Washington, D.C., and Virginia sued the National Park Service and Interior Department on Saturday in a last-minute bid to stop construction on President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot triumphal arch.
asserted
Washington → sue → arch
The Trump Administration has said that construction could begin as early as next week.
uncertain
construction → say → week
The new challenge joins two existing lawsuits against the arch, adding to a series of legal battles testing the limits of Trump’s authority to remake Washington.
asserted
challenge → join → Washington
Calling the project “flagrantly unlawful,” the lawsuit points to the Commemorative Works Act, which requires Congressional authorization for memorials on federal land in Washington and its environs.
asserted
which → call → Washington
The lawsuit also alleges violations of the Administrative Procedure Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the National Historic Preservation Act, arguing that the Administration failed to adequately assess the project’s effects and consult as required.
asserted
Administration → allege → effects
“In their rush to break ground on the Arch, Defendants have made only half-hearted gestures at complying with these requirements,” the lawsuit filed Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones and D.C. Attorney General Brian L. Schwalb, claims.
uncertain
lawsuit → break → Jones
“Perhaps recognizing that the project is legally indefensible, Defendants have made clear that they will attempt to outrun judicial review.”
asserted
attempt → recognize → review
“The Commonwealth has a solemn duty and a profound interest in preserving the dignity of this sacred place,” Jones said in a statement to the Washington Post.
asserted
Jones → have → Post
“We will vigorously litigate to protect its sanctity and honor the legacy of those who made the ultimate sacrifice.”
asserted
who → litigate → sacrifice
The Administration argued in a June 17 filing for Lemmon v. Trump—a separate suit filed in February—that Congress already authorized construction at the site in 1925, when it approved plans for Arlington Memorial Bridge that included two monumental columns.
asserted
that → argue → columns
Those columns were never built.
asserted
columns → build → ?
In Lemmon, three Vietnam War veterans and an architectural historian argue that the arch would “block historically significant reciprocal views between” the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.
asserted
arch → argue → Memorial
The plaintiffs have also argued that the plan requires congressional authorization.
asserted
plan → argue → authorization
The Arlington County Board then filed its own suit Oct. 8 arguing that the construction would disrupt roads important to emergency services and “significantly and detrimentally” affect Arlington National Cemetery.
asserted
construction → file → Cemetery
In response to those suits, and defending the urgency of the project, Trump announced last month that he had agreed, at the Defense Department’s request, to incorporate a military complex into the planned arch, including facilities for drones and snipers.
asserted
he → defend → drones
In sworn declarations filed Oct. 28, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin reiterated the claim that the arch is central to national security.
uncertain
arch → swear → security
“The arch is a generational national defense opportunity to mitigate these evolving threats,” Hegseth wrote in his declaration.
asserted
Hegseth → mitigate → declaration
The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), a federal review panel, is scheduled to consider final approval of the arch’s site and building plans on Nov. 5.
asserted
Commission → schedule → Nov.
The commission includes several Trump appointees, and its chairman has said he plans to support the project, according to the Washington Post.
uncertain
he → include → Post
Interior must also issue its final authorization and publish the required notice.
asserted
Interior → issue → notice
The Administration has told the court that those steps could be completed on Nov. 5, as well, allowing construction to begin that same day.
uncertain
construction → tell → Nov.
The Justice Department told the court on Friday that construction could begin immediately once those steps were complete.
uncertain
steps → tell → Friday
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, however, seemed skeptical of the rush.
asserted
Chutkan → seem → rush
“What’s the harm to the government to wait 3 or 4 months?
asserted
harm → ’ → months
What’s the rush to put this arch up?” the judge asked at the hearing for Lemmon v. Trump on Friday.
asserted
judge → ’ → Friday
Chutkan observed that the issue was complex.
asserted
issue → observe → ?
She said that she would consider the plaintiffs' standing over the weekend and rule expeditiously.
asserted
she → say → weekend
TIME has reached out to the White House about the new lawsuit.
asserted
TIME → reach → lawsuit
What Could These Lawsuits Mean for Trump's Other Renovation Projects?
uncertain
Lawsuits → mean → Projects
The triumphal arch is just one of several projects that Trump has introduced in his second term to remake Washington in his image, including the demolition of the White House East Wing and construction of a White House ballroom, the planned 15-month closure and massive overhaul of the historic East Potomac golf course, and plans to restore and rename the Kennedy Center.
asserted
Trump → introduce → Center
In Friday’s hearing, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Robert Stander cited the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in August allowing ballroom construction to continue while litigation proceeded.
asserted
litigation → cite → August
The majority said the Administration was likely to prevail in arguing that the preservation group had not demonstrated the concrete harm needed to sue.
asserted
group → say → harm
“It’s the same thing,” Stander said.
asserted
Stander → ’ → ?
Chutkan, however, said that the two legal battles remain distinct in nature.
asserted
battles → say → nature
“The ballroom case differs in significant respects,” she said, pointing to traffic and public safety concerns from plaintiffs in the case.
asserted
she → differ → case
Chutkan also raised skepticism around the Administration’s justification of national security and pointed out how when Trump announced the arch, its purpose was initially posited as celebrating the country’s 250th anniversary.
asserted
purpose → raise → anniversary
“This is the first time the government has proffered a national security aspect to this case,” she said.
asserted
she → proffer → case
The arch dispute adds to a broader debate over the Administration’s frequent use of national security to justify its policies.
asserted
dispute → add → policies
Beyond defending the White House ballroom and triumphal arch on national security grounds, the Trump Administration has invoked national security to justify pausing offshore wind development, barring journalists from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House, and exempting oil and gas activities in the Gulf of Mexico from certain Endangered Species Act requirements.
asserted
Administration → defend → requirements
The golf-course litigation raises a related question about congressional authority: Plaintiffs there have also argued that federal law requires Congress’s express authorization to erect structures on federal public grounds in Washington.
asserted
law → raise → Washington
…and 1 more, not listed.
The Aporia
