Photo via The Guardian

Trump boosted half of US coal plants with taxpayer dollars and ‘free passes to pollute’, report says

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Beaumont, H. (2026, October 31). Trump boosted half of US coal plants with taxpayer dollars and ‘free passes to pollute’, report says. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/31/trump-coal-plants-taxpayer-dollars

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-31 · by Hilary Beaumont

Quick Summary

The Environmental Defense Fund reports that during Donald Trump’s presidency, his administration supported almost half of the nation's coal plants through financial aid and regulatory exemptions. Specifically, 90 out of 184 coal plants received support from the government, with $950 million in taxpayer funds given to 24 plants and Clean Air Act pollution limits waived for 70 plants. This intervention is criticized for prolonging operations at economically struggling or environmentally harmful facilities, such as Montana’s Colstrip plant, which was granted an exemption despite concerns over toxic emissions affecting nearby communities.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Trump administration provided support to almost half of the nation's coal plants through "cash handouts, free passes to pollute," and other measures, according to a new analysis by the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). The report found that 90 out of the 184 operating coal plants connected to the grid received this assistance. Specifically, $950 million in taxpayer dollars went to 24 coal plants, while 70 others were granted Clean Air Act exemptions from toxic pollution limits. This support has extended the life of many coal plants and is estimated to cause significant harm by increasing electricity costs and air pollution levels, potentially leading to more than 177 premature deaths per year at some plants due to PM 2.5 particles. The EDF's analysis highlights how these actions benefit coal companies while harming public health and driving up costs for Americans.

Written for “Trump's Support For Coal Plants” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 119637: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Trump's Support For Coal Plants
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
6 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1863 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Hilary Beaumont
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 According to emails obtained by the EDF through Freedom of Information Act requests, companies expressed concern that the standards would cost them too much money.
🔮 1. If Democrats do well, they could gain leverage to oppose Trump’s anti-climate agendaA
🔮 If the supreme court justices side with Boulder or decide that the case is not in their jurisdiction, then it would continue in state court.
Also by Hilary Beaumont
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Americans Colstrip EDF EPA the Environmental Defense Fund

Subjects

Colstrip GPE · 6× EDF ORG · 5× NorthWestern ORG · 4× Trump PERSON · 3× Americans NORP · 2× EPA ORG · 2× Sarang PERSON · 2× the Environmental Defense Fund ORG · 2× Surbhi Sarang PERSON · 1× the Trump administration ORG · 1×

Narrative

A 2018 Rice University study found that the plant is responsible for as many as 177 premature deaths each year from PM 2.5, which are particles small enough to enter the bloodstream through the lungs, causing increased rates of respiratory diseases, heart attacks and strokes.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 According to emails obtained by the EDF through Freedom of Information Act requests, companies expressed concern that the standards would cost them too much money.

Claims (39 extracted, 6 hedged)

It’s a good time to be a coal plant in the US. asserted
It → ’ → US
The Trump administration has given support to almost half of the nation’s coal plants, helping them to continue operating despite economic and regulatory headwinds, according to a new analysis by the Environmental Defense Fund. uncertain
them → give → Fund
The analysis, which looked at the 184 operating coal plants that are connected to the grid, found that 90 received support from the Trump administration through “cash handouts, free passes to pollute, and requirements to stay online past their retirement dates”. asserted
90 → look → dates
The administration provided $950m in taxpayer dollars to 24 coal plants and handed Clean Air Act exemptions from toxic pollution limits to 70 coal plants, according to the EDF analysis. uncertain
administration → provide → analysis
“It’s extending the life of these coal plants,” said Surbhi Sarang, director and senior attorney at the Environmental Defense Fund. asserted
Sarang → extend → Fund
“The administration has leveraged a multitude of tools to prop up coal plants, and ultimately all of that is harming Americans even more by increasing electricity costs, by increasing pollution – it’s like Americans are getting hit twice.” asserted
Americans → leverage → pollution
In 2015, the EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards first took effect, driving down dangerous pollution from power plants by more than 90%. asserted
Standards → take → %
In 2024, the EPA updated the standards to further reduce harmful pollution from coal-fired power plants. asserted
EPA → update → plants
In the early days of the second Trump term, companies were invited to email the administration to request an exemption from the 2024 standards. asserted
companies → invite → standards
According to emails obtained by the EDF through Freedom of Information Act requests, companies expressed concern that the standards would cost them too much money. uncertain
standards → accord → money
The Colstrip plant in Montana has operated for more than 40 years, affecting nearby communities like the Northern Cheyenne reservation by releasing toxic chemicals like mercury, arsenic, lead and nickel. asserted
plant → operate → mercury
“That’s one of the dirtiest coal plants that’s still operating in the nation,” Sarang said. asserted
Sarang → ’ → nation
In 2024, the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for coal-fired power plants was strengthened in several ways. asserted
Standards → fire → ways
For example, the standard for fine particulate matter, or fPM, reduced allowable emissions of nickel, arsenic, lead and other toxic metals from coal plants by two-thirds. asserted
standard → reduce → thirds
According to the EDF, NorthWestern Energy and Talen Energy, which own and operate the Colstrip plant, requested an exemption from the fPM requirement. uncertain
which → accord → requirement
Brian Bird, president and CEO of NorthWestern, wrote an email to the Department of Energy in March 2025 asking for a 15-minute chat about the standards with administrator Lee Zeldin. asserted
Bird → write → Zeldin
In the email, obtained by EDF, he argued that it would cost $500m to comply with the new rule: “It is ludicrous that our customers would have to cover the costs of a $500m investment for such a slight improvement to particulate matter capture,” he wrote. asserted
he → obtain → capture
The Trump administration gave NorthWestern an exemption from complying with the 2024 updated standards, which the administration went on to repeal in February. asserted
administration → give → February
Sarang said the Colstrip plant had not installed modern pollution controls that could reduce emissions. uncertain
that → say → emissions
If it had been required to comply with the 2024 updated standards, it would have had to upgrade its equipment, she said: “It would have had pretty significant impacts on air pollution.” asserted
It → require → pollution
NorthWestern, which became Colstrip’s majority owner earlier this year, describes the coal plant as a “dependable bridge to a cleaner energy future” that supplies reliable energy “until viable, equivalent, carbon-free energy resources are commercially available”. asserted
resources → become → energy
Asked to comment on EDF’s report, NorthWestern said its technology at the Colstrip plant is “state of the art” for removing sulphur dioxide, and is 99.6% efficient in removing filterable particulate emissions. asserted
technology → ask → emissions
The company said if the updated 2024 federal standards had taken effect, it would have required it to become 99.8% efficient by 2028, costing hundreds of millions of dollars. asserted
it → say → dollars
The company said its mercury emission control at the Colstrip plant meets current state and federal requirements. asserted
control → say → requirements
Another coal plant that received a pass from the Trump administration is the WA parish coal plant outside of Houston, Texas. asserted
that → receive → Houston
Community members living nearby have called for it to be shut down due to its planet-heating CO2 emissions and what they say are ‘hazardous’ levels of particulate matter. asserted
they → live → matter
The plant’s owner, NRG, asked the Department of Energy for an exemption for all of its coal-fired facilities including the WA parish plant, arguing that its facilities wouldn’t be able to comply with the new standards and would need to “derate in order to comply”, taking megawatts off the grid in “critical areas”, according to an email obtained by EDF. uncertain
facilities → ask → EDF
NRG wrote that complying with the regulations “with razor thin margins” would risk the affordability and reliability of the grid. asserted
complying → write → grid
A 2018 Rice University study found that the plant is responsible for as many as 177 premature deaths each year from PM 2.5, which are particles small enough to enter the bloodstream through the lungs, causing increased rates of respiratory diseases, heart attacks and strokes. asserted
which → find → diseases
“Our research has shown that WA parish is the deadliest power plant in Texas,” explained Rice professor Daniel Cohan. asserted
Cohan → show → Texas
NRG did not respond to a request to comment. asserted
NRG → respond → request
Cohan said plants across the country were supposed to meet the 2024 updated standards. asserted
plants → say → standards
“Trump is letting them off the hook from the more stringent version of the standard,” he said. asserted
he → let → standard
“It lets them stay open longer,” Cohan explained. asserted
Cohan → let → ?
“Many coal plants in this country are barely on the edge of breaking even, and so any regulations that force them to spend more money to clean up their pollution is likely to cause some of them to choose to retire and be replaced by cheaper and cleaner sources.” asserted
some → break → sources
The administration defended its support for the coal industry in a statement. asserted
administration → defend → statement
“The Democrats’ energy-subtraction policies shuttered American coal plants that provided reliable, affordable power to families and businesses when they needed it most. asserted
they → shutter → it
President Trump promised to revive America’s coal industry, and the Trump Administration has backed and saved more than 100 coal plants this term. asserted
Administration → promise → plants
By championing beautiful, clean coal, President Trump has prevented the retirement of more than 17 gigawatts of power and saved lives during heightened demand periods,” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers wrote in a statement. asserted
Rogers → champion → statement
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support