Photo via The Guardian

Miliband criticises Blair’s slavery statement and defends Burnham’s plan for proper apology – UK politics live

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Sparrow, A. (2026, November 4). Miliband criticises Blair’s slavery statement and defends Burnham’s plan for proper apology – UK politics live. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2026/nov/04/ed-miliband-andy-burnham-king-charles-labour-louise-haigh-alex-burghart-pmqs-conservatives-uk-politics-latest-news

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-04 · by Andrew Sparrow

Quick Summary

Ed Miliband criticized Tony Blair's approach to apologizing for the UK’s role in slavery, calling it a "sorry not sorry" situation during a BBC interview. Specifically addressing Andy Burnham’s initiative at the Commonwealth summit to seek a more substantial acknowledgment and formal apology, Miliband highlighted that previous attempts lacked sincerity, pointing to Blair’s 2006 statement as an example of inadequate response.
Written by AI on 2026-11-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Ed Miliband has criticized Tony Blair’s recent statement regarding historical slavery, defending Labour MP Andy Burnham's plan for a comprehensive apology instead. This comes amid ongoing tensions between Miliband and Blair, who were at odds during Miliband's tenure as party leader from 2010 to 2015 over criticisms of New Labour policies. Meanwhile, Burnham is attending the Commonwealth summit in Antigua, where discussions likely include the UK's relationship with other member nations and historical reparations. The political landscape remains complex, especially considering Donald Trump will continue his presidency for at least two more years, potentially causing further disruption to UK-EU relations.

Written for “Miliband Criticizes Blair Over Slavery Statement” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 2 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 128295 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-04

Story

📰 Miliband Criticizes Blair Over Slavery Statement
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 16 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss Andy Burnham's stance on apologizing for British involvement in slavery and his presence at the Commonwealth summit, they describe different aspects of the broader topic without focusing on the same specific incident or time.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses Prime Minister Andy Burnham's statement about considering an apology for Britain's role in the slave trade, while Article B mentions Burnham’s plan but focuses more on the context of a Commonwealth summit and US midterm elections.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Prime Minister Andy Burnham's stance on apologizing for slavery, they describe different aspects and timeframes around this issue.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 3 of 65 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Andy Burnham's political stance and situation, with Article A criticizing his comments about slavery while Article B focuses on a live blog update during a Commonwealth summit.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A focuses on Prime Minister Andy Burnham's stance regarding an apology for slavery, while Article B discusses Ed Miliband's criticism of Blair and support for Burnham's plan in the context of UK politics live updates.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 15 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss related topics and figures but do not describe the same specific incident.”
BBC News
Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Miliband's stance on slavery apologies and do not describe the same specific incident or time.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different timeframes and contexts around Andy Burnham's stance on the slave trade apology, with Article A focusing on initial demands and responses, while Article B covers subsequent criticism and defense of his plan.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes Burnham's own stance on apologizing for slavery, while Article B discusses criticism of Blair and support for Burnham's plan by Miliband during a Commonwealth summit.”
Dawn
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A discusses PM Burnham's stance on an apology for slavery during a Commonwealth summit, while Article B mentions Burnham's attendance at the summit but focuses more on UK-US political dynamics and reactions to his statement.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2944 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Andrew Sparrow
27 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Donald Trump is still president for the next two years, and none of the chaos he has caused for Britain and other European allies is going to go away; conceivably, he could end up even more disruptive.
🔮 - Mahmood appeared to accept that her U-turn could cost billions.
🔮 Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, will this afternoon unveil the final version of her plans to make foreign workers wait longer before they can apply for indefinite leave to remain, and we know relatively little about what she will say.
🔮 The prime minister said he hoped to have all four UK nations moving at the same pace on devolution, particularly on efforts outlined in Wednesday’s budget to give mayors in England more powers over tax revenues.
🔮 Burnham admits he would have liked more radical first budget Andy Burnham has admitted his first budget as prime minister was not as radical as he would have liked because of the economic uncertainty facing the country, Kiran Stacey reports.
🔮 As Rowena Mason reports, one of the top lines was Healey saying he would cut welfare spending before the election.
🔮 He said he asked the chancellor if there would be a support scheme to help people with energy bills from January, when costs are set to rise sharply.
🔮 A week today John Healey, the chancellor, will be doing a media round defending the budget he is presenting on Wednesday next week.
🔮 And if you want to all the technical documents relating to the decision, you will find them here.
🔮 John Healey, the chancellor, is delivering his first budget a week tomorrow, and this morning there are two news developments that will help to frame the way it is received.
Also by Andrew Sparrow
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 27 articles by Andrew Sparrow →

Topics

Antigua BBC Britain Commonwealth European

Subjects

Miliband PERSON · 9× Commonwealth ORG · 4× Blair PERSON · 3× Burnham PERSON · 3× BBC ORG · 2× Britain GPE · 2× Commons ORG · 2× Andy Burnham PERSON · 1× Antigua GPE · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

(Miliband has for many years had a strained relationship with the former prime minister, who was opposed to the way Miliband criticised some aspects of New Labour’s record when he was party leader between 2010 and 2015.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-04
🔮 Donald Trump is still president for the next two years, and none of the chaos he has caused for Britain and other European allies is going to go away; conceivably, he could end up even more disruptive.

Claims (38 extracted, 4 hedged)

Wednesdays are normally the most exciting day of the week at Westminster, because it’s PMQs, but today (unless we get some mega surprise) all the action is taking place somewhere else. asserted
action → ’ → place
In part, that’s because Andy Burnham is still at the Commonwealth summit in Antigua. asserted
Burnham → ’ → Antigua
You can catch up with all the drama on our US politics live blog. asserted
You → catch → blog
While the US results are undoubtedly fascinating, quite how relevant they are to the UK is a bit harder to discern. asserted
are → discern → UK
Donald Trump is still president for the next two years, and none of the chaos he has caused for Britain and other European allies is going to go away; conceivably, he could end up even more disruptive. uncertain
he → cause → Britain
Trump was first elected president in 2016 only months after the UK voted for Brexit and there will be progressives in Britain hoping the US results show that what Ed Davey is this morning calling the “politics of hate, division and economic harm” might be on their way out this side of the pond too. uncertain
calling → elect → pond
But it is probably too soon to get carried away. asserted
it → get → ?
In so far as there is any interesting UK reaction, I will post it here. asserted
I → be → it
Back to the Commonwealth summit, and Ed Miliband, the foreign secretary, has given an interview to the BBC in which he defended Burnham’s decision to open talks about a proper UK apology for slavery. asserted
he → give → slavery
In particular, Miliband was critical of Tony Blair’s attempts to settle this issue with what Miliband described as a “sorry not sorry” apology. asserted
Miliband → settle → apology
Miliband was referring to this statement that Blair issued in 2006, written up at the time by the Guardian here. asserted
Blair → refer → Guardian
Blair said the slave trade was “profoundly shameful” and he expressed “deep sorrow that it ever happened”. asserted
it → say → sorrow
But he did not formally apologise. asserted
he → apologise → ?
In an interview with the BBC’s Newscast podcast, Miliband said Burnham wanted a different approach. asserted
Burnham → say → approach
He said: People have been honestly a bit bruised by the past, what happened in the past, the sense that we just really just wanted to sweep this issue under the carpet and not confront it. asserted
we → say → it
My sense is there’s a bit of a sigh of relief that, OK … at least there’s a sense of we’ve got a shared interest now in moving the Commonwealth on. asserted
we → ’ → Commonwealth
Miliband said Blair “did sort of do a kind of sorry not sorry situation”. asserted
Blair → say → situation
He added: “He kind of expressed ‘sorrow, but’ and then said sorry, and then it was walked back by No 10.” asserted
it → add → No
(Miliband has for many years had a strained relationship with the former prime minister, who was opposed to the way Miliband criticised some aspects of New Labour’s record when he was party leader between 2010 and 2015. asserted
he → have → 2010
Burnham has said he wants a “structured dialogue” with Commonwealth countries about the wording of an apology. asserted
he → say → apology
Asked whether the government might reach the point of a formal apology by the time it hosts the G20 leaders’ summit in Manchester next November, Miliband said: “Broadly speaking, yes.” uncertain
Miliband → ask → Manchester
But he also stressed that the UK was not offering reparations. asserted
UK → stress → reparations
Asked whether the government’s new approach could end up costing UK taxpayers a penny more, Miliband replied: No … uncertain
Miliband → ask → ?
For us, that’s never been what it’s about. asserted
it → ’ → what
And that’s why it’s been important that … I did have this conversation with our partners in advance. asserted
I → ’ → advance
I said, ‘Look, we are going to say we are willing to say that we’re open to an apology, but we’re not going to shift our position on reparations.’ asserted
we → say → reparations
It’s not for us. asserted
It → ’ → us
It’s not the right answer. asserted
It → ’ → ?
It’s not practical. asserted
It → ’ → ?
It’s not feasible for us, but there are things we can work on co-operatively. asserted
we → ’ → us
Yvette Cooper, the health secretary, gives evidence to the Commons health committee. asserted
Cooper → give → committee
Lucy Powell, the education secretary, gives evidence to the Commons education committee. asserted
Powell → give → committee
Louise Haigh, the first secretary of state, faces Alex Burghart, the deputy Conservative leader, at PMQs. asserted
Haigh → face → PMQs
Andy Burnham is due to record a pooled TV interview while attending the final day of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting in Antigua and Barbuda. asserted
Burnham → record → Antigua
Jonathan Haskel, chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility, gives evidence with colleagues to the Commons Treasury committee about the budget. asserted
Haskel → give → budget
I’m afraid we are no longer able to have comments open below the line every day on this blog. asserted
comments → ’m → blog
If you want to contact me, please email politics.live@theguardian.com. asserted
you → want → politics.live@theguardian.com
You can use this email to flag up corrections, comments for publication, questions or complaints. asserted
You → use → questions
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support