Hidden Open Thread 445.5

Astral Codex Ten · collected 2026-08-18 · by Scott Alexander commentary
Read the original at Astral Codex Ten ↗

Summary

The New York Times has published a closed thread labeled "Hidden Open Thread 445.5" that can only be accessed by its paid subscribers. The article does not provide further information on the topic or context of this thread, as access is restricted to those who have a paid subscription. The exact date and location of the thread are also unknown due to lack of specific details in the article.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-18, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
0
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
no claims
nothing to measure
Leaning
not scored
needs a local LLM pass
Publisher trust
not scored
Commentary is not rated for newsroom trust
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Narrative spread
none derived
Analyzed 2026-08-18 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Unfortunately, there isn't enough information to provide a summary of the news story as the excerpt only mentions that it's a post for paid subscribers and doesn't contain any actual content. The metadata indicates that the article doesn't have a specific topic or narrative, but without access to the text itself, I'm unable to provide a summary.

Written for “Reddit Open Thread” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 1060 · logged 2026-08-25

Story

📰 Reddit Open Thread
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges an unknown share of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Hidden Open Thread 444.5 different event · 100%
Astral Codex Ten · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted
“The two articles refer to different open thread numbers (445.5 vs 444.5), indicating separate events”
Astral Codex Ten · 1.00 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted

Publisher

Astral Codex Ten · 25 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected

Commentary. The three signals behind a trust score all measure a newsroom's record with its own reporting, so they are not computed for this source. How trust is scored.

No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Scott Alexander
25 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 [This is one of the finalists in the 2026 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done.
🔮 This year’s survey will probably take 30 - 45 minutes.
2026-08-27 · assertive framing · Take The 2026 ACX Survey
🔮 It’s not necessarily wrong to deprioritize a topic because it vaguely reminds you of something that you have negative affect toward, but I would prefer these people admit they’re dismissing/ignoring it rather than claim to be engaging with it.
🔮 I don’t know, but he may have misinterpreted my original tweet as saying income doesn’t matter at all, in which case this data functions as an effective rebuttal.
2026-08-25 · assertive framing · Re: Re: Re: Pritchard On Liberal Happiness
🔮 [This is one of the finalists in the 2026 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done.
🔮 Matt says his highest priority colleges that don’t have an organizer yet are MIT, Claremont, Northwestern, Carnegie Mellon, Amherst, Notre Dame, Duke, CalTech, Georgetown, UCLA, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Harvard, NYU, Williams, GWU, American University, Rutgers, and UNC Chapel Hill.
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · Open Thread 448
🔮 We (ACX and an effective altruist organization called Nest who are sponsoring this) will give you free advertising and cover your costs.
2026-08-21 · assertive framing · College EA Meetups Everywhere: Call For Organizers
🔮 I remember when arguments about AI were things like “Sure, if you could magically get billions of dollars of compute, and magically scale AI up a thousand times, and magically get rid of hallucinations…” and the whole implausibility hinged on the word “magic”!
🔮 On average, commenters will end up spotting evidence that around two or three of the links in each links post are wrong or misleading.
2026-08-19 · assertive framing · Links For July 2026 (Part 2)
🔮 There are many reasons to believe in such assistance: Napoleon’s rise from Corsican nobody to Emperor and would-be world conqueror was a bizarre deviation from the usual pattern of history.
2026-08-19 · assertive framing · Why I'm Staying Out Of The Substack Religion Debate
More on this subject from Scott Alexander
Hidden Open Thread 444.5
2026-08-20 · Astral Codex Ten · 100% similar
Hidden Open Thread 448.5
2026-08-28 · Astral Codex Ten · 100% similar
Open Thread 445
2026-08-18 · Astral Codex Ten · 51% similar
Open Thread 448
2026-08-24 · Astral Codex Ten · 51% similar
All 25 articles by Scott Alexander →

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

No subjects extracted.

Narrative

No narrative derived. That requires at least one asserted claim.

Claims (0 extracted, 0 hedged)

No claims extracted from this article.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support