How City Hall’s tax-grabbing greed jacks NYC’s electric bills sky-high

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Girardin, K. (2026, November 1). How City Hall’s tax-grabbing greed jacks NYC’s electric bills sky-high. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/01/opinion/how-city-halls-tax-greed-jacks-nycs-electric-bills-sky-high/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-01 · by Ken Girardin

Quick Summary

The article argues that New York City's high electricity rates are primarily due to excessive taxation by local government on utility companies like Consolidated Edison. According to the author’s analysis, Con Ed’s property tax bill alone was $2.1 billion last year, more than double what it was a decade ago. This financial burden is passed onto customers through higher rates, making NYC's electric delivery costs the highest in the eastern United States. The piece calls out Mayor Zohran Mamdani for potentially resisting efforts to make these tax implications transparent to consumers.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 122050: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 City Hall Tax Increases Electric Bills
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
3 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16017 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ken Girardin
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Under New York’s rate-setting rules, the city can create or increase taxes on electricity at will, with the money needed to cover those costs automatically rolled into Con Ed’s next approved rate hike.
🔮 And Mayor Mamdani doesn’t want you to know that.
🔮 SGO benefits can flow virtually anywhere, even into public schools, because parents decide how their kids can use them. But UFT and NYSUT fear any program that gives parents a choice — by, for instance, awarding scholarships to attend a non-public school, or making it easier to homeschool — because they know many dissatisfied families would take it.
Also by Ken Girardin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Con Ed Con Ed’s NYC New York City United States

Subjects

New York City GPE · 4× Con Ed ORG · 3× Con Edison’s ORG · 2× Con Ed’s ORG · 2× Mamdani PERSON · 2× NYC GPE · 2× Consolidated Edison ORG · 1× Manhattan Institute ORG · 1× New York’s GPE · 1× United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

If the city’s get from the grid had just kept pace with inflation, customers would be paying about $700 million less this year. And while many factors — such as the rising costs of equipment replacement — impact Con Ed’s property-tax bill, the money to pay it comes from the same place: Con Ed customers, who are none the wiser.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 Under New York’s rate-setting rules, the city can create or increase taxes on electricity at will, with the money needed to cover those costs automatically rolled into Con Ed’s next approved rate hike.
2026-11-02 · New York Post
How City Hall’s tax-grabbing greed jacks NYC’s electric bills sky-high · assertive framing

Claims (30 extracted, 3 hedged)

Can New York City pols flip a switch to make living here more affordable? asserted
living → flip → switch
Actually, it turns out, they can. asserted
they → turn → ?
NYC’s electric rates have become the highest of any major city in the eastern United States. asserted
rates → become → States
The reason, as I explained in a new Manhattan Institute report, is that city government has treated its electric utility, Consolidated Edison, like a cash machine for almost a century. asserted
government → explain → century
Under New York’s rate-setting rules, the city can create or increase taxes on electricity at will, with the money needed to cover those costs automatically rolled into Con Ed’s next approved rate hike. asserted
money → set → hike
The cost of electricity supply is set by the marketplace, but delivery costs — where companies hold a local monopoly — are tightly controlled by the state. asserted
companies → set → state
And New York City has exploited that to the max. asserted
City → exploit → max
The scheme starts with Con Edison’s property-tax bill, which totaled $2.1 billion last year on the electric system alone. asserted
which → start → system
If the city’s get from the grid had just kept pace with inflation, customers would be paying about $700 million less this year. And while many factors — such as the rising costs of equipment replacement — impact Con Ed’s property-tax bill, the money to pay it comes from the same place: Con Ed customers, who are none the wiser. asserted
who → keep → place
As The Post reported last month, Con Ed is looking to show customers how much their bill is boosted by city property tax — an idea that Mayor Eric Adams’ administration didn’t love, and which Mayor Zohran Mamdani may actively resist. uncertain
Mamdani → report → which
Since the Great Depression — and ostensibly as a temporary “relief” measure — New York City has taxed its utility companies’ gross receipts. asserted
City → tax → receipts
On top of this, the city charges its usual 4.5% sales tax on electricity delivery, as it does on other services. asserted
it → charge → services
But add that to the burgeoning property tax and the archaic gross-receipts tax, and New York City is levying the equivalent of a 36% tax on electricity delivery to apartments — and 41% to single-family houses. asserted
City → add → houses
To put that in perspective, the combined state-local tax on marijuana is only 23%. asserted
tax → put → marijuana
Should Gotham tax electricity more steeply than weed? asserted
Gotham → tax → weed
A typical apartment-dweller — last year alone — paid $270 in city taxes through his or her electric bill; the owner of a single-family house shelled out over $560. asserted
owner → pay → 560
How did things get this bad? asserted
things → get → ?
Even with its Con Ed cash, the city has been spending money faster than it came in for the last four years. asserted
it → spend → years
The only fix for this regressive arrangement would mean cutting elsewhere. asserted
fix → mean → arrangement
It won’t get easier any time soon. asserted
It → get → ?
Mamdani, despite punting billions of dollars in city pension costs and getting extra cash from Albany, still needs to close a $6 billion gap when he presents his budget early next year. And while the city is the main culprit here, it can’t right the wrong on its own — because it got here by gaming tax rules set by the state. asserted
it → punt → state
The governor and state Legislature need to intervene. asserted
governor → need → ?
They can start by ending the city’s ability to tax the gross receipts of utility companies, and have the state Public Service Commission require every dollar saved to go back to ratepayers. asserted
dollar → start → ratepayers
For Con Edison’s NYC customers, that works out to about $300 million annually. asserted
that → work → million
The property tax is a stickier wicket: The entire property-tax system is overdue for wholesale reform, something Mamdani endorsed as a candidate. asserted
Mamdani → endorse → candidate
Here, lawmakers and the governor must resist the temptation for gimmickry, which is what created the current mess. asserted
what → resist → mess
Instead, they could limit the effective tax rate on utility properties to the rate paid by commercial and industrial parcels — and again, require the savings to be passed to customers. And they could go further and exempt utility equipment from the property-tax system entirely, taxing only their buildings and land. uncertain
they → limit → buildings
Those savings, north of $1 billion, could also go back to customers. uncertain
savings → go → customers
Albany has a financial interest in seeing this situation reformed: State buildings, too, are paying these city-inflated Con Edison rates. asserted
buildings → have → rates
That wouldn’t just put money back in New Yorkers’ pockets; it would keep their city from snagging it in the first place. Ken Girardin is a fellow at Manhattan Institute. asserted
Girardin → put → Institute
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support