Photo via New York Post

Abdul El-Sayed can’t dodge vile antisemitic ad — because it parrots his own words

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Mandel, S. (2026, October 29). Abdul El-Sayed can’t dodge vile antisemitic ad — because it parrots his own words. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/29/opinion/abdul-el-sayed-cant-dodge-antisemitic-ad-it-parrots-his-own-words/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-29 · by Seth Mandel

Quick Summary

An article discusses an antisemitic political advertisement supporting Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed in his race against Republican Mike Rogers. The ad falsely portrays Americans as unable to afford basic necessities due to financial support for Israel, echoing statements made by El-Sayed himself where he links high living costs to Israeli policies and military spending. Despite not denouncing the ad, critics argue that El-Sayed’s rhetoric has influenced its content, making him complicit in spreading antisemitic messaging.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 29, 2026, a controversial pro-Abdul El-Sayed campaign ad has sparked widespread criticism, with critics alleging antisemitism due to its claim linking US aid to Israel with rising grocery prices in Michigan. The ad shows a couple at a grocery store complaining about the high cost of eggs and bananas, attributing these price hikes to $4 billion annually plus an additional $26 billion in US military aid to Israel, costing each American citizen around $161 per year. This narrative is based on statements made by El-Sayed himself earlier in the campaign where he blamed high gas prices and grocery costs on "a war we should not be fighting" at the behest of the Israeli government. Despite criticism from organizations like the Anti-Defamation League, El-Sayed has not explicitly condemned the ad, leading to accusations that he supports or ignores antisemitic rhetoric in his campaign strategy.

Written for “Antisemitic Ads Against Abdul El-Sayed” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but all 3 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 115683: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Antisemitic Ads Against Abdul El-Sayed
Politics · 3 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 12 of 86 claims
“The articles discuss different attack ads aimed at El-Sayed, with Article A focusing on an anti-Muslim ad and Article B on an antisemitic ad.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 96/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Abdul El-Sayed's campaign, with Article A focusing on his stance regarding religious attacks in the Senate race and Article B focusing on an antisemitic ad that quotes El-Sayed.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 63 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the political climate surrounding Abdul El-Sayed's Senate race, but do not report on a single specific incident occurring at the same time and place.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different incidents: one focuses on an antisemitic ad and El-Sayed's related quotes, while the other is about Nancy Pelosi rebuking El-Sayed’s views on Jews and Israel.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 30 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Abdul El-Sayed's campaign and related controversies, with Article A focusing on a payment to a strategist with a questionable past, while Article B focuses on an antisemitic ad that quotes El-Sayed.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 30 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the campaign around Abdul El-Sayed, one urging Jewish support and condemning antisemitism from Trump, while the other focuses on an ad that critics say is antisemitic despite using El-Sayed's own words.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 47 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Abdul El-Sayed's campaign and the political reactions to it, rather than describing the exact same incident.”
NBC News
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss Abdul El-Sayed's campaign and an antisemitic ad, they describe different moments in time: Article A focuses on the content of the ad and its relation to El-Sayed's words, while Article B reports on a clash between El-Sayed and Haley Stevens ahead of a planned rally.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 25 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the content and reception of a new ad, while Article B discusses the origin of the claims made in that ad, tracing them back to El-Sayed's own words.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
41
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 41 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15525 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Seth Mandel
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Might as well put the bananas back,” the woman grumbles.
Also by Seth Mandel
Anti-Zionism: An Anti-Jewish History
2026-09-29 · The Dispatch
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Americans Democratic Israel Michigan Senate

Subjects

El-Sayed PERSON · 10× Israel GPE · 7× American NORP · 4× Abdul El-Sayed PERSON · 3× Michigan GPE · 3× Americans NORP · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× Jewish NORP · 2× Palestinians NORP · 2× Senate ORG · 2×

Narrative

Does it require an astonishing level of innumeracy and economic ignorance to believe that when the US gives Israel vouchers to buy weapons from American manufacturers — thus expanding American jobs and American manufacturing — it’s somehow taking eggs and bananas out of the mouths of theoretical Abdul El-Sayed voters?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 “Might as well put the bananas back,” the woman grumbles.

Claims (41 extracted, 1 hedged)

“We’re paying $5 gas. asserted
We → pay → gas
We’re paying more for groceries because of a war we should not be fighting, at the behest of whom? asserted
we → pay → whom
That’s a quote from Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee for Senate in a tight Michigan race against Republican Mike Rogers. asserted
That → ’ → Rogers
Compare that quote to the ad made in support of El-Sayed that everyone agrees is overtly antisemitic. asserted
everyone → compare → Sayed
El-Sayed won’t denounce the ad, but his defenders insist he can’t be blamed for it. asserted
he → denounce → it
I provide the quote above to make absolutely clear that the spot everyone agrees is antisemitic is drawn from Abdul El-Sayed’s explicit statements. asserted
everyone → provide → statements
The ad depicts a couple in a grocery store doing their food shopping. asserted
ad → depict → shopping
The wife tells her partner he has to put the eggs back because they can’t afford them. asserted
they → tell → them
“We have to set that seven dollars aside for killing Palestinians,” she says. asserted
she → have → Palestinians
The husband whines about the money they already give Israel; the wife complains that each individual American must now fork over another $161 to the Jewish state to “drop bombs on Gaza.” asserted
American → whine → Gaza
The couple then moan that Americans are also paying for Israeli universal health care. asserted
Americans → moan → care
“Might as well put the bananas back,” the woman grumbles. uncertain
woman → put → bananas
But the lies are almost beside the point of an ad that would make the Nazis blush. asserted
Nazis → make → ad
The real point is to plant the idea that Americans are going hungry because of the Jews. asserted
Americans → plant → Jews
The video isn’t new — what’s new is the addition of the names of the Michigan Senate contenders. asserted
’s → ’ → contenders
The ad is put out by a group run by left-wing propagandist Cenk Uyghur (who happens to be the uncle of Hasan Piker, another antisemitic El-Sayed proxy). asserted
who → put → Piker
But the idea undergirding the ad is El-Sayed’s. asserted
Sayed → undergird → ad
So let’s just be clear: If the ad is indefensible, so is he. asserted
he → let → ?
Here’s another example. asserted
example → ’ → ?
In August, the writer Anand Giridharadas interviewed El-Sayed and asked the Michigan Democrat about his obsession with connecting Israel to local issues. asserted
writer → interview → issues
Here’s how El-Sayed responded: “Israel is an affordability issue. asserted
Israel → ’ → ?
Every time you want to put glasses on kids’ faces or give people health care or fix a school, somebody pops up and is like, Well, how are you going to pay for that? asserted
you → want → that
“I don’t know. asserted
I → know → ?
Maybe we should keep our money here instead of sending it there to drop bombs on people’s schools or their hospitals. asserted
we → keep → schools
“That’s our money. asserted
That → ’ → ?
You just saw $3.3 billion voted to send abroad to a foreign government that, by the way, has guaranteed health care and can guarantee college education without debt. asserted
that → see → debt
“And you want to send my money over there? asserted
you → want → money
That’s insane.” asserted
That → ’ → ?
El-Sayed says Michiganders can’t afford basic services because that money is being spent by Israel “to drop bombs.” asserted
money → say → bombs
Israel, he complains — just like the complaining couple in the Jew-baiting ad — “has guaranteed health care.” asserted
he → complain → care
It’s therefore “insane,” El-Sayed says, that “you want to send my money over there.” asserted
you → ’ → money
El-Sayed has been saying some form of this all through the campaign. asserted
Sayed → say → campaign
It’s basically his only idea. asserted
It → ’ → ?
Every bumper-sticker line you hear from El-Sayed is a version of this grocery ad. asserted
you → hear → ad
He’s not the only Democrat angrily spitting this propaganda, of course. asserted
He → ’ → course
Darializa Avila Chevalier, a New York Democratic House nominee, blamed the Jewish state for gentrification. asserted
Chevalier → blame → gentrification
New York Assembly candidate Lydia Green said, “The more we’re spending on genocide and displacement of Palestinians, the less we’re spending on housing, feeding and caring for New Yorkers.” asserted
we → say → Yorkers
Does it require an astonishing level of innumeracy and economic ignorance to believe that when the US gives Israel vouchers to buy weapons from American manufacturers — thus expanding American jobs and American manufacturing — it’s somehow taking eggs and bananas out of the mouths of theoretical Abdul El-Sayed voters? asserted
it → require → voters
Yes, it does. asserted
it → do → ?
That’s why no one believes it. asserted
one → ’ → it
…and 1 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support