Photo via The Guardian

Billionaire tax: how a union leader’s ‘crazy’ idea became the defining issue of California’s midterms

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Kerr, D. (2026, October 30). Billionaire tax: how a union leader’s ‘crazy’ idea became the defining issue of California’s midterms. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/oct/30/california-billionaire-tax

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-30 · by Dara Kerr

Quick Summary

A year ago, a billionaire tax proposal in California was just an idea; now it's a contentious ballot measure known as Proposition 40, which would impose a 5% tax on billionaires to fund healthcare programs. Critics, including some Democrats, argue against its one-off nature and limited scope. Tech billionaires have spent over $356 million through Super PACs to oppose the measure, while supporters use social media campaigns and rallies featuring leftwing politicians like Bernie Sanders to promote it.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

California voters will decide in upcoming midterms whether to approve a ballot measure that would impose a tax on billionaires. This initiative, proposed by SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West president Dave Regan, was initially seen as an unconventional response to Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which cut over $1 trillion from Medicaid and other healthcare funding over ten years, potentially leaving more than 3.4 million Californians without coverage when the act goes into effect in January.

The measure has become highly contentious, with Democrats divided on its merits, and it has attracted significant opposition from Silicon Valley interests. The California Medical Association's president Jack Chou argues that the tax would harm the state’s economy and budget while failing to address healthcare funding issues effectively.

Written for “Billionaire Tax Debate California Midterms” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 117606 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-30

Story

📰 Billionaire Tax Debate California Midterms
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of California's billionaire tax proposal, with Article A focusing on prediction markets and voter expectations for Election Day, while Article B traces the origin and political development of the idea.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 5 of 61 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Proposition 40's billionaire tax in California during the midterms, Article A focuses on the current campaign and potential outcomes, whereas Article B discusses the historical context and origin of the idea.”
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 6 of 66 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss the broader context and origins of California's billionaire tax initiative rather than a single specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Centre further right than this Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses current polling on Proposition 40's support while Article B traces the origin and development of the idea behind the billionaire tax over the past year.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
153
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
19 of 153 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1836 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Dara Kerr
9 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 When the bill goes into effect in January, that could mean more than 3.4m Californians will lose their coverage, including millions of children.
🔮 But they didn’t glean further information after the company announced there would be no questions on the matter.
🔮 “The samples will be analyzed to determine if the coyote that was taken is the offending animal.
🔮 Rucci denies the project will have such effects.
🔮 Lyft’s success would not be possible without the drivers Lyft sought to unfairly short-change.”
🔮 Sacks, who believes regulation will erase the US lead in the global AI race, is seen as Trump’s AI whisperer – the adviser with the greatest influence in the White House on the topic.
🔮 Trump signed an executive order in March that would create a nationwide list of verified eligible voters, compelling the US Postal Service (USPS) to work with states to establish lists of mail-in voters before elections.
🔮 When asked how he would describe the conflict, if not a war, the president called it “small potatoes”.
🔮 She could see many neighbors’ mailboxes also outlasted the flames.
Also by Dara Kerr
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 9 articles by Dara Kerr →

Topics

California Californians Democrats Medicaid the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

Subjects

California GPE · 3× Democrats NORP · 3× Regan PERSON · 3× Trump PERSON · 2× Californians NORP · 1× Dave Regan PERSON · 1× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Medicaid ORG · 1× SEIU-UHW ORG · 1× SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West ORG · 1×

Narrative

When asked about No on 40’s campaign strategy, a spokesperson for the campaign instead shared a comment from Jack Chou, the president of the California Medical Association, who said the cause has gained endorsements because the measure “permanently damages our economy and budget while failing to fix our healthcare system, improve care, or lower costs.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
🔮 When the bill goes into effect in January, that could mean more than 3.4m Californians will lose their coverage, including millions of children.

Claims (153 extracted, 19 hedged)

It wasn’t yet one of the most contentious ballot measure fights in state history – pitting Democrats against Democrats, drawing national attention from political heavyweights, and netting hundreds of millions of Silicon Valley dollars to fight it. asserted
It → pit → it
Trump had just signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which dictated a trillion dollars of Medicaid, Affordable Care Act and other healthcare funding be cut over the next decade to offset sweeping tax cuts. asserted
dollars → sign → cuts
When the bill goes into effect in January, that could mean more than 3.4m Californians will lose their coverage, including millions of children. uncertain
Californians → go → children
“That’s why we were willing to do something that lots of people said was crazy,” said Dave Regan, the divisive architect of the billionaire tax and president of the healthcare union SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW). asserted
Regan → ’ → union
“To us, what’s crazy is doing nothing and watching millions of people lose coverage.” asserted
millions → ’ → coverage
Now, with the midterms less than a week away, California voters will decide on whether to pass the ballot measure known as Proposition 40. asserted
voters → decide → Proposition
The proposal would levy a one-time 5% tax on billionaires living in the state as of 1 January 2026, the proceeds of which would fund healthcare programs, along with some education and food assistance. asserted
proceeds → levy → education
The initiative has its critics, even among Democrats, who point at its structure as a one-off tax that would only fund certain healthcare programs. asserted
that → have → programs
The idea of taxing the Golden State’s ultra-wealthy has snowballed into a messy brawl over the last year. asserted
idea → tax → year
Progressive politicians have become bedfellows with tech billionaires, opposition ballot measure campaigns have been mounted, Signal chats leaked, and boatloads of money have been spent. asserted
boatloads → become → money
Tech billionaires have treated the proposal as an existential threat, dumping upwards of $356m into “independent expenditure-only” political action committees (Super Pacs) to stop it. asserted
billionaires → treat → it
In the first two weeks of October, according to the most recent campaign filings, the opposition campaign spent more than $42.8m – surpassing $2.5m per day. uncertain
campaign → accord → day
That money went to an army of consultants, who have been tasked with lobbying politicians, blanketing the airwaves with ads and placing op-eds in Latino newspapers across the state. asserted
who → go → state
“This looks like it’s going to be the most expensive ballot measure ever,” said David McCuan, a political science professor at Sonoma State University. asserted
McCuan → look → University
Meanwhile, the far-less-funded pro-Prop 40 camp has relied on viral social media campaigns from influencers and actors, including the artist Shepard Fairey and actor Mark Ruffalo, and raucous rallies headlined by leftwing politicians. asserted
camp → fund → politicians
During one packed event in San Francisco earlier this month, Vermont’s Bernie Sanders said: “The whole country, and frankly people from around the world, are paying attention to what is happening here.” asserted
what → say → attention
While Prop 40 is just one ballot measure election in one state, it is causing ripple effects nationwide. asserted
it → cause → effects
It comes at a time when affordability is top of mind and the disparity of wealth in the US hasn’t been so stark since the Great Depression. asserted
disparity → come → Depression
McCuan said the billionaires’ big spend was partially due to a fear of contagion to other states. asserted
spend → say → states
Likewise, supporters say they hope the proposed tax is a harbinger for referendums on wealth inequality across the country. asserted
tax → say → country
Regan and his union got started on their endeavor last summer. asserted
Regan → start → endeavor
After Trump signed his bill on 4 July, Regan’s team began making calls. asserted
team → sign → calls
They put together a working group of policy experts, economists, lawyers, researchers and political consultants, who came up with the one-time 5% tax to keep hospitals open and union healthcare workers in their jobs. asserted
who → put → jobs
Regan is known for using the ballot measure process as a political tool to strongarm deals with lawmakers and push causes important to the SEIU-UHW. asserted
Regan → know → UHW
Since 2012, the union has sponsored 48 initiatives. asserted
union → sponsor → initiatives
The strategy with the billionaire tax was to sharpen the focus on inequality. asserted
strategy → sharpen → inequality
“We worked to come up with something that could draw enough support from voters, and that could avoid a catastrophe,” Regan said. uncertain
Regan → work → catastrophe
“We just bore down on that.” asserted
We → bear → that
When their plan became public after the October 2025 filing deadline, the billionaires hatched a working group of their own. asserted
billionaires → become → own
Chris Larsen, a cryptocurrency mogul, hosted a Christmas party in northern California’s swanky Marin county last December, according to Bloomberg. uncertain
Larsen → host → Bloomberg
It was in a treehouse tucked into a grove of towering redwood trees. asserted
It → tuck → trees
The singer Janelle Monáe performed and California governor Gavin Newsom was there, along with Google co-founder Sergey Brin. asserted
Newsom → perform → Brin
Newsom’s relationship with Brin goes back decades to when he was mayor of San Francisco. asserted
he → go → Francisco
The governor, now a presumed presidential candidate, had flown on Google’s jet with Brin, and the two men attended each other’s weddings. asserted
men → presume → weddings
But a lengthy exchange they reportedly had at Larsen’s party was far from collegial. uncertain
they → have → party
Brin confronted Newsom about the proposed billionaire tax, according to people who spoke with Newsom, Bloomberg reported. uncertain
Bloomberg → confront → Newsom
The Google co-founder, currently worth about $245bn, told the governor it was forcing him to leave California. asserted
it → tell → California
Newsom and Brin did not respond to the Guardian’s detailed list of questions. asserted
Newsom → respond → questions
By that point, more than a dozen tech executives and prominent Silicon Valley venture capitalists had reportedly already joined an encrypted Signal group chat expressly dedicated to burying the billionaire tax, the San Francisco Standard reported. uncertain
Standard → join → tax
Brin and Larsen were members, along with venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, PayPal co-founder Max Levchin, Stripe chief executive Patrick Collison and investor Ron Conway, according to people who saw the chats. uncertain
who → accord → chats
…and 113 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support