A federal magistrate judge dismissed charges Monday against two FBI officials accused of lying to Congress about Hunter Biden’s laptop, saying the case “cannot be described as anything other than weaponization” of the Justice Department.
asserted
case → dismiss → Department
The ruling from US Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui followed a two-day probable cause hearing in the case of Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides, formerly of the FBI’s now-defunct Foreign Influence Task Force.
asserted
ruling → follow → Force
Prosecutors say the duo downplayed what they knew about the bureau’s Hunter Biden probes when they sat for interviews with the House Judiciary Committee in 2023, with Benavides telling the committee he’d learned of the particulars on Wikipedia.
asserted
he → say → Wikipedia
The Post broke the Hunter Biden laptop story in October 2020, which 51 former intel officials suggested was Russian disinformation, but an FBI agent confirmed the laptop was Biden’s at his 2024 gun trial.
uncertain
laptop → break → trial
Faruqui had picked the government’s case apart, weighing each of the pair’s 10 alleged lies on its own.
asserted
Faruqui → pick → own
The DOJ only needed one to survive per defendant for a case to move forward.
asserted
case → need → defendant
Meanwhile, defense lawyers had taken turns grilling FBI Special Agent Bryan Witt, the government’s only witness.
asserted
lawyers → take → Witt
Had the case moved forward, it would have been the highest-level prosecution of federal officials to come out of the laptop saga.
asserted
it → move → saga
Floris was seen weeping in the courthouse hallway during a break in Tuesday’s session, and Faruqui opened that day by tossing a superseding complaint prosecutors had filed after midnight.
asserted
prosecutors → see → midnight
Wednesday mostly belonged to Floris’ attorney, Margaret Donovan, who spent the better part of the day depicting her client as an overworked bureaucrat.
asserted
who → belong → bureaucrat
Donovan said Floris supervised “over 200-300 employees,” and “up to 600” after her promotion to acting assistant director.
asserted
Floris → say → director
A few stray messages about Hunter Biden, she suggested, were bound to slip through the cracks.
uncertain
she → suggest → cracks
Witt testified that agents reviewed “hundreds of thousands” of Floris’ internal communications “line by line.”
asserted
agents → testify → line
“How many hours [do you estimate she worked] in a day?
asserted
she → estimate → day
Twelve, 14, 16?” Donovan asked.
asserted
Donovan → ask → ?
She argued it was unfair to “cherry-pick … five or six conversations out of hundreds of thousands.”
asserted
it → argue → thousands
“You didn’t factor in the demands of her position?” Donovan chided.
asserted
Donovan → factor → position
“I didn’t see the relevance, no,” Witt said.
asserted
Witt → see → relevance
Donovan also worked through a list of what she called mitigating circumstances, including that Floris hadn’t been prepped on Hunter Biden specifically before her Judiciary Committee appearance, the events in question had occurred three years prior, and she was made to answer questions at 10 a.m., which the defense lawyer treated as roughly the crack of dawn.
asserted
lawyer → work → dawn
“Whether it started at 10 a.m. or ended whenever … is that relevant?” Witt asked.
asserted
Witt → start → a.m.
Much of Donovan’s cross-examination focused on semantics.
asserted
Much → focus → semantics
Floris told the committee “I did not” when asked whether she’d been involved in the Hunter Biden investigation.
asserted
she → tell → investigation
Donovan’s argument was that answer could be true, depending on the meaning of “involved” and which investigation into the former first son was referenced.
uncertain
investigation → depend → son
Donovan also noted Floris was a counterintelligence official, not a criminal investigator, and that asking about a criminal case run by another division didn’t make her “involved” with it.
asserted
her → note → it
“The reason we charged her is because we know she was involved in the Baltimore investigation,” said Witt, referring to the FBI field office that led the probe of Hunter Biden for tax fraud and gun crimes.
asserted
that → charge → fraud
“She became involved by talking to the criminal division.”
asserted
She → become → division
Benavides’ lawyer, Ron Safer, then made a demonstrative argument to claim the FBI officials could have misspoken, but not lied.
uncertain
officials → make → argument
During redirect, prosecutors had asked Witt whether the Judiciary Committee employed Democratic staff, and Witt said he assumed so but had “no idea.”
asserted
he → ask → idea
Safer pointed out that the government’s own exhibits listed Democratic staffers by title.
asserted
exhibits → point → title
“Basic civics tells us there are members of both parties on every committee,” he said.
asserted
he → tell → committee
“I should’ve said ‘I don’t know,'” Witt said.
asserted
Witt → say → ?
“But you didn’t,” Safer snapped.
asserted
Safer → do → ?
“Should we infer that you knowingly and willingly violated your oath?”
asserted
you → infer → oath
Donovan closed by needling Witt for consulting Steve Castor, the House Judiciary Committee’s Republican counsel, over the relevance of the alleged false statements to the committee, but not Castor’s Democratic counterpart.
asserted
Donovan → close → committee
“No one explained to me the partisanship nature of the committee,” said Witt, who also admitted that FBI Director Kash Patel pressed for “check-ins” on the case “weekly,” calling it the first time in his career top officials had been so involved in a false statements case.
asserted
officials → explain → case
The Aporia
