LORD ASHCROFT: Britons are split into five 'tribes' on climate change but many agree on one thing... why do our best if the others keep polluting?

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Ashcroft, L. (2026, October 24). LORD ASHCROFT: Britons are split into five 'tribes' on climate change but many agree on one thing... why do our best if the others keep polluting? Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16235873/LORD-ASHCROFT-Britons-tribes-climate-change.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-24 · by Lord Ashcroft analysis

Quick Summary

Not summarized yet. This article was analyzed before summaries existed, or the model was unreachable at the time. python maintenance.py backfill-article-summaries fills these in.

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Lord Ashcroft's latest poll identifies five distinct groups among Britons regarding climate change: Impatient Idealists, Committed Contributors, Squeezed Sympathisers, Cautious Pragmatists, and Staunch Sceptics. The survey reveals nuanced opinions within these categories; for instance, while some advocate for rapid action and increased spending on environmental initiatives, others emphasize affordability concerns or question the necessity of urgent transitions to Net Zero. This division is expected to play a significant role in upcoming elections as climate change becomes a major political issue.

Written for “British Climate Change Tribes Debate Responsibility” on 2026-10-25, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 104790: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-24

Story

📰 British Climate Change Tribes Debate Responsibility
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 44 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 7321 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Lord Ashcroft
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And with the issue set to become a major election battleground, they need a good deal of convincing that sensible answers are at hand.
🔮 My survey finds him comfortably ahead of his rivals as the best available Prime Minister, and he has single-handedly revived Labour's poll standing as more of its disgruntled 2024 voters say they could see themselves backing the party again next time.
Also by Lord Ashcroft
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Jackdaw Rosebank The Mail on Sunday

Subjects

Andy Burnham PERSON · 2× John Healey PERSON · 2× Rosebank ORG · 2× Aberdeen GPE · 1× Energy ORG · 1× Jackdaw ORG · 1× Labour Party ORG · 1× Miatta Fahnbulleh PERSON · 1× Norway GPE · 1× The Mail on Sunday ORG · 1×

Narrative

Impatient Idealists want faster action and think Net Zero is worth paying for; Committed Contributors are the most likely to have changed their own behaviour; Squeezed Sympathisers believe the climate is changing but say they can't afford to pay more; Cautious Pragmatists are not hostile to the environmental agenda but prioritise other things; and Staunch Sceptics think the threat is exaggerated and resist bigger bills. Even within these groups, opinion is nuanced.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-24
🔮 And with the issue set to become a major election battleground, they need a good deal of convincing that sensible answers are at hand.

Claims (44 extracted, 0 hedged)

As with so much else, the public debate on climate change and what to do about it seems polarised between two extremes. asserted
debate → do → extremes
Yet as my polling often finds, the voters are a good deal smarter and more thoughtful than this. asserted
voters → find → this
And with the issue set to become a major election battleground, they need a good deal of convincing that sensible answers are at hand. asserted
answers → set → hand
My research finds that the public divides into five 'tribes' on this question. asserted
public → find → question
Impatient Idealists want faster action and think Net Zero is worth paying for; Committed Contributors are the most likely to have changed their own behaviour; Squeezed Sympathisers believe the climate is changing but say they can't afford to pay more; Cautious Pragmatists are not hostile to the environmental agenda but prioritise other things; and Staunch Sceptics think the threat is exaggerated and resist bigger bills. Even within these groups, opinion is nuanced. asserted
opinion → want → groups
Many of the most climate-conscious also worry about their energy costs and wonder how far we can rely on wind and solar power. asserted
we → worry → power
Those at the sceptical end doubt the wisdom of dashing to Net Zero ahead of other countries. asserted
Those → doubt → countries
But few of them deny that climate change is real or that human activity is a factor. asserted
activity → deny → them
The debate is over what action is needed, how fast it should go, and who should pay for it all. asserted
who → need → it
Clear answers are hard to come by because there are few trusted sources to provide them. asserted
answers → come → them
Voters have not forgotten a previous government encouraging people to buy diesel cars (to help combat climate change, indeed) only for its successors to clobber them. asserted
successors → forget → them
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has come under scrutiny for the government's hesistant approach over Jackdaw Jackdaw has been given production approval after years of legal battles with environmental campaigners. asserted
Jackdaw → come → campaigners
A decision has yet to be made on whether to approve Rosebank (Pictured: A flare off on North Sea oil platform) asserted
decision → have → platform
Chancellor John Healey will announce the UK Autumn Budget 2026 on Wednesday. asserted
Healey → announce → Wednesday
He is set to approve oil drilling at the controversial Rosebank oil and gas site asserted
He → set → site
To many, green schemes always seem like an excuse to raise tax. asserted
schemes → seem → tax
Businesses are suspected of using climate change as cover for higher prices. asserted
Businesses → suspect → prices
Environmental groups will naturally want to present the worst-case scenario. asserted
groups → want → scenario
Even climate scientists, who must be funded from somewhere and whose findings must surely be open to interpretation, are not considered unimpeachable. asserted
findings → fund → interpretation
Overall, I found the balance of opinion (by no means unanimous) was that achieving Net Zero would probably mean higher costs for their households, and that tackling climate change was outranked by affordability and independence from foreign suppliers when we asked what mattered most when it came to energy policy. asserted
it → find → policy
They were also more likely than not to favour new oil and gas exploration. asserted
They → favour → exploration
Last week, the Government gave the go-ahead to the long-planned Jackdaw gas field, while today The Mail on Sunday reports Prime Minister Andy Burnham and his Chancellor John Healey will approve oil drilling at the more controversial Rosebank site. asserted
Burnham → give → site
The decision will be popular with the public, though not the wider Labour Party whose ban on new exploration, I found, was backed by only one in three voters. asserted
I → find → voters
Many thought it absurd to forbid ourselves from drilling while cheerfully importing North Sea oil from Norway. asserted
it → think → Norway
At the same time, many saw Net Zero as an opportunity rather than a burden, holding out the prospect of new industries, new jobs and, ultimately, cheaper energy. asserted
many → see → industries
The policies for achieving it were another question. asserted
policies → achieve → it
The Jackdaw gas production platform, 155 miles east of Aberdeen Drone footage shows the Jackdaw gas field at sea. asserted
footage → show → sea
Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh has now approved production at the field Testing hypothetical ideas, majorities favoured new wind and solar farms, more nuclear power stations, and taxes on frequent flyers and high-carbon goods – provided the revenues made their way back to them in some form. asserted
revenues → approve → form
But, perhaps unsurprisingly, the closer to home the ideas got, the more resistance they encountered. asserted
they → get → resistance
Traffic charges, banning petrol and diesel cars, phasing out gas boilers and charging more for meat and dairy products to reflect their emissions went down considerably less well. asserted
charges → ban → emissions
Two things were clear: many have had enough of politicians 'policing your household', as one of my focus group participants put it. asserted
one → have → it
'I'm fed up with the Government going, 'You've got to do this', 'you've got to do that',' they added. asserted
they → feed → that
The second conclusion was that people's patience with ever-rising costs and taxes is at an end. asserted
patience → rise → end
'It's any excuse to put a tax on something,' said a contributor, who urged firms to 'be environmentally friendly but don't charge us extra for the privilege of it'. asserted
who → put → it
Just under half said they didn't know how much Net Zero policies added to their energy bills, and almost as many said they were unwilling to pay more. asserted
they → say → more
Who, then, should pay for the transition to greener energy? asserted
Who → pay → energy
Big businesses, energy companies and high-polluting individuals were the most popular targets, predictably enough. asserted
businesses → pollute → ?
Some argued that this would soon amount to the same thing: higher business costs would ultimately be extracted from customers, just as government largesse is ultimately paid for by taxpayers. asserted
largesse → argue → taxpayers
Looming over this is a question that bothers even some of the most environmentally minded: what is the point of Britain making expensive efforts to cut its small share of global emissions if bigger countries are not doing the same? asserted
countries → loom → same
Voters overall agree by an 18-point margin that the UK achieving Net Zero will make little or no difference to climate change. asserted
achieving → agree → change
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support