The Aporia
Fields, G. (2026, October 27). Who should be believed? Trump's social media post on golf course leads lawyers back to court. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-justice-department-united-states-washington-white-house-b3074507.html
Fields, Gary. “Who should be believed? Trump's social media post on golf course leads lawyers back to court.” The Independent, 27 Oct. 2026, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-justice-department-united-states-washington-white-house-b3074507.html.
Fields, Gary. “Who should be believed? Trump's social media post on golf course leads lawyers back to court.” The Independent, October 27, 2026. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-justice-department-united-states-washington-white-house-b3074507.html.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
On October 26, 2026, a federal judge barred the Trump administration from removing or damaging any additional trees on East Potomac Golf Course in Washington, D.C., pending the outcome of ongoing litigation. The judge's ruling requires the administration to provide ten business days' written advance notice before making any modifications to the park features. This decision follows weeks of controversy and tree-cutting at the public golf course.
Earlier that month, President Trump had announced plans to overhaul the course into a championship-level facility capable of hosting major events like the U.S. Open. However, hundreds of trees were felled without proper notice or adherence to environmental protocols, prompting legal challenges from conservation groups such as The D.C. Preservation League.
On October 29, 2026, the Justice Department confirmed Trump's plans in a court filing, stating that the National Park Service had entered into a new lease agreement with the National Links Trust, which will cease operating the East Potomac Golf Course as of November 15, 2026. The Interior Department aims to reconstruct the links on the Potomac River but faces pushback from environmental and preservation groups concerned about compliance with legal requirements.
The judge's ruling also highlights the administration’s efforts to bypass judicial scrutiny by requesting Judge Reyes' recusal based on alleged bias against them.
Not to believe him that a cabinet secretary has ‘developed’ a federal land project. Not to believe him that the secretary’s agency will destroy a historic golf course already on the land.