New Yorkers are now footing Con Ed’s property tax bill thanks to NYC’s dysfunctional system

Read the original at New York Post ↗
New York Post · collected 2026-10-14 · by Ken Girardin

Quick Summary

New York City's property tax system has led Consolidated Edison (ConEd) to pay significantly higher taxes, with the electric company's property tax bill rising from $1 billion in 2015 to over $2.1 billion last year. This increase is largely due to the city’s practice of shifting its property tax burden onto utility customers, resulting in a delivery charge that includes a substantial portion of these taxes. For an average New Yorker, this hidden tax amounts to approximately $32 per month for single-family homes and around $15 for apartments, making residential electric rates among the highest in major eastern U.S. cities.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Mayor Zohran Mamdani is attempting to prevent Con Edison from revealing details about property taxes hidden in utility bills, which account for 21% of the delivery charge for an average customer and contribute to high electricity costs. The state Public Service Commission recently approved rules allowing Con Ed to break down bill components, but City Hall wants to block this transparency because Mamdani promised affordability improvements during his campaign. New York City's property tax system has allowed mayors and city council members to pass significant tax burdens onto utility customers; for instance, Con Edison’s property-tax bill surged from $1 billion in 2015 to over $2.1 billion last year due partly to the state’s climate law requiring grid upgrades. This practice is unique among major cities and exacerbates consumer electricity costs by up to an additional 8 cents per kilowatt-hour, excluding other taxes, making bills less affordable for New Yorkers.

Written for “Con Ed Property Tax Bill” on 2026-10-14, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 78210: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-14

Story

📰 Con Ed Property Tax Bill
Economy/Business · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 18 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles discuss Mayor Mamdani's attempt to prevent Con Edison from disclosing that a significant portion of customers' utility bills goes towards property taxes, specifically citing around one fifth or 21%.”

Cite this article

Girardin, K. (2026, October 14). New Yorkers are now footing Con Ed’s property tax bill thanks to NYC’s dysfunctional system. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/13/opinion/new-yorkers-are-footing-con-eds-property-tax-bill-thanks-to-nycs-dysfunctional-system/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 9968 article(s) · 30 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 30 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ken Girardin
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And Mayor Mamdani doesn’t want you to know that.
🔮 SGO benefits can flow virtually anywhere, even into public schools, because parents decide how their kids can use them. But UFT and NYSUT fear any program that gives parents a choice — by, for instance, awarding scholarships to attend a non-public school, or making it easier to homeschool — because they know many dissatisfied families would take it.
Also by Ken Girardin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Con Ed Con Edison Con Ed’s New York City PSC

Subjects

Con Edison ORG · 6× Mamdani PERSON · 4× Con Ed ORG · 3× New York City GPE · 3× Con Ed’s ORG · 2× PSC ORG · 2× the City Council ORG · 2× Albany GPE · 1× ConEd ORG · 1× Consolidated Edison ORG · 1×

Narrative

Taken together with the other two taxes that New York City directly adds to electric bills, the sales tax and the gross-receipts tax, city tax alone adds 8 cents per kilowatt-hour — and that’s not including state taxes or the other normal business taxes Con Edison pays.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14
🔮 And Mayor Mamdani doesn’t want you to know that.

Claims (25 extracted, 1 hedged)

Consolidated Edison customers are about to get some shocking news about their electricity service: A huge part of their bill, 21% of the delivery charge for the average customer, is paying ConEd’s property taxes. asserted
part → get → taxes
And Mayor Mamdani doesn’t want you to know that. asserted
you → want → that
The city’s unique and highly dysfunctional property-tax system has for decades allowed mayors and the City Council to shift taxes onto its utility systems, Con Ed being the biggest. asserted
Ed → allow → systems
Con Ed’s property tax bill for its electric system jumped from $1 billion in 2015 to more than $2.1 billion last year, all with Albany’s blessing. asserted
bill → jump → blessing
No other major city comes close to Gotham in cramming such a big property-tax burden into consumers’ utility bills. asserted
city → come → bills
The taxable value of Con Ed’s system has exploded for reasons ranging from rising component costs — the basis for much of the tax calculation — to the state’s 2019 climate law, which required Con Edison to upgrade its grid (driving up its tax liability). asserted
which → explode → liability
What matters is that the city chose, year after year, to keep squeezing more money out of that system knowing full well that ratepayers would end up paying the bill. asserted
ratepayers → matter → bill
$32 per house It’s another tax hike on New Yorkers, hidden in your electricity bill. asserted
It → ’ → bill
Today the property tax alone adds roughly 5.4 cents per kilowatt-hour to customer bills in the five boroughs, a Manhattan Institute analysis found. asserted
analysis → add → boroughs
That’s about $15 per month tacked on to a typical apartment’s electric bill, and more than $32 for a single-family house. asserted
That → ’ → house
It’s a big part of why residential electric rates are higher in New York City than in any other major city in the eastern United States. asserted
rates → ’ → States
That tax is also far bigger than the other, smaller taxes disclosed on Con Edison bills. asserted
tax → disclose → bills
Taken together with the other two taxes that New York City directly adds to electric bills, the sales tax and the gross-receipts tax, city tax alone adds 8 cents per kilowatt-hour — and that’s not including state taxes or the other normal business taxes Con Edison pays. asserted
Edison → take → taxes
The Public Service Commission, the state board that regulates utility rates, for years has been critical of the high property-tax bills Con Edison was being forced to pass along to its customers. asserted
Edison → regulate → customers
But the PSC is powerless to prevent it. asserted
PSC → prevent → it
Earlier this year, though, the seven-member body did the next best thing: It gave Con Edison permission to show its New York City customers just how much of their bill covers city property taxes. asserted
much → do → taxes
By the start of next year, customers will see greater detail on where their “delivery” charge, the biggest part of their bills, is going. asserted
charge → see → bills
‘Misleading’ (Don’t go cheering the PSC as champions of transparency and free speech just yet: This is the same board that won’t allow utilities to itemize the cost of various renewable-energy subsidies and other climate mandates.) asserted
utilities → go → subsidies
When the looming change was publicized earlier this month, a Mamdani spokesman accused Con Ed of “misleading” customers. asserted
spokesman → loom → customers
It’s likely that the mayor’s office will push hard to prevent the transparency measure Con Ed is set to roll out. asserted
Ed → ’ → measure
That’s because Mamdani (and virtually all of his colleagues, Democrats and Republicans alike) signed off on mundane-sounding bills that gave the City Council permission to keep shifting more of the city’s tax burden onto utilities. asserted
that → ’ → utilities
And Mamdani as mayor is spending every penny that this arrangement brings in. asserted
arrangement → spend → that
Con Edison’s electric system — meaning Con Edison electricity customers — paid the equivalent of 6% of the city’s property-tax receipts last year, up from 4.4% a decade ago. asserted
system → mean → %
It should be closer to zero: The city could, if it chose, replace the property tax with a higher sales tax. uncertain
it → choose → tax
But then it couldn’t hide that tax the way officials would like to. asserted
officials → hide → tax
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support