French Senate weighs Bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
AI generated
PARIS -
asserted
protesters → weigh → damage
The French Parliament’s Upper House on Oct 27 debated a controversial Bill that would make protesters financially liable for damage caused during street demonstrations, despite warnings from critics that it could curb the right to protest.
uncertain
it → debate → right
The Bill was drafted in response to riots that followed Paris Saint-Germain’s victory over Arsenal in the UEFA Champions League final in May.
uncertain
that → draft → May
But it has taken on added significance after weeks of protests over inequality and soaring prices culminated in some of the worst violence France has seen in years on Oct 17, when thousands of businesses across the country were damaged and looted.
asserted
thousands → take → country
The legislation, due to be voted on later on Oct 27 or Oct 28, was expected to receive strong backing in the Upper House, where a right-wing and centrist alliance holds a majority.
asserted
alliance → vote → majority
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen, whom opinion polls place as the frontrunner to succeed Emmanuel Macron in next spring’s presidential election, supports the legislation.
asserted
polls → place → legislation
Speaking in Parliament, Interior Minister Laurent Nunez stressed the “urgency” of responding to the damage and scenes of chaos seen on Oct 17.
asserted
Nunez → speak → Oct
“We can no longer allow the vast majority of our fellow citizens to pay for a minority of vandals,” he said.
asserted
he → allow → vandals
Under the legislation, protesters could be ordered to pay up to €10,000 (S$14,261) for damage caused during street demonstrations.
uncertain
protesters → order → demonstrations
But critics argue that people who took no part in vandalism could nonetheless be held liable if they were deemed to have been associated with those responsible.
uncertain
they → argue → those
The Bill introduces joint financial liability for anyone found to have “knowingly participated” in a group formed with the intent of carrying out acts of vandalism.
asserted
Bill → introduce → vandalism
It would also apply to individuals who “voluntarily” continued to take part in a gathering likely to disrupt public order after two police dispersal warnings.
asserted
who → apply → warnings
Welfare benefits and housing assistance could also be seized to help cover the cost of damages under the scheme, a provision that has drawn sharp criticism from left-wing parties and advocacy groups.
uncertain
that → seize → parties
Left-wing lawmakers accused the government of an “authoritarian drift” at the expense of the freedom to demonstrate.
Communist senator Fabien Gay denounced what he called a “legal travesty that deliberately conflates protesters and rioters”.
Green senator Melanie Vogel accused the government of responding to social demands with “collective punishment.”
Supporters of the Bill sought to reassure critics.
asserted
Supporters → accuse → critics
“We must not give the impression that this Bill would criminalise a passer-by or a peaceful protester,” said Olivier Bitz of the centre-right Horizons party.
asserted
Bitz → give → party
The legislation was expected to become even tougher during its passage through the Senate, where a large number of amendments have been tabled.
asserted
number → expect → amendments
The government has proposed introducing protest bans targeting the most violent individuals.
asserted
government → propose → individuals
Late on Oct 27, the Senate approved a Bill allowing authorities to demand the rapid removal of social media content calling for “insurrection or taking up arms against the state”.
asserted
authorities → approve → state
“As we speak, there are calls circulating for next Saturday that are calls for insurrection.
asserted
that → speak → insurrection
Those are the kinds of content we want to remove,” the interior minister told senators.
asserted
minister → want → senators
Platforms would be required to remove such content within 24 hours, or they could face “blocking” or “delisting.”
uncertain
they → require → blocking
In an op-ed published in French daily Le Monde last week, a coalition of trade unions and student groups warned of a “serious infringement on the freedom to demonstrate.”
asserted
coalition → publish → freedom
They argued the measures would disproportionately affect “the poorest families” and encourage “arbitrary police action.”
asserted
measures → argue → action
Amnesty International also urged the government to abandon the Bill, warning the measures could push “already marginalised families further into poverty.”
“If passed, this bill would be a deeply regressive step,” Nathalie Godard of Amnesty International France said on Oct 26.
uncertain
Godard → urge → Oct
“Seizing family allowances, housing assistance, or the active solidarity income could have disastrous consequences for some of the most vulnerable people.”
uncertain
Seizing → seize → people