Photo via National Post

Randall Denley: Ontario can’t afford to keep helping pay for everyone’s hydro bill

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Denley, R. (2026, October 30). Randall Denley: Ontario can’t afford to keep helping pay for everyone’s hydro bill. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/ontario-cant-afford-to-keep-helping-pay-for-everyones-hydro-bill

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

National Post · collected 2026-10-30 · by Randall Denley analysis

Quick Summary

Randall Denley critiques Ontario’s financial strategy in dealing with high hydro bills. Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy announced a fall fiscal update projecting higher deficits for this year and next, pushing back the expected budget balance date. Despite this, the government has only taken minor steps towards rationalizing power bill subsidies, which cost $6.9 billion last year. Denley argues that current subsidy strategies are politically expedient but financially unsustainable, as they mask real costs by borrowing money to subsidize residents' bills.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Ontario Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy is set to table a fall economic statement on Thursday, predicting a significant increase in the province's deficit. The current fiscal year's deficit is now expected to be $16.9 billion, up from the previously projected $13.8 billion due to U.S. tariffs and higher oil prices. These factors have also led to a halving of Ontario’s anticipated economic growth, further straining the province's finances. Despite this, Bethlenfalvy has promised a "focused, disciplined, and responsible approach" to managing the deficit but acknowledges that deficits are necessary in the current economic environment. The surge in red ink is expected to continue, with next year’s projected deficit potentially reaching $12.7 billion.

Written for “Ontario Deficit Soars Due to Tariffs” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 6 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 116948: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-30

Story

📰 Ontario Deficit Soars Due to Tariffs
Economy/Business · 7 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Global News
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 63/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
CBC News
Hedges 0 of 28 claims Outlet record 74/100
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 1 of 20 claims Outlet record 52/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 33 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss a fiscal update in Ontario and mention Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy, they describe different aspects or updates at potentially different times.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 37 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
7
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 1233 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Randall Denley
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 First, the deficit will be higher than what was projected just months before, and second, the date when the budget will be balanced will be pushed back, again.
🔮 Top candidates in major cities say they will minimize increases.
🔮 That leaves thousands of students unsure about how they will pay for their education.
🔮 Years ago, Peter Bethlenfalvy said there would be a surplus in 2024–25, but he has now pushed that target back three times.
🔮 Ford might want to look a little more carefully at the Pearson proposal.
Also by Randall Denley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Bethlenfalvy Energy Finance Ford Ontarians

Subjects

Ford ORG · 5× Ontario GPE · 2× Bethlenfalvy ORG · 1× Doug Ford PERSON · 1× Energy ORG · 1× Finance ORG · 1× Ipsos ORG · 1× Ontarians NORP · 1× Peter Bethlenfalvy PERSON · 1× Stephen Lecce PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Given the government’s deteriorating financial position, one would have hoped to see some rational action on its ridiculously expensive power-bill subsidies, which cost $6.9 billion last year.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
🔮 First, the deficit will be higher than what was projected just months before, and second, the date when the budget will be balanced will be pushed back, again.

Claims (37 extracted, 2 hedged)

There are two things you can count on when Premier Doug Ford’s government updates Ontarians on the state of the province’s finances. asserted
government → be → finances
First, the deficit will be higher than what was projected just months before, and second, the date when the budget will be balanced will be pushed back, again. asserted
budget → project → ?
Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy delivered exactly as expected in his fall fiscal update Thursday. asserted
Bethlenfalvy → deliver → update
He says the deficit will be up this year and next, and the elusive budget balance will be delayed. asserted
balance → say → ?
Given the government’s deteriorating financial position, one would have hoped to see some rational action on its ridiculously expensive power-bill subsidies, which cost $6.9 billion last year. asserted
which → give → billion
Instead, baby steps were taken. asserted
steps → take → ?
Bethlenfalvy announced Thursday that the government would cap its biggest single subsidy, the Ontario Energy Rebate (OER), at 1,200 kilowatt-hours monthly for residential users. asserted
government → announce → users
Given that the average residential consumer uses 700 kilowatt-hours per month, that’s a modest step indeed. asserted
that → give → month
The change at least limits the size of the energy rebate for those who have the biggest houses and use the most power. asserted
who → limit → power
Since the energy rebate is paid as a percentage of the bill, people who consume a lot of power get more help every month than those who conserve. asserted
who → pay → those
That doesn’t make sense. asserted
That → make → sense
The Ford government has also quietly made one additional change to the power-bill subsidy that might be beneficial if it proves to be the start of a trend. uncertain
it → make → trend
A year ago, the Ford government sharply increased the power subsidy rate, boosting it from 13.1 per cent because power rates had just jumped 29 per cent due to higher nuclear costs. asserted
rates → increase → costs
Rather than trying to sell that challenge to the public, the government doubled up on the subsidy. asserted
government → try → subsidy
This year, the provincial government got a break. asserted
government → get → break
Power rates over the next 12 months are expected to be lower. asserted
rates → expect → months
It’s a temporary downturn in prices, but the government took advantage of the moment to cut the OER, keeping consumer bills stable. asserted
government → ’ → bills
The question is, what happens next? asserted
what → happen → ?
So far, the government has no apparent strategy on power-rate subsidies, other than to take the most politically expedient course in the short term. asserted
government → have → term
Energy Minister Stephen Lecce said during a discussion of his department’s estimates earlier this year that he wants to “bell-curve” the subsidy, but it’s not a battle he has won yet. asserted
he → say → subsidy
The subsidies are nothing more than an ill-conceived effort to shield consumers from the real cost of power by using tax dollars to subsidize their bills. asserted
subsidies → conceive → bills
In effect, the government is “saving” people money by taking less money from one pocket and more from the other. asserted
government → save → other
With its long string of deficits, the Ford government is, in effect, borrowing money so people don’t have to pay their real power bills. asserted
people → borrow → bills
For the government, the cost of its various subsidy programs is huge and rising steadily as real power prices increase. asserted
prices → rise → programs
In 2020, total subsidies amounted to $4.2 billion. asserted
subsidies → amount → billion
That’s unsustainable now and, as power prices continue to rise with the introduction of expensive new nuclear generation, it’s going to get worse. asserted
it → ’ → generation
If it were to cut subsidies, the Ford government would be accused of increasing power bills, even though all it would do is make people pay the actual cost of their bill. asserted
people → cut → bill
That doesn’t seem like too much to ask. asserted
That → seem → much
Power-bill subsidies might seem odd, but they have a long history in Ontario. uncertain
they → seem → Ontario
Going into the 2018 election, the cost of electricity was a hot issue, with an Ipsos poll showing 61 per cent saying it would affect their vote. asserted
it → go → vote
Despite bringing in power-bill subsidies in 2017, then premier Kathleen Wynne and her Liberal government were on the hot seat. asserted
Wynne → bring → seat
Ford and the PCs saw an opportunity and promised to reduce power bills by 12 per cent, the sort of non-round figure that makes it sound like a real plan. asserted
it → see → plan
Once in power, the PCs found cutting power bills wasn’t so easy. asserted
cutting → find → bills
They did try, pulling the plug on the Liberals’ green energy approach and cancelling more than 700 renewable energy contracts. asserted
They → try → contracts
Bills still edged up. asserted
Bills → edge → ?
By 2019, the PCs decided that borrowing money to subsidize power bills wasn’t such a terrible idea after all and brought in the OER. asserted
borrowing → decide → OER
It’s a worse one now. asserted
It → ’ → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support