted
percent → note → Republicans
While gloating about the 98 percent, Trump missed the real story: As a share of the electorate, MAGA voters are in decline. asserted
voters → gloat → decline
In 2022, 32 percent of voters identified themselves as MAGA Republicans. asserted
percent → identify → Republicans
…and 13 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support