Photo via The Sydney Morning Herald

Big tech’s national security case to gut copyright laws is a bluff, intelligence expert warns

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Harris, R. (2026, November 1). Big tech’s national security case to gut copyright laws is a bluff, intelligence expert warns. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/big-tech-s-national-security-case-to-gut-copyright-laws-is-a-bluff-intelligence-expert-warns-20261101-p618un.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-11-01 · by Rob Harris

Quick Summary

Strategic Analysis Australia released a report by Michael Shoebridge that warns against big tech companies using national security as justification for weakening Australia's copyright laws. The report specifically challenges lobbying efforts from firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, which claim they cannot train their AI models in Australia without such changes. Former intelligence official Shoebridge argues these claims are commercial rather than genuine security concerns and questions the link between access to copyrighted material and enhanced national cybersecurity capabilities.
Written by AI on 2026-11-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Strategic Analysis Australia recently released a report warning that big tech companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are using national security concerns to push for changes in Australian copyright laws. The Albanese government is under pressure from Silicon Valley to relax these protections so AI developers can have easier access to copyrighted material, which they claim is necessary for training advanced AI models. However, the report argues that such concessions could make Australia a haven for cybercriminals and compromise national security. Michael Shoebridge, a former senior intelligence official who authored the report for the Australian Recording Industry Association, asserts that these companies are disguising commercial interests as critical national security needs. Shoebridge specifically notes that access to copyrighted music catalogs like Powderfinger's is not essential for AI's national security applications.

Written for “National Security Case Against Copyright Laws” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 120902 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-01

Story

📰 National Security Case Against Copyright Laws
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 5 of 25 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of national security and artificial intelligence, with one focusing on Canada's strategy to address various threats and the other addressing a defense report warning about big tech's influence on copyright laws in Australia.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 42 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the controversy surrounding AI companies' access to creative content, with Article A focusing on local artist protests in a specific electorate and Article B discussing broader national security concerns.”
Fox News
Hedges 6 of 41 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of national security concerns related to AI and technology, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 4 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the issue related to AI and national security, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
2 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 5731 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Rob Harris
32 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The report, from Strategic Analysis Australia, challenges lobbying by companies including OpenAI and Anthropic, which have warned they will not train their most advanced AI models in Australia unless copyright protections are relaxed.
🔮 Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has refused to guarantee Labor will cut more than it spends in the upcoming budget update, despite warning that mounting pressures are forcing the government to examine every program ahead of a likely interest rate rise.
🔮 “Some commanders were alert to this data and rumours that accompanied it while others were not, which may suggest an abandonment of curiosity,” the report found.
🔮 A damning new report prepared for the Albanese government reveals almost two-thirds of homelessness providers are turning away desperate Australians they would once have helped, with some rejecting as many people as they take in.
🔮 She said many of those who had helped elect Haines were struggling to comprehend how the democratic process they had worked to strengthen could become the target of such violence.
🔮 A delegation of frontline workers and people with lived experience of homelessness, family violence and financial hardship will travel to Canberra during the next parliamentary sitting week to press the case directly with politicians.
🔮 Artificial intelligence could become a new weapon in the fight against Australia’s burgeoning fox population, as technology is developed to identify the invasive predators and deliver poison while sparing native wildlife.
🔮 Jim Chalmers knows the government is under the pump and he says Labor must up its game to battle inflation, the unintended consequences of its May budget and keep voters’ trust through a painful period of interest rate rises.
🔮 The findings will intensify pressure on federal and state governments – the majority of them Labor – to overhaul rural health funding, with the National Rural Health Alliance warning that Medicare’s traditional reliance on payments for individual consultations cannot sustain services in communities with small populations, higher operating costs and further workforce shortages.
🔮 “We can’t tolerate 12 or 18 months of will-he-or-won’t-he.”
2026-10-12 · assertive framing · A grateful son or a relentless self-promoter?
Also by Rob Harris
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 32 articles by Rob Harris →

Topics

Anthropic Australia Australian OpenAI Powderfinger

Subjects

Australia GPE · 5× Australian NORP · 5× Shoebridge PERSON · 4× OpenAI ORG · 3× American NORP · 2× Anthropic ORG · 2× Powderfinger ORG · 2× Albanese NORP · 1× Michael Shoebridge PERSON · 1× Strategic Analysis Australia ORG · 1×

Narrative

The systems would remain proprietary products, leaving Australian defence and intelligence agencies as paying customers rather than owners of the technology. But David Wroe, director of AI security at Good Ancestors – a group which has received philanthropic funds with personal and financial ties to Anthropic – challenged Shoebridge’s argument, warning that Australia risked losing access to the world’s most powerful AI systems unless it helped develop them.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-01
🔮 The report, from Strategic Analysis Australia, challenges lobbying by companies including OpenAI and Anthropic, which have warned they will not train their most advanced AI models in Australia unless copyright protections are relaxed.

Claims (28 extracted, 2 hedged)

Big tech is using national security as a smokescreen to gut Australia’s copyright laws and secure free access to creative works, a new defence report warns, cautioning that concessions to American artificial intelligence giants risk turning the country into an international haven for cybercriminals. asserted
concessions → use → cybercriminals
The report, from Strategic Analysis Australia, challenges lobbying by companies including OpenAI and Anthropic, which have warned they will not train their most advanced AI models in Australia unless copyright protections are relaxed. asserted
protections → challenge → Australia
The Albanese government is facing mounting pressure from Silicon Valley to allow AI developers greater access to copyrighted material to train the large language models behind services such as ChatGPT and Claude, with the technology giants linking major investments in Australian infrastructure to changes in the law. asserted
giants → face → law
Former senior intelligence and defence official Michael Shoebridge, who authored the report commissioned by the Australian Recording Industry Association, argues the companies are dressing up commercial demands as a national security necessity. asserted
companies → author → necessity
“AI for national security does not need Powderfinger’s back catalogue,” Shoebridge said. asserted
Shoebridge → need → catalogue
“Nobody has shown how training an AI model on Australian songs, novels or paintings makes us any better at stopping a cyberattack on the power grid or disrupting a terrorist plot. asserted
us → show → plot
If the companies believe it does, the burden is on them to prove it.” asserted
burden → believe → it
At a parliamentary inquiry in September, Australian Signals Directorate director-general Abigail Bradshaw said training advanced AI models locally would deliver “significant benefits for national security”, describing access to the technology as urgent. asserted
training → say → technology
‘AI for national security does not need Powderfinger’s back catalogue. asserted
AI → need → catalogue
She said countries that recognised the scale of AI-driven disruption and built capability early were more likely to be better placed to shape future technologies and international standards than those that did not. asserted
that → say → those
The Attorney-General’s Department told the same inquiry copyright was the main concern raised by major AI developers. asserted
copyright → tell → developers
OpenAI vice-president Ann O’Leary warned the company could not establish an Australian training centre under existing laws, while Anthropic executive Jeff Bleich said individually licensing content was “technically impossible”. uncertain
licensing → warn → content
The comments have united Australia’s creative sector – musicians, authors and media companies – against any move by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to loosen existing laws. asserted
comments → unite → laws
Shoebridge, a former deputy director of the Australian Signals Directorate and Defence Intelligence Organisation, argues that advanced cybersecurity depends on specialised computer code, encryption and classified intelligence, not copyrighted books, music or art. asserted
cybersecurity → argue → code
“We’re being told AI is essential for national security. asserted
AI → tell → security
AI can break the world’s cybersecurity systems. asserted
AI → break → systems
It can solve the world’s hardest mathematical problems, but the one thing AI can’t work out how to do is how to pay humans for their content,” he said. asserted
he → solve → content
His report argues Australian defence and intelligence agencies can already secure access to advanced AI systems through commercial arrangements, while training American-owned models in local data centres would not give Australia ownership or control of the technology. asserted
training → argue → technology
More seriously, Shoebridge warns that weakening copyright protections could attract Chinese AI developers, organised crime networks and hackers seeking to exploit Australia’s more permissive laws, at a time when other advanced economies are strengthening protections and requiring technology companies to pay creators. uncertain
economies → warn → creators
The report also questions the security credentials of major developers after OpenAI acknowledged its autonomous agents had accessed Australian government websites without authorisation, including systems involving Medicare-related information. asserted
agents → question → information
Shoebridge, who also headed the defence and intelligence division of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, argues Australia’s secure infrastructure, skilled workforce and close intelligence ties with Washington give the government significant leverage in negotiations. asserted
infrastructure → head → negotiations
He warned that training American-owned frontier models in Australian data centres would not deliver sovereign AI capability. asserted
training → warn → capability
The systems would remain proprietary products, leaving Australian defence and intelligence agencies as paying customers rather than owners of the technology. But David Wroe, director of AI security at Good Ancestors – a group which has received philanthropic funds with personal and financial ties to Anthropic – challenged Shoebridge’s argument, warning that Australia risked losing access to the world’s most powerful AI systems unless it helped develop them. asserted
it → remain → them
Wroe said hosting American frontier models would give Australia greater leverage in securing cutting-edge technology, much as its defence cooperation with Washington helped secure advanced US military equipment. asserted
cooperation → say → equipment
“The national security rationale for copyright reform is pretty clear: Australia needs access to the most advanced AI models, and we’ve got a much stronger hand in demanding that access from the Americans if we help build those models by having them trained here. asserted
them → need → models
” He said any compromise should protect and compensate copyright holders while giving technology companies legal certainty, arguing that advanced AI systems required broad datasets to develop the reasoning capabilities essential for complex national security tasks. asserted
systems → say → tasks
“Powerful frontier models need to be initially trained on a wide range of data,” Wroe said. asserted
Wroe → need → data
Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter. asserted
Subscribers → sign → newsletter
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support