Photo via The Independent

Judge permanently throws out Trump’s Wall Street Journal defamation lawsuit over Epstein letter story

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Woodward, A. (2026, October 31). Judge permanently throws out Trump’s Wall Street Journal defamation lawsuit over Epstein letter story. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-epstein-wall-street-journal-defamation-lawsuit-b3076941.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-31 · by Alex Woodward

Quick Summary

Federal Judge Darrin P. Gayles has dismissed Donald Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and its journalists, ruling that Trump failed to meet the legal standard for actual malice. The case stemmed from a letter allegedly sent by Trump to Jeffrey Epstein on Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003, which Trump denies writing or having anything to do with. Gayles concluded that Trump's claims were insufficient and barred him permanently from retrying this case.
Written by AI on 2026-11-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 31, 2026, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed with prejudice Donald Trump's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, its parent company Dow Jones & Co., and media mogul Rupert Murdoch for over $1 billion. The lawsuit, filed in Miami federal court last year, accused the defendants of publishing false statements about a sexually suggestive letter allegedly sent by Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on Epstein’s 50th birthday. Judge Gayles ruled that Trump did not prove the defendants acted with actual malice, calling the case "grasping at straws." The dismissal means the lawsuit cannot be refiled, protecting press freedom under the First Amendment.

Written for “Judge Dismisses Trump Suit Over Epstein” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 12 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Judge Dismisses Trump Suit Over Epstein
Politics · 13 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 22% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 64/100
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBC News
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 12 of 111 claims Outlet record 67/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
BBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 68/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 3 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
22%
6 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
13
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3463 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alex Woodward
53 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The letter — allegedly signed by Trump and featuring a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that says “may every day be another wonderful secret” — was first published by the newspaper and then shared with members of Congress by the Epstein estate last year.
🔮 Friday night’s order arrived hours after a federal appeals court in the state blocked the administration’s efforts to sequester 20,000 ballots, which another judge warned would “wreak havoc” on elections in the state.
🔮 A federal appeals court has rejected the Trump administration’s latest attempt to stop counting 20,000 ballots in California, an effort that a panel of appeals court judges said could “jeopardize” midterm elections and disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters.
🔮 Donald Trump’s administration is imminently expected to forcibly remove dozens of Afghans from the U.S. to Afghanistan, marking the first large-scale deportation flight of Afghans back into the hands of the Taliban, aid groups and human rights lawyers warn.
🔮 U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes repeatedly erupted at government attorneys during a heated court hearing on Friday before finding that Justice Department officials “intentionally” timed the abrupt removal of hundreds of trees to evade judicial review — and may have been misleading the court about plans that have long been in the works. “The third highest ranking official at the Department of Justice is telling me, telling a federal court, that he cannot say that when the president posted the ‘course will close on November 15,’ what he meant was, ‘the court will close on November 15’?” Reyes asked.
🔮 The president will instead participate in a series of virtual rallies.
🔮 “It will be utilized as a dual-purpose structure: a major national monument that also incorporates military utility to support Homeland defense.”
🔮 Augustin, who is homeless, later said he wanted to get the attention of law enforcement so he could be arrested and sent back to Haiti.
🔮 After the administration was ordered in a separate case to stop running the ads, the president said he would finance the broadcasts himself, or direct his connected PAC to do so.
🔮 Those fines also don’t include $661 million in restitution owed by the former tech CEO who was convicted of defrauding investors, nor the potentially tens of thousands of dollars that would have likely been owed to the government by the more than 1,500 people charged in connection with the January 6 attack.
Also by Alex Woodward
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 53 articles by Alex Woodward →

Topics

Congress Florida Letter The Wall Street Journal the First Amendment

Subjects

Epstein PERSON · 9× Trump PERSON · 8× Congress ORG · 2× Gayles PERSON · 2× The Wall Street Journal ORG · 2× Darrin P. Gayles PERSON · 1× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Florida GPE · 1× Jeffrey Epstein PERSON · 1× Rupert Murdoch PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The publication of the letter spurred a wave of new reporting about the government’s handling of investigations into Epstein, drawing more scrutiny into the president’s relationship with the wealthy sex offender and his alleged connections to a wider network of powerful figures.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-01
🔮 The letter — allegedly signed by Trump and featuring a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that says “may every day be another wonderful secret” — was first published by the newspaper and then shared with members of Congress by the Epstein estate last year.

Claims (27 extracted, 6 hedged)

A federal judge has thrown out Donald Trump’s second attempt to sue The Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch, and the journalists and publishers who reported on his alleged birthday letter to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which the president claims does not exist. uncertain
president → throw → Epstein
The letter — allegedly signed by Trump and featuring a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that says “may every day be another wonderful secret” — was first published by the newspaper and then shared with members of Congress by the Epstein estate last year. uncertain
day → sign → estate
Trump has repeatedly denied writing the letter and denied that a signature on the document is his. asserted
signature → deny → document
He filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit last summer, claiming that “no authentic letter or drawing exists” and blasted the story as a “false, malicious, defamatory, FAKE NEWS ‘article’ in the useless ‘rag’ that is.” asserted
that → file → rag
On Saturday, the judge overseeing the case dismissed the president’s lawsuit with prejudice, meaning Trump is permanently barred from trying to bring another case against the outlet. asserted
Trump → oversee → outlet
Trump failed to prove “actual malice,” the legal standard for proving defamation, according to Florida Judge Darrin P. Gayles. uncertain
Trump → fail → Gayles
The president’s allegations are “conclusory, vague, sometimes inconsistent with the article, and often irrelevant to whether Defendants knew or should have known that the statements in the article were purportedly false,” the judge wrote. asserted
judge → know → article
The president appears to argue that, despite his denials, the newspaper acted with “actual malice” by publishing anyway, Gayles wrote. asserted
Gayles → appear → malice
“In effect, President Trump argues that once he declared the Letter a ‘fake,’ Defendants should have disregarded everything else they learned in their investigation and not published the story,” the judge added. asserted
judge → argue → story
“But that is not what the actual malice standard requires and runs afoul of the First Amendment,” he said. asserted
he → require → Amendment
“Indeed, were that the law, any time a public figure or his team denies an accusation, journalists would be immediately blocked from publishing negative or contradictory press. asserted
journalists → deny → press
The president has been “grasping at straws” to prove his case, according to the judge. uncertain
president → grasp → judge
His order opens with a passage from the landmark Supreme Court ruling in The New York Times v Sullivan, which established that the First Amendment prohibits public figures from suing for defamation over allegedly false statements unless they can prove actual malice. uncertain
they → open → malice
In an order dismissing Trump’s first shot at suing the newspaper, Gayles wrote that the president came “nowhere close to this standard.” asserted
president → dismiss → standard
“Quite the opposite,” he wrote in April. asserted
he → write → April
Last year, the newspaper published a 50th birthday greeting to Epstein from 2003, which included a message that said “We have certain things in common, Jeffrey” and “A pal is a wonderful thing. asserted
pal → publish → things
Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,” all written inside the outline of a woman’s body uncertain
all → write → body
The publication of the letter spurred a wave of new reporting about the government’s handling of investigations into Epstein, drawing more scrutiny into the president’s relationship with the wealthy sex offender and his alleged connections to a wider network of powerful figures. asserted
publication → spur → figures
Trump later reluctantly signed a measure into law compelling the release of millions of documents stemming from Epstein investigations, and members of Congress have launched parallel committee-led investigations into Epstein, his associates and his finances. asserted
members → sign → Epstein
The president’s name appears dozens of times within the so-called Epstein files. asserted
name → appear → files
Trump has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, and one’s appearance in the Epstein files does not suggest otherwise. asserted
appearance → accuse → files
The president has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein and insists he cut ties with Epstein years before the wealthy pedophile — who died by suicide in a New York City jail cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges — was under investigation. asserted
who → deny → investigation
His lawsuit “does not include a single plausible allegation” that The Wall Street Journal knowingly published false statements about him, lawyers for the defendants wrote in response last year. asserted
lawyers → include → response
The article is “true,” they wrote, and the evidence is publicly available for anyone to see. asserted
anyone → write → ?
In July, the president stood by awkwardly at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner as reporters for The Wall Street Journal won awards for their coverage of the scandal that inspired his lawsuit. asserted
that → stand → lawsuit
The president often shrugged or smiled as their reporting was described, and he shook some of the winners’ hands. asserted
he → shrug → hands
When it was his time to speak, the president joked that it had “not been an easy evening” hearing about their work. asserted
it → speak → work
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support