Photo via Dawn

Petitions against detention of Sohail Afridi, others referred to PHC CJ for constitution of larger bench

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Shah, W. A. (2026, November 3). Petitions against detention of Sohail Afridi, others referred to PHC CJ for constitution of larger bench. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2041837/petitions-against-detention-of-sohail-afridi-others-referred-to-phc-cj-for-constitution-of-larger-bench

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-11-03 · by Waseem Ahmad Shah

Quick Summary

A Peshawar High Court bench referred multiple petitions challenging the detention of PTI leaders, including Sohail Afridi, to the chief justice for a larger bench's consideration on Tuesday. Afridi has been missing since the imposition of governor’s rule and emergency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on October 11. The petitions also concern the alleged disappearance of KP Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati and other PTI members, including MNAs Junaid Akbar and Dr Amjid Ali, provincial minister Amjid Ali Khan, MPAs Ikramullah and Aurangzeb Khan, and former Gilgit-Baltistan chief minister Mohammad Khalid Khursheed. The court noted these are not ordinary cases and the petitioners argued that under Article 199 of the Constitution, the PHC has authority to order the production of Afridi and Swati before the court.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A Peshawar High Court bench on Tuesday referred multiple petitions challenging the detention of PTI leaders, including Sohail Afridi — the non-functional Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) chief minister — to the court’s chief justice for a larger bench to be formed. Afridi has been missing since the imposition of governor’s rule and emergency in KP on October 11, when he was taken into preventive custody along with some cabinet members. The PTI claims several other party members, including lawmakers and ministers such as Babar Saleem Swati, Junaid Akbar, Dr Amjid Ali, and others have also been detained or are missing, though their whereabouts remain undisclosed by the government. The court is also considering a KP Assembly immunity law that prevents arrest of assembly members under certain conditions, which stipulates the speaker’s position remains until a successor is elected.

Written for “Petitions Against Detention Of Sohail Afridi” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 125349 · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 Petitions Against Detention Of Sohail Afridi
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
3 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2641 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Waseem Ahmad Shah
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He further argued that the KP Assembly had passed an immunity law under which a member of the assembly could not be arrested in such manner, adding that the assembly’s speaker also could not be arrested under the law. The law stipulated that the speaker would remain in office until a successor is elected, Vazir said.
🔮 It directed that the parties may, by mutual consent, propose an appropriate schedule for visitation, which may include meetings at regular intervals and during school vacations.
🔮 The lawyer also cited Section 27(2) of the act, which provided that the deputy speaker could not be arrested, detained or confined, and that her official residence could not be searched, entered or raided by a law enforcement agency during her term in office.
🔮 Aamir sought directives for the respondents, including the KP IG, the Peshawar capital city police officer (CCPO) and others to immediately take all lawful and effective measures to trace and recover his brother. He also sought that if Afridi was found to be in custody, the PHC direct that he be produced so that the legality of his custody could be examined in accordance with Article 199(1)(b)(i) of the Constitution.
🔮 With Peshawar High Court set to hear today (Tuesday) multiple petitions against imposition of emergency and governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, PTI chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan has sought permission of the court to file an amended petition to challenge the resolutions passed by a joint sitting of the Parliament as well as National Assembly and Senate separately endorsing the said move.
🔮 Petitioner’s lawyers say the process initiated by ECP may result in his disqualification PESHAWAR:
Also by Waseem Ahmad Shah
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Waseem Ahmad Shah →

Topics

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa PESHAWAR PHC PTI Peshawar High Court

Subjects

Afridi PERSON · 5× PHC ORG · 4× PTI ORG · 4× Ali PERSON · 3× Farah Jamshed PERSON · 1× Khyber Pakhtunkhwa GPE · 1× PESHAWAR GPE · 1× Peshawar High Court ORG · 1× Sohail Afridi PERSON · 1× Syed Arshad Ali PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Apart from Afridi’s detention, the petitions also pertain to the alleged disappearance of KP Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati, MNAs Junaid Akbar and Dr Amjid Ali, provincial minister Amjid Ali Khan, MPAs Ikramullah and Aurangzeb Khan, former chief minister of Gilgit-Baltistan Mohammad Khalid Khursheed and several other PTI leaders.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 He further argued that the KP Assembly had passed an immunity law under which a member of the assembly could not be arrested in such manner, adding that the assembly’s speaker also could not be arrested under the law. The law stipulated that the speaker would remain in office until a successor is elected, Vazir said.

Claims (23 extracted, 3 hedged)

A Peshawar High Court (PHC) bench on Tuesday referred multiple petitions challenging the detention of PTI leaders, including Sohail Afridi — the non-functional Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chief minister — to the chief justice for the constitution of a larger bench. asserted
bench → refer → bench
Afridi has not been seen since the imposition of governor’s rule and emergency in KP on Oct 11. asserted
Afridi → see → Oct
His whereabouts remained unknown on the day governor’s rule was imposed, and a federal minister confirmed a day later that he and some of his cabinet members were in preventive custody. asserted
he → remain → custody
The PTI has also alleged the detention and arrests of several of its other members, including lawmakers and ministers. asserted
PTI → allege → lawmakers
Their whereabouts have not been disclosed by the government so far. asserted
whereabouts → disclose → government
Multiple pleas have been filed in the PHC in this connection. asserted
pleas → file → connection
A division bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Farah Jamshed took up the petitions on Tuesday. asserted
bench → comprise → Tuesday
Apart from Afridi’s detention, the petitions also pertain to the alleged disappearance of KP Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati, MNAs Junaid Akbar and Dr Amjid Ali, provincial minister Amjid Ali Khan, MPAs Ikramullah and Aurangzeb Khan, former chief minister of Gilgit-Baltistan Mohammad Khalid Khursheed and several other PTI leaders. asserted
petitions → pertain → Baltistan
Afridi’s brother Mohammad Aamir filed one of the petitions, alleging that Afridi was “abducted” from Chief Minister House on the night that the emergency was imposed in the province. asserted
emergency → file → province
He had approached the PHC on Oct 13. asserted
He → approach → Oct
On Tuesday, the bench referred the pleas to the chief justice after the KP government and senior police officials failed to file their respective replies in accordance with the court’s Oct 20 directives. asserted
government → refer → directives
“These are not ordinary personalities,” remarked Justice Ali during the hearing. asserted
Ali → remark → hearing
Meanwhile, KP Advocate General Sanaullah Khan sought three days to submit the replies, adding that his office was awaiting a response from the provincial home department, police and other law enforcement agencies. asserted
office → seek → department
Bashir Vazir, who appeared on behalf of the petitioners, alleged that the PTI leaders had been missing for many days. asserted
leaders → appear → days
He contended that, under Article 199 of the Constitution, the PHC had authority to order that Afridi and Swati be produced before the court. asserted
Afridi → contend → court
He further argued that the KP Assembly had passed an immunity law under which a member of the assembly could not be arrested in such manner, adding that the assembly’s speaker also could not be arrested under the law. The law stipulated that the speaker would remain in office until a successor is elected, Vazir said. uncertain
Vazir → argue → office
According to the KP advocate general, in more than 200 instances of detentions under the Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance (MPO), orders were passed without the cases being heard. uncertain
cases → accord → MPO
The bench disagreed with the claim, observing that in those cases reports had been sought from the respondents but were never submitted. uncertain
reports → disagree → respondents
It further observed that the detentions under consideration were not MPO cases. asserted
detentions → observe → consideration
“This is an important case; the chief minister of the province is missing,” Justice Ali observed. asserted
Ali → miss → province
The bench said the court had given the respondents 10 days to file replies, but they had not complied with the order. asserted
they → say → order
“We refer this case to the chief justice to constitute a larger bench,” Justice Ali said. asserted
Ali → refer → bench
The KP advocate general also requested the constitution of a larger bench. asserted
general → request → bench
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support