JONATHAN TURLEY: Supreme Court must take Herridge case and protect reporters' sources

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Turley, J. (2026, October 28). JONATHAN TURLEY: Supreme Court must take Herridge case and protect reporters' sources. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jonathan-turley-supreme-court-must-take-herridge-case-protect-reporters-sources

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-28 · by Jonathan Turley analysis

Quick Summary

Jonathan Turley, a legal analyst, argues that the Supreme Court should take Catherine Herridge's case to protect journalists' rights to keep their sources confidential. Herridge faces daily fines for refusing to disclose her sources regarding an investigative report on Yanping Chen, who is accused of having ties to the Chinese military and operating a U.S. military training program posing national security risks. The article emphasizes that Herridge’s refusal to reveal her sources stems from protecting whistleblowers and maintaining journalistic integrity, while highlighting potential threats to press freedom if such demands are upheld.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Catherine Herridge, a former Fox News investigative reporter, has been facing daily fines of $800 since 2017 when she refused to disclose her confidential sources for a national security story. These funds were to be paid from the college savings of her two children until a court recently rescinded them. However, if the Supreme Court does not take up Herridge’s case and reverse lower court rulings, the fines could resume. The case involves Yanping Chen, who led the University of Management and Technology (UMT) in Northern Virginia. According to whistleblowers like Stephen Rhoads, a former UMT employee, Chen admitted to being a Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) colonel and instructed others to lie about her past when testifying before federal grand juries. The Department of Justice is concerned that UMT may have been used to gather sensitive information from U.S. military personnel.

Written for “Supreme Court And Reporters' Sources” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 111613 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 Supreme Court And Reporters' Sources
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
61
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
7 of 61 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 5726 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jonathan Turley
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A court later rescinded the fines, but they will be reimposed unless the Supreme Court takes Herridge’s case and reverses the lower courts.
🔮 Those words from MS NOW's Chris Hayes say all you need to know (and likely all you will get) from his interview on Wednesday with Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
🔮 Brown appears to be eager to jump on the same rage train and pledged that he will vote against any Republican judicial nominee regardless of their qualifications or background.
🔮 May you never feel welcome here again."
🔮 As I have previously discussed, the case involving the liability of energy companies for nuisance actions tied to climate change could have sweeping implications for the country.
🔮 Conversely, he saw government controls and subsidies as forms of control and potentially forms of suppression of the human will.
🔮 Some cases will break along a 6-3 ideological divide, but many more will be decided by unanimity or mixed majorities, as in past years.
🔮 Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner has long been to the law what Philly fans are to football: they are simply willing to do things that others will not do.
🔮 The other thing we know is that he will likely get away with spreading fake polling results.
🔮 In his interview this week with Fox News’ Jesse Watters, the Michigan Democratic Senate candidate not only reaffirmed his call for a wealth tax but suggested that wealthy people really do not have much use for money that would be better left to the public.
Also by Jonathan Turley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Jonathan Turley →

Topics

China Fox News PLA UMT the Privacy Act

Subjects

Herridge PERSON · 11× Chen PERSON · 9× UMT ORG · 7× PLA ORG · 6× China GPE · 2× Fox News ORG · 2× Catherine Herridge PERSON · 1× Yanping Chen PERSON · 1× the Chinese People's Liberation Army ORG · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

For example, Stephen Rhoads, a whistleblower and former UMT employee, was an FBI informant in the case and said publicly that Chen had admitted to him that she had been a PLA colonel and told him to lie about that fact when he was called to testify before a federal grand jury.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 A court later rescinded the fines, but they will be reimposed unless the Supreme Court takes Herridge’s case and reverses the lower courts.

Claims (61 extracted, 7 hedged)

Not long ago, former Fox News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge began a painful daily ritual. asserted
Herridge → begin → ritual
With her oldest son for support, she walked to the mailbox at the end of her street and dropped an envelope into the mail. asserted
she → walk → mail
It contained a check for a daily fine of $800 that she was ordered to pay to coerce her into revealing her confidential sources in a national security story that aired on Fox News in 2017. asserted
that → contain → 2017
The money came from the college funds of her two children. asserted
money → come → children
As Herridge drained the savings of her military family, an alleged former colonel in the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) was demanding that a court increase the daily fine to $5,000. asserted
court → drain → 5,000
A court later rescinded the fines, but they will be reimposed unless the Supreme Court takes Herridge’s case and reverses the lower courts. asserted
Court → rescind → courts
Yanping Chen led a school called the University of Management and Technology (UMT) in Northern Virginia, which catered to U.S. service members. asserted
which → lead → members
According to investigators and experts, Chen’s past in the Chinese military suggested that UMT posed a national security danger, including by potentially gathering information on military personnel participating in its programs. uncertain
UMT → accord → programs
The Department of Justice declined to prosecute Chen. asserted
Department → decline → Chen
Nevertheless, after Herridge's investigative report, the government terminated its contracts with UMT because it considered the school a national security risk. asserted
school → terminate → UMT
In her investigation, Herridge published details that directly contradicted Chen, who denied being a colonel in the PLA. asserted
who → publish → PLA
Herridge showed photos in her report of Chen in her PLA uniform, and a whistleblower said on camera that UMT collected information on the military training of its students and it was all remotely accessible from China on UMT’s computers. asserted
it → show → computers
All of that would seem to be the makings of a Pulitzer, not a court sanction. asserted
All → seem → Pulitzer
It is not uncommon for journalists to be sued by aggrieved subjects of their stories for defamation or other civil claims. uncertain
journalists → sue → defamation
Those cases are routinely rejected given the protections for the press under First Amendment cases like New York Times v. Sullivan, requiring a higher burden of proof from public figures suing the media. asserted
cases → reject → media
However, Chen did not sue for defamation. asserted
Chen → sue → defamation
She did not even name Herridge as a party. asserted
She → name → party
After all, Herridge is not being accused of writing anything false. asserted
Herridge → accuse → anything
Instead, Chen latched onto a clever tactic. asserted
Chen → latch → tactic
The alleged PLA colonel sued under a law that does not exist in China: the Privacy Act. asserted
that → sue → China
The Privacy Act regulates the government’s collection, storage, and use of private information, and includes a private right of action for citizens to sue for abuses or violations. asserted
citizens → regulate → abuses
She accused government officials of violating her privacy by serving as confidential sources to Herridge. asserted
She → accuse → Herridge
Her counsel then subpoenaed Herridge and demanded that she reveal her sources. asserted
she → subpoena → sources
She refused. asserted
She → refuse → ?
Much of what Chen references in her filing was available in the public domain. asserted
Chen → reference → domain
For example, Stephen Rhoads, a whistleblower and former UMT employee, was an FBI informant in the case and said publicly that Chen had admitted to him that she had been a PLA colonel and told him to lie about that fact when he was called to testify before a federal grand jury. asserted
he → say → jury
Any viable claim is primarily based on the photos. uncertain
claim → base → photos
However, given all the other information in the public domain, it would have been difficult to argue that the photos caused Chen substantial harm. asserted
photos → give → harm
Her association and alleged hidden former rank as a PLA colonel led the government to take action against her and UMT. asserted
association → allege → her
However, Herridge had to litigate her claims of journalistic privilege in Washington, D.C. uncertain
Herridge → have → Washington
Despite being the single most important jurisdiction for investigative reporting, the federal courts in D.C. have long followed a more permissive approach to forcing the disclosure of confidential sources. asserted
courts → follow → sources
Not only did Herridge find herself in a less-than-optimal circuit, but her supporters also raised concerns about the assigned judge. asserted
supporters → find → judge
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee, is the husband of respected attorney Amy Jeffress, who has been referenced in past Herridge stories and represents clients who have been subjects of her investigative reporting. asserted
who → reference → reporting
In 2023, Judge Cooper ordered Herridge to identify her confidential sources. asserted
Cooper → order → sources
She refused. asserted
She → refuse → ?
Cooper then held her in contempt and imposed a crippling $800-a-day fine. asserted
her → hold → fine
The D.C. Circuit later upheld his order. asserted
Circuit → uphold → order
When Herridge asked the Supreme Court to intervene and stay the D.C. Circuit’s mandate it also declined (though Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated that he would have granted relief). asserted
he → ask → relief
She is now back on a final appeal, hoping four justices will let her present her case. asserted
her → hop → case
They should grant this petition and address the morass left by the ill-considered 1972 precedent in Branzburg v. Hayes. asserted
They → grant → Hayes
…and 21 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support