Photo via Fox News

DOJ faces ‘heavy lift’ in Alaska election appeal as separate criminal probe continues

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Creitz, C. (2026, November 3). DOJ faces ‘heavy lift’ in Alaska election appeal as separate criminal probe continues. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-faces-heavy-lift-alaska-election-appeal-separate-criminal-probe-continues

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-11-03 · by Charles Creitz

Quick Summary

The Justice Department is facing significant challenges in its attempt to appeal a federal judge’s dismissal of its lawsuit regarding Alaska's Senate election ballot, which includes two candidates named Dan Sullivan. Legal experts advise that even if the DOJ wins the appeal, obtaining an injunction before Tuesday’s voting deadline could be difficult due to procedural hurdles and time constraints. Meanwhile, a separate criminal investigation into allegations related to the recruitment of one of the Sullivans continues independently of the civil case.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On November 2, 2026, a federal judge dismissed the Trump administration’s lawsuit seeking to delay certification of Alaska's Senate race if Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan loses. The Justice Department had filed an amended complaint on October 30, alleging that Democratic operatives recruited a spoiler candidate to siphon votes from Sullivan. However, Alaska’s state government argued that setting aside ballots ranking Sullivan was "not even possible" due to voter privacy laws. The judge agreed, ruling that the federal officials lacked standing because they had not demonstrated how their proposed remedy could address potential voter confusion without compromising ballot secrecy. This decision comes just days before the November 3 midterm election, which will determine control of Congress.

Written for “Judge Tosses Trump DOJ Lawsuit” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 26 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 125378 · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 Judge Tosses Trump DOJ Lawsuit
Politics · 27 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 26% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the issuance of subpoenas by the Justice Department regarding the 'second Dan Sullivan' candidacy in Alaska, while Article B discusses the legal challenges faced by DOJ in appealing a federal judge's dismissal of its lawsuit over the same issue. These are different stages and aspects of the broader event but not the same specific incident.”
The Independent
Hedges 6 of 45 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the investigation and legal proceedings related to Alaska's Senate race, rather than the same specific incident or time.”
New York Post
Hedges 3 of 35 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different stages of the legal proceedings related to the lawsuit, with Article A discussing the initial lawsuit and Article B focusing on the DOJ's appeal after the dismissal.”
Fox News
Hedges 6 of 19 claims Outlet record 69/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the DOJ in separate states (California and Alaska) related to voter rolls and election ballots.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 8 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the DOJ in separate states regarding election cases.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different stages of related legal proceedings involving Dan Sullivan in Alaska, but do not refer to the same specific incident.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 8 of 32 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the DOJ's involvement in the Alaska Senate race, with Article A focusing on new subpoenas and investigations while Article B focuses on a legal appeal following a judge's dismissal.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the Justice Department seeking new subpoenas in a probe related to ballot confusion, while Article B focuses on the legal appeal and separate criminal investigation following Judge Gleason's dismissal of the lawsuit.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different stages of the DOJ's involvement in the Alaska election controversy: one focuses on preserving ballots, while the other discusses the legal challenge to a judge's dismissal of their lawsuit.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
26%
10 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
27
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6392 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Charles Creitz
43 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The judge ruled that federal officials lacked standing because they had not demonstrated how its proposed remedy could address potential voter confusion without compromising ballot secrecy.
🔮 I will always stand with you," Democratic nominee Angie Nixon, a state lawmaker from Jacksonville whose platform is considered DSA-aligned, wrote on X. O’Brien also caught heat for voting in Florida, which appeared to signal a move from his hometown of Boston. "
🔮 Control of Congress is on the line Tuesday as voters decide pivotal Senate and House races across the country, while closely watched contests for governor will shape the political landscape in key states during President Donald Trump's second term.
🔮 Fox News will deliver live results, race calls and around-the-clock coverage as voters decide control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections.
🔮 President Donald Trump' s push to oust Rep. Ilhan Omar amid allegations of immigration fraud could trigger a constitutional fight, with legal experts telling Fox News Digital that a landmark Supreme Court case involving another entrenched Democrat may not stand in Republicans’ way.
🔮 The discovery follows the "Betty No Last Name" controversy in Chesapeake — where a purported convict lacking a surname had "her" rights restored — and raises fresh questions about the governor's vetting process just days before voters decide whether to make felons' voting-rights restoration automatic via an Election Day ballot measure supported by Richmond Democrats. Del. Tom Garrett, R-Buckingham — who received the letter from the constituent who owned the pet — is now calling for an investigation into how Gov. Abigail Spanberger could have restored voting and jury-service rights to a deceased animal. "This is not a question of whether people who have served their sentences deserve a second chance.
🔮 "This would have never happened if we didn't have ranked-choice voting," Dunleavy told Fox News Digital.
🔮 "While some may try to write this off as just how politics works now, ballot-stacking should have no place in our electoral process," Murkowski said.
🔮 "DOJ's election monitors will be engaging in the same routine monitoring we've done for decades."
🔮 "Defendants’ argument that [Constitution] Article II bars Congress from regulating the removal of AUSAs (assistant U.S. attorneys) flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent," Judge Jesse Furman wrote, adding that accepting the administration's argument would "unsettle the very equilibrium established by this nation's constitutional system." A DOJ spokesperson told Fox News Digital the department disagreed with the decision and will appeal it in "due course."
Also by Charles Creitz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 43 articles by Charles Creitz →

Topics

Alaska DOJ Fox News Digital Senate U.S.

Subjects

DOJ ORG · 7× Alaska GPE · 6× Fox News Digital ORG · 3× Obama PERSON · 3× Stimson PERSON · 3× Bush PERSON · 2× Senate ORG · 2× Sullivan PERSON · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× The Justice Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

"But because there were federal violations, eventually the Supreme Court weighed in and stopped it, And at no point in time had the vice president’s (Albert Gore) vote count ever surpassed that of the governor (Bush) and because it was a federal interest, the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped this counting at the state level."
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 The judge ruled that federal officials lacked standing because they had not demonstrated how its proposed remedy could address potential voter confusion without compromising ballot secrecy.

Claims (38 extracted, 10 hedged)

The Justice Department faces an uphill legal battle in its bid to overturn a federal judge's dismissal of its Alaska Senate election lawsuit, according to legal experts who questioned whether the government can secure meaningful relief before voting ends Tuesday — even as a separate criminal investigation continues. uncertain
investigation → face → relief
DOJ filed a notice of appeal after Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Sharon Gleason dismissed its lawsuit Sunday over the presence of two candidates named Dan Sullivan on Alaska's Senate ballot. asserted
Gleason → file → ballot
The judge ruled that federal officials lacked standing because they had not demonstrated how its proposed remedy could address potential voter confusion without compromising ballot secrecy. uncertain
remedy → rule → secrecy
With voting ending Tuesday, attorneys told Fox News Digital that even a successful appeal could leave the government scrambling to obtain an injunction or return to district court, while a defeat would leave the civil case dismissed without necessarily affecting potential criminal charges arising from the alleged recruitment of the second Sullivan. uncertain
defeat → end → Sullivan
"The federal judge dismissed on a procedural issue — standing," election attorney Jason Torchinsky of Virginia-based firm Holtzman Vogel told Fox News Digital. asserted
Torchinsky → dismiss → Digital
"So if the government were to prevail, it would either have to seek injunctive relief from the appeals court in the first instance; a very high bar, or go back down to the district court to seek relief. asserted
it → prevail → relief
" "Given the time available between now and close of polls [Tuesday], this is a heavy lift for the government," Torchinsky added. asserted
Torchinsky → give → government
A reversal would not automatically change Alaska's election results. asserted
reversal → change → results
DOJ would still need to obtain specific judicial relief, potentially requiring further proceedings in district court. asserted
DOJ → need → court
Former federal prosecutor and ex-Pentagon official Cully Stimson similarly said that DOJ will have difficulty securing any immediate relief in its effort to pause the Sullivan-Peltola contest. asserted
DOJ → say → contest
While Gleason was appointed by Obama, Stimson suggested the ruling did not appear partisan and said uncertainty remains because voting had not yet concluded. uncertain
voting → appoint → Obama
"I'm not surprised that the judge did this. asserted
judge → do → this
I don't think it would matter whether an Obama judge or any other judge appointed by any other president," Stimson told Fox News Digital. asserted
Stimson → think → Digital
"Asking for injunctive relief way before anything even happens is a reach," he said, adding Alaska falls under the San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit, which will hear any appeal. asserted
which → ask → appeal
But Stimson suggested DOJ may have a longer-term objective beyond winning an immediate injunction: establishing a legal record that could support further proceedings after the election, once the votes are counted. uncertain
votes → suggest → election
"They may be filing these suits to establish a record and force Alaska and others supporting the status quo to defend what's happening, knowing that there's some level of confusion and they have the legal wheels churning," he said. uncertain
he → file → confusion
"So after the vote is [over], they've started the legal wheels rolling." asserted
wheels → start → ?
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney for North Florida Zack Smith added that if the Ninth Circuit does not hear the case promptly, DOJ could seek emergency review from the U.S. Supreme Court. uncertain
DOJ → add → Court
While the Alaska case is considered unprecedented, according to the experts, the idea of a Supreme Court expedition at election time is not. uncertain
idea → consider → time
On Dec. 9, 2000, one day after the Florida Supreme Court ordered a manual recount of disputed ballots in the Bush v. Gore presidential election dispute involving "hanging chads," then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush’s legal team successfully sought emergency intervention. asserted
team → order → intervention
The court ultimately decided in Bush’s favor within a week. asserted
court → decide → week
Since the disputed 2000 election, which featured "hanging chads" on hole-punched paper ballots and the Brooks Brothers Riot at the Miami-Dade elections office, DOJ has become well-accustomed to the expedited-review process, the experts said. asserted
experts → feature → process
"DOJ is familiar with kind of working quickly, getting things to the Supreme Court, and so I wouldn't be completely surprised if you were to see something like that," Smith said. asserted
Smith → work → that
Bush v. Gore offers a procedural parallel because federal courts were asked to intervene in the administration of a state-run election. asserted
courts → offer → election
"Florida was conducting the election in the manner under Florida law, under this time, place and manners set out by Florida law even though it was a federal election," Stimson said. asserted
Stimson → conduct → law
"They used a particular type of ballot, which had those so-called dangling chads, which were punch-holes that didn't come the whole way off, so the hole was left with a little tag, essentially like a skin tag, and eventually the Supreme Court of Florida ruled. asserted
Court → use → Florida
"But because there were federal violations, eventually the Supreme Court weighed in and stopped it, And at no point in time had the vice president’s (Albert Gore) vote count ever surpassed that of the governor (Bush) and because it was a federal interest, the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped this counting at the state level." asserted
Court → be → level
Alex Charns, an attorney who has argued in federal court, told Fox News Digital that the clock has run out and DOJ's goal of segregating ballots based on voter intent is no longer possible. asserted
goal → argue → intent
"I've litigated against the USDOJ for over thirteen years in federal court. asserted
I → litigate → court
I've practiced law in Durham, NC for 43 years. asserted
I → practice → years
The USDOJ filed a case without legal merit and its appeal is likely to fail," he said. asserted
he → file → merit
"In addition, voting ends [Tuesday]. asserted
voting → end → addition
The relief they seek isn't possible - ballots already case can't be segregated. asserted
ballots → seek → ?
Also, one cannot tell why any voter voted in a particular way. asserted
voter → tell → way
In a statement from the DOJ's "Rapid Response" office, a spokesperson said the court "dismissed the case on procedural grounds but did not dispute the argument of the United States that Daniel J. Sullivan (a/k/a Decoy Dan) entered the race as a frivolous candidate to confuse voters. asserted
Sullivan → say → voters
"Alaskan voters deserve a fair election, not to be misled in an attempt to rig outcomes," DOJ-RR said, announcing their appeal. asserted
RR → deserve → appeal
Stimson cautioned that the outcome of the civil litigation would have little bearing on the separate criminal investigation, which could uncover evidence supporting additional legal action even if DOJ's appeal fails. uncertain
appeal → caution → action
"As long as that criminal investigation is going on, you're not breathing easy," he said, adding that evidence uncovered by federal investigators could potentially provide grounds for a separate civil lawsuit. uncertain
evidence → go → lawsuit
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support