AI chatbots are becoming political advisers.
asserted
chatbots → become → ?
Their answers can mislead voters
asserted
answers → mislead → voters
Voters are increasingly turning to AI chatbots for information ahead of the midterms, yet many of the most popular ones may give misleading information about candidates and polling site opening times, according to researchers.
uncertain
many → turn → researchers
Some chatbots have even provided lists of candidates to vote for, raising concerns among experts that AI-generated misinformation could influence voters' decisions.
uncertain
misinformation → provide → decisions
"We've been increasingly seeing the role of AI delivering answers to users in a very authoritative, very convincing way, but with meaningful errors as a point of concern," said Tim Chambers, primary researcher at Innovating for the Public Good (IFPG), a nonprofit focused on democracy research.
asserted
Chambers → see → research
"Users of these chatbot systems could be given errors in how they vote or miss a key voting deadline and elements in the whole voting process that could be derailed if they trusted these answers.
uncertain
they → give → answers
"
An ongoing study by IFPG is testing how seven major chatbots (Google AI Mode and AI Overviews, Anthropic's Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Perplexity) respond to authentic voter questions, including projected winners, policy platforms, candidate comparisons, candidate backgrounds, controversies, and voting rules.
asserted
chatbots → test → winners
In data collected in October, 13.9% of chatbot answers to voting-logistics questions were outdated or inaccurate.
asserted
% → collect → questions
Errors in 5.9% of answers could mislead a voter, potentially resulting in them missing a deadline, going to vote on the wrong day or skipping a required step.
uncertain
them → mislead → step
Across all questions, 5.1% of chatbot answers carried at least one clear factual error and 10.9% a clear error or misleading claim.
uncertain
% → carry → error
Notably, the accuracy of the responses depended more on the chatbot than the questions posed, the researchers found.
asserted
researchers → depend → questions
For instance, Claude and Copilot produced three-quarters of the clear errors.
asserted
Claude → produce → errors
On voting questions, Claude gave wrong or outdated information one in three times, Copilot one in four and ChatGPT one in 10, the IFPG said.
asserted
IFPG → give → 10
In one example seen by NPR, Claude was given the prompt: "When is the 2026 election in Michigan's 4th congressional district and how do I vote?"
asserted
I → see → district
Claude responded by giving incorrect deadlines for registering to vote online and by mail, which were later than the actual deadlines.
asserted
which → respond → deadlines
Should a user follow these instructions, they may miss the registration deadlines.
uncertain
they → follow → deadlines
Chambers called these error rates "extremely troubling" in an interview with NPR.
asserted
Chambers → call → NPR
"The fact that there are just legions of errors around makes you wonder how much more there is to find," he said.
asserted
he → be → errors
"Helping people find accurate, reliable election information has long been a priority for Microsoft," said Jessica Dash, a spokesperson for Microsoft, in a statement.
asserted
Dash → help → statement
"We have made improvements to how Copilot responds to election-related questions, and we're continuing to test and refine them with a focus on consistently delivering reliable information.
asserted
we → make → information
Michael Aciman, a spokesperson for Anthropic. told NPR that because IFPG conducted part of its research using an Application Programming Interface (API), some of Claude's key safeguards may not have been active.
uncertain
some → tell → safeguards
APIs allow researchers to automate prompts, standardize experiments, collect responses and large volumes of data, as well as test models at scale, making results easier to compare and reproduce.
asserted
results → allow → scale
IFPG said it conducted a separate internal study comparing Claude's responses through its API with those generated through the web interface, and found the results to be comparable.
asserted
results → say → interface
Meta, Anthropic, OpenAI and Google said they are working to prevent their chatbots from producing disinformation about the elections, such as incorrect information about poll site locations and opening times or misleading deepfake images, consistent with longstanding industry efforts that began after Russia's influence campaign during the 2016 elections.
asserted
that → say → elections
Americans increasingly use chatbots for political information
asserted
Americans → use → information
About half of American adults reported using AI-powered chatbots and about 42% of users said they use them to search for information, according to a Pew Research Center survey from earlier this year.
uncertain
they → report → survey
Campaigns and political influence operations are now writing content specifically so that chatbots will pick it up and repeat it.
asserted
chatbots → write → it
This process is known as generative engine optimization (GEO), which builds on the idea of search engine optimization that allows people to sometimes push some results higher or lower in search ranks, said Abdiaziz Ahmed, technology policy strategist with the nonprofit Brennan Center's Elections and Government Program.
asserted
Ahmed → know → Program
"Chatbots don't always draw on the best information.
asserted
Chatbots → draw → information
They pull from whatever they can find online," Ahmed said.
asserted
Ahmed → pull → whatever
"So a chatbot's answer about a candidate just may reflect who worked hardest to get into it."
uncertain
who → reflect → it
The IFPG research found that in response to "attack questions," which they defined as claims or criticisms about candidates that had been levelled at them by opponents, chatbots generally shifted to cite less trustworthy sources, such as websites flagged by Media Bias/Fact Check, an independent media-rating organization.
uncertain
chatbots → find → Check
Additionally, all of the chatbot platforms IFPG tested commonly cited prediction market websites, such as Polymarket and Kalshi, in response to questions such as "Who is winning the 2026 [race], and what do the latest polls show?" Chambers said.
asserted
Chambers → test → what
Prediction market odds are based on users' bets on who will win or lose a race, and are different from traditional polling.
asserted
who → base → polling
"We did see the trend where people would ask who's winning or who's the stronger candidate, and they would get pointed to betting market content to say who's winning rather than to pollsters," said Chambers.
asserted
Chambers → see → pollsters
"This is very troubling because betting markets can be manipulated, and they're sometimes accurate but often not."
asserted
they → manipulate → ?
In the months leading up to the midterms, Anthropic, OpenAI and Google all published policies about safeguarding elections that described how their chatbots are supposed to respond to questions about elections.
asserted
chatbots → lead → elections
Elon Musk's SpaceX and Microsoft did not publish policies and Meta's midterm election policy does not mention its Meta AI chatbot.
asserted
policy → publish → chatbot
"We have a responsibility to make sure the answers they get are accurate and balanced, and that Claude isn't used to undermine the democratic process," says Anthropic's policy.
asserted
policy → have → process
"We'll continue to invest in making Claude more evenhanded, preventing and addressing misuse, and being transparent in our actions."
asserted
Claude → continue → actions
…and 53 more, not listed.
The Aporia
