The Aporia
Business, F. (2026, October 31). McDonald’s dealt legal setback as judge allows lawsuit over McRib’s ‘lack of rib meat’ to proceed. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/31/business/mcdonalds-dealt-legal-setback-as-judge-allows-lawsuit-over-mcribs-lack-of-rib-meat-to-proceed/
Business, Fox. “McDonald’s dealt legal setback as judge allows lawsuit over McRib’s ‘lack of rib meat’ to proceed.” New York Post, 31 Oct. 2026, https://nypost.com/2026/10/31/business/mcdonalds-dealt-legal-setback-as-judge-allows-lawsuit-over-mcribs-lack-of-rib-meat-to-proceed/.
Business, Fox. “McDonald’s dealt legal setback as judge allows lawsuit over McRib’s ‘lack of rib meat’ to proceed.” New York Post, October 31, 2026. https://nypost.com/2026/10/31/business/mcdonalds-dealt-legal-setback-as-judge-allows-lawsuit-over-mcribs-lack-of-rib-meat-to-proceed/.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
A federal judge in Chicago ruled on October 30, 2026, that McDonald's must face a class-action lawsuit over its popular McRib sandwich. The plaintiffs claim that McDonald's intentionally shapes the patty to resemble pork ribs and misleads customers into believing the sandwich contains rib meat, which is more expensive and prized for its rich flavor. Consumer surveys submitted by the plaintiffs found that 72% of respondents expected the McRib to contain rib meat and 67% considered it important or very important to their purchasing decision.
US District Judge April Perry dismissed some claims but allowed others to proceed, citing McDonald’s marketing tactics as potentially misleading. The judge said further proof was needed to substantiate claims that consumers reasonably expect the sandwich to contain rib meat despite McDonald's website describing it only as containing pork. The lawsuit, filed in December 2025, alleges that McDonald’s uses lower-grade pork products including shoulder, heart, tripe or stomach for the McRib, causing customers to overpay for a more expensive menu item.