For three decades, the recruitment industry treated Andrew Woosnam well.
asserted
industry → treat → Woosnam
Having learned his trade during the 1990s, he graduated to create his own firm at the turn of the millennium – which allowed him to bank millions of pounds in salary, dividends and loans and to buy assets including a grand house in Berkshire once owned by the comedians Dawn French and Lenny Henry.
asserted
him → learn → comedians
But life has become much tougher of late for Woosnam, whose recruitment business has twice entered insolvency proceedings since September last year.
asserted
business → become → September
His three-hectare (six-acre) property – which cost £2.2m in 2013 – is now being eyed by insolvency professionals chasing him on behalf of creditors owed more than £3m by his bust companies, including more than £1m due to the UK taxpayer.
asserted
which → cost → taxpayer
This all represents a stark change in how Woosnam’s Premier Group Recruitment appeared just a few years ago, when it was trumpeting its status as an award-winning business.
asserted
it → represent → business
Woosnam owned 99% of the shares in the company, which went into administration in September 2025 owing £2.9m, including £647,000 to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), who had begun enforcement proceedings against it.
asserted
who → own → it
The recruiter’s assets were acquired three days later by a new company, called PGGBR Ltd, also owned by Woosnam, who made an initial £10,000 payment and promised administrators he would transfer a further £600,000 via monthly £25,000 instalments over the subsequent two years.
asserted
he → acquire → years
Adding up the future promised payments meant Woosnam theoretically trumped the £321,000 of cash offered by a competing bidder for Premier’s assets, although his detractors might argue that this arrangement had all the hallmarks of a structure that has been criticised as being highly risky for creditors: pre-pack administrations.
uncertain
that → add → creditors
These can allow a connected party to buy back a business on a deferred consideration, and have been cited in a series of studies that appear to show they tend to result in worse outcomes.
asserted
they → allow → outcomes
So it transpired in the Woosnam case.
asserted
it → transpire → case
The payments he had promised from his phoenixed business failed to materialise, while the new company ran up a further £400,000 debt to HMRC, according to the latest Companies House filings.
uncertain
company → promise → filings
The Guardian approached one of the Premier Group joint administrators based at KRE Corporate Recovery but he did not return phone calls asking about the case.
asserted
he → approach → case
Woosnam had received a £1.2m director’s loan from the defunct Premier Group and had taken dividends out of the company totalling almost £2m since 2022.
asserted
Woosnam → receive → 2022
He also appears to have received a further £200,000 via a director’s loan from PGGBR before the new phoenix company was placed into liquidation last month.
asserted
company → appear → liquidation
If that sounds terminal, there is a possibility you may have underestimated Woosnam, whose twice-bust business now appears to have resurfaced for a third time.
uncertain
business → sound → time
While it is unclear if the businessman is behind the rebirth or not, at least eight of Premier Group’s former staff now say they are working for a new recruitment brand called Xpertis Talent, which was created in July 2026 and looks so much like the two insolvent Woosnam companies that even employees seem confused.
uncertain
employees → say → companies
One Xpertis recruitment consultant, who previously worked for Premier Group, has attributed an industry award won by the original company in 2022 to the fresh venture in marketing materials posted on the professional networking site LinkedIn.
asserted
who → work → site
Another employee has posted on LinkedIn that he started working for the third company before it had even been registered with Companies House.
asserted
it → post → House
Woosnam, who did not respond to invitations to comment, is not a shareholder of the latest company, which Companies House filings show is wholly owned by an individual based in Thailand.
asserted
filings → respond → Thailand
Woosnam is understood to have Thai family, although it is unclear if they are connected to the new business.
uncertain
they → understand → business
The Aporia
