Photo via New York Post

Progressives stand against progress — AI, data centers, cars, nuclear power, anything that would make our lives better

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Gurri, M. (2026, November 2). Progressives stand against progress — AI, data centers, cars, nuclear power, anything that would make our lives better. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/02/opinion/progressives-stand-against-progress-ai-data-centers-cars-nuclear-power-anything-that-would-make-our-lives-better/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-02 · by Martin Gurri

Quick Summary

The author criticizes progressive politicians like Bernie Sanders and Abigail Spanberger for opposing technological advancements such as artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers, which they argue could improve lives. Sanders introduced legislation to ban advanced AI after inaccurately blaming it for unauthorized bank account access. Meanwhile, Spanberger imposed regulations on Virginia's booming data center industry despite its significant economic contributions, citing environmental concerns and electricity consumption. The article argues that these politicians' opposition to progress is contradictory to their self-proclaimed progressive stance.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Bernie Sanders, the Senator from Vermont, recently introduced legislation to ban artificial superintelligence and temporarily pause advanced AI development, citing concerns about privacy rights. However, his claims that AI had enabled unauthorized bank account hacks were later debunked; these incidents involved users authorizing access rather than breaches by hackers. Despite this, Sanders' stance reflects a broader opposition among some progressives to technological advancements like AI, data centers, and nuclear power, viewing them as threats to privacy and societal norms. This perspective contrasts with the view that such technologies can offer significant benefits and are inevitable globally. The articles suggest that while Sanders's approach might be well-intentioned, it may not effectively address or mitigate the actual risks posed by technological advancements.

Written for “Progressives Oppose Technology Advances” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 123446 (high confidence, 6 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Progressives Oppose Technology Advances
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 4 of 42 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI but do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Left’s AI Problem Different event
The Dispatch
⚖️ Centre further left than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different topics within the broader theme of progressive views on AI; Article A focuses on an assembly at Webster Hall with Mayor Mamdani, while Article B discusses Senator Sanders' incorrect claims and proposed legislation.”
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 9 of 79 claims Outlet record 97/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI in politics and society, rather than a single specific incident.”
Fox News
Hedges 6 of 41 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on artificial intelligence but describe distinct events and concerns.”
TIME
Hedges 3 of 39 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on artificial intelligence but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Semafor
⚖️ Centre further left than this Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns, with Article A focusing on specific cybersecurity incidents and Article B discussing a political stance against AI development.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
70
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
4 of 70 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16140 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Martin Gurri
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But I was left wondering: Did Sanders really think you could stop the global spread of a revolutionary new technology by passing a law?
🔮 If we work things right, AI will soon enable us to request and obtain any number of government services directly, with little in the way of human mediation.
🔮 The tone has been strident, almost panicked, conveying a sense of utmost urgency. Let’s start with Great Britain. Sir Richard Knighton, chief of the defense staff, proclaimed this to be “the most dangerous period that I have known,” adding: “The war in Ukraine shows Putin’s willingness to target neighboring states . . . [which] threatens the whole of NATO, including the UK.” Armed Forces Minister Al Carns, mixing his metaphors, asserted that “the shadow of war is knocking on Europe’s door.” Sir Richard Shirreff, former deputy supreme allied commander of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), warned that without stronger European deterrence, “your sons and grandchildren and daughters are going to be facing a war with Russia.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Why Is War Fever Spreading in Europe?
Also by Martin Gurri
Why Is War Fever Spreading in Europe?
2026-10-05 · The Free Press
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Commonwealth Vermont Virginia

Subjects

Sanders PERSON · 5× Spanberger PERSON · 3× Virginia GPE · 3× Abigail Spanberger PERSON · 1× Bernie Sanders PERSON · 1× Commonwealth ORG · 1× Elizabeth Warren PERSON · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× Sam Bankman-Fried PERSON · 1× Vermont GPE · 1×

Narrative

Here the conserving impulse runs something like this: even though thousands of species, maritime and terrestrial, have vanished and now inhabit our natural history museums, we must freeze the process of extinction so that every stickleback, honeybee, and axolotl hang around until the end of time.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 But I was left wondering: Did Sanders really think you could stop the global spread of a revolutionary new technology by passing a law?

Claims (70 extracted, 4 hedged)

I recently came across a news item that made me reflect on our strange political environment —always a painful experience. asserted
me → come → environment
Bernie Sanders, the ancient socialist senator from Vermont, delivered a tirade against artificial intelligence, claiming that it had provided the tools for unscrupulous hackers to break into unauthorized bank accounts. asserted
hackers → deliver → accounts
Even as he railed about an “evisceration of our privacy rights,” Sanders introduced legislation to “ban artificial superintelligence and temporarily pause advanced AI development.” asserted
Sanders → rail → development
It turned out that Sanders got his facts wrong. asserted
facts → turn → ?
There had been no AI-induced assault on bank accounts, just a new way of accessing these accounts that was authorized by the users but not the banks. asserted
that → induce → users
But I was left wondering: Did Sanders really think you could stop the global spread of a revolutionary new technology by passing a law? uncertain
you → leave → law
And if you could — which you can’t — why on earth would you want to do it? uncertain
you → want → it
Why would a politician who considers himself “progressive” declare war on the future? asserted
himself → consider → future
When one delves into the matter, a pattern emerges. asserted
pattern → delve → matter
Virtually all AI doomers — from politicians like Sanders and fellow senator Elizabeth Warren, through tech barons like Sam Altman, to “effective altruism” practitioners like Sam Bankman-Fried — hail from the left side of the political spectrum. asserted
doomers → hail → spectrum
They are terrified of change. asserted
They → terrify → change
Perceived objectively, without preconceptions, the left turns out to be radically conservative – trying, in case after case, to freeze our restless society in place. asserted
left → perceive → place
A good example is the curious hostility towards data centers — the server farms that stand upstream of the AI platforms. asserted
that → stand → platforms
My state of Virginia is pretty much the galactic headquarters for data centers, with hundreds of installations that have created tens of thousands of jobs and generated billions in revenue for the Commonwealth. asserted
that → create → Commonwealth
Yet Abigail Spanberger, progressive governor of Virginia, early in her tenure signed an executive order dumping a raft of regulations, a more restrictive approval process, and a bureaucratic task force on potential builders of new data centers. asserted
Spanberger → sign → centers
Spanberger evidently views the data centers with suspicion. asserted
Spanberger → view → suspicion
Many of her followers, however, look on them with open hostility and want a “pause” in their construction, very much like Sanders’ freeze on AI development. asserted
Many → look → development
Since Spanberger appears eager to please the progressive base, that may be the dismal end-point for this issue in Virginia. uncertain
that → appear → Virginia
Again, one is compelled to ask: Why would you smother to death a technology in which your state leads the world? asserted
state → compel → world
Spanberger cites environmental concerns and the industry’s “secretiveness,” but the chief charge lodged against data centers is that they consume massive amounts of electricity. asserted
they → cite → electricity
Mostly, this is a pretext — but if it really is the case that the US electric grid is too flabby and under-juiced to support data centers, you should know the reason why. asserted
you → support → reason
Starting in 1957, American electric companies built around 130 nuclear power plants that produced a safe, clean, and sustainable form of energy. asserted
that → start → energy
At their peak, these plants generated 20% of the total electricity in the country. asserted
plants → generate → country
Today, less than half remain online, with just a single plant under construction. asserted
half → remain → construction
What happened? asserted
What → happen → ?
Well, nuclear power was the AI of its day — cutting-edge technology that mortified the innate conservatism of progressive elites. asserted
that → mortify → elites
Regulation, litigation, and propaganda, conducted by progressive individuals like Ralph Nader and advocacy groups like Friends of the Earth, implying dangers ranging from cancer, the “China Syndrome,” and Godzilla, struck a fatal blow to this robust source of electricity. asserted
Regulation → conduct → electricity
Progressives want to pause data centers today because they killed off nuclear power decades ago — a chain of causation that can lead, quite literally, to the dark ages. asserted
that → want → ages
The best illustration of the horror of change and lack of forward-thinking by this sect can be found in their favorite means of transportation: trains and bicycles. asserted
illustration → find → transportation
I mean, these are 19th-century technologies: the first steam-powered locomotive made its appearance in 1804 while the bicycle was invented in 1817. asserted
bicycle → mean → 1817
Nevertheless, progressives spend enormous amounts of taxpayers’ money to promote these comfy old machines. asserted
progressives → spend → machines
The socialist mayor of Paris, France, spent hundreds of millions of euros and destroyed her perfect city to install bike lanes. asserted
mayor → spend → lanes
Now, the French government is broke, French people are rioting and burning stuff in dozens of cities — but by God everyone finally has the opportunity to take their lives in their hands and ride a bike down the streets of Paris. asserted
everyone → riot → Paris
At least the bike lanes were largely completed. asserted
lanes → complete → ?
The state of California has blown $15 billion to build a bullet train between Los Angeles and San Francisco, and in the 18 years since this project began, not a single mile of track has been laid down. asserted
mile → blow → track
This disaster brings us to a wonderfully hypocritical manifestation of progressive conservatism, usually labeled Not In My Back Yard, or NIMBY. asserted
disaster → bring → Yard
Progressives are in the habit of loudly demanding intrusive government mandates, affordable public housing, and mass transit — but not in their backyards. asserted
Progressives → demand → backyards
In those pristine spaces, every brick and every bush must stay as it has always been, forever and ever, amen. asserted
it → stay → spaces
Against the mighty wall of NIMBY, the bullet train project bounced harmlessly off and soon lapsed into a mere funding boondoggle. asserted
project → bounce → boondoggle
A similar change-related neurosis afflicts the progressive attitude towards nature. asserted
neurosis → relate → nature
…and 30 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support