Chiefs, Opposition call for Alberta government to drop appeal of decision that quashed separation petition

Read the original at CBC News ↗
Cite

Keiller, J. (2026, October 23). Chiefs, Opposition call for Alberta government to drop appeal of decision that quashed separation petition. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/chiefs-call-government-drop-appeal-separation-petition-9.7394085?cmp=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

CBC News · collected 2026-10-23 · by Jennifer Keiller

Quick Summary

First Nation chiefs and the NDP leader are urging the Alberta government to abandon its appeal of a judge’s decision that nullified a petition for a separation referendum. The petition gathered over 300,000 signatures earlier this year from supporters of an independent Alberta. Despite calls to drop the legal challenge to repair relationships and respect Albertans’ rejection of separation in recent voting, Justice Minister Mickey Amery maintains that the government will proceed with its appeal due to perceived errors of law related to consultation requirements.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-23, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Summary unavailable.

Written for “Alberta Government Appeal Called For Dropping” on 2026-10-24, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 103112 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-23

Story

📰 Alberta Government Appeal Called For Dropping
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 26% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 23% hedged 5 of 22 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A describes the outcome of a referendum vote in Alberta, while Article B discusses calls from First Nation chiefs and the opposition for the government to drop its appeal following the referendum.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 22% hedged 9 of 40 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article A describes the outcome of a referendum where Alberta voters rejected separatism, while Article B discusses calls for the government to drop an appeal regarding a previous petition on separation after the referendum has taken place.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 30 📰 publisher trust 69
“The articles describe different stages of the Alberta separation process: one about voting on a referendum and another about calling for the government to drop an appeal regarding the petition.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A describes the voting process in a non-binding separation referendum on October 19th, while Article B discusses calls for the government to drop an appeal following the completion of the referendum.”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 4 of 28 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A reports on Premier Danielle Smith's speech after a referendum, while Article B discusses calls for the government to drop an appeal regarding a separation petition, referencing the same general situation but describing different specific events.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 46 📰 publisher trust 53
“The articles discuss related topics but describe different events - one is about Premier Danielle Smith's post-referendum stance and promises, while the other is about calls to drop an appeal regarding a separation petition.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 20% hedged 9 of 46 📰 publisher trust 74
“Article A discusses the loss of a vote by Alberta separatists and their continued internal struggle within Danielle Smith's party, while Article B focuses on calls from First Nation chiefs for the government to drop its appeal regarding a decision that quashed a separation petition.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
26%
9 of 35 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
74/100
CBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBC News · 1525 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jennifer Keiller
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Crowfoot says doing so could help repair the relationship between First Nations and the province — a relationship, he says, right now is “fractured.”
🔮 Albertans will cast their ballots in a historic referendum Monday, weighing in on 10 questions about the future of the province.
🔮 “I'm just saying, you're quite a crystal ball if you would say that it would never be in the cards.
🔮 Even if a poll came out and said we were winning, I would ignore it and keep going as though we're not,” he said.
🔮 The Janet Brown Opinion Research Poll for CBC News suggests 41 per cent of respondents would vote for the UCP if an election were held today, while 41 per cent would vote for the NDP.
🔮 At least 21 additional party constituency groups would need to adopt similar positions to require a special vote on a leader’s future, similar to the internal dissent that ultimately led United Conservatives to prematurely end Jason Kenney’s leadership four years ago.
🔮 What timing of a second referendum in Alberta could look like, if it were to happen Premier's office says it would come 'as soon as possible,' if majority voted for it Albertans will vote next month on the possibility of a second referendum on separation, but exactly when that referendum — if a majority voted for it — would happen, remains somewhat murky.
Also by Jennifer Keiller
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Jennifer Keiller →

Topics

Alberta Albertans First Nations Siksika Nation the First Nations

Subjects

Alberta GPE · 5× Albertans NORP · 3× Sylvestre PERSON · 3× Crowfoot PERSON · 2× First Nations NORP · 2× Mitch Sylvestre PERSON · 2× Siksika Nation NORP · 2× the First Nations GPE · 2× First Nation NORP · 1× Province ORG · 1×

Narrative

Justice Minister Mickey Amery said in a statement the government believes the "decision contained errors of law." "Citizens should not have to meet a duty to consult to gather signatures from fellow citizens on a citizen initiative petition," Amery said.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-23
🔮 Crowfoot says doing so could help repair the relationship between First Nations and the province — a relationship, he says, right now is “fractured.”

Claims (35 extracted, 9 hedged)

Chiefs, Opposition call for Alberta government to drop appeal of decision that quashed separation petition Province says it won't be doing that asserted
it → drop → that
With the Alberta referendum now in the books, some First Nation chiefs are calling on the provincial government to drop its appeal of a judge’s decision to quash the citizen petition on separation. asserted
chiefs → call → separation
“I mean, now that the referendum’s happened, the issue’s moot,” said Siksika Nation Chief Samuel Crowfoot. asserted
Crowfoot → mean → ?
“[Premier Danielle Smith] said up and down that she's not going to pursue another referendum. asserted
she → say → referendum
Well, I think now’s the chance for her to put action to those words and to drop that appeal.” asserted
her → think → appeal
Crowfoot says doing so could help repair the relationship between First Nations and the province — a relationship, he says, right now is “fractured.” uncertain
he → say → Nations
"The people said it straight out: we are not going to go through a separation. asserted
we → say → separation
So my question would be is: why hang on to a process that the Alberta people gave her no mandate to speak on?" asserted
people → hang → mandate
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Chief Allan Adam said. asserted
Adam → say → ?
At issue is a petition led by pro-independence group Stay Free Alberta to prompt the province to consider a referendum question on separation. asserted
petition → lead → separation
It garnered more than 300,000 signatures earlier this year. asserted
It → garner → signatures
NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi echoed the chiefs' calls at a news conference Friday morning. asserted
Nenshi → echo → conference
“Certainly the First Nations are spending money on lawyers, we taxpayers are spending money on lawyers, let’s listen to what Albertans said on Monday and just drop it,” Nenshi said. asserted
Nenshi → spend → it
The province, however, says it won't be doing that. asserted
it → say → that
Justice Minister Mickey Amery said in a statement the government believes the "decision contained errors of law." "Citizens should not have to meet a duty to consult to gather signatures from fellow citizens on a citizen initiative petition," Amery said. asserted
Amery → say → petition
The legal picture so far Four First Nations — Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Siksika Nation, Blood Tribe and Piikani Nation — challenged the process involving Stay Free Alberta’s citizen petition. asserted
Nations → challenge → petition
In May, Justice Shaina Leonard ruled that there had been a failure to consult with the First Nations, and she overturned Elections Alberta’s approval of the petition. uncertain
she → rule → petition
Because of that ruling, the government’s question on the Oct. 19 referendum ballot asked if Albertans supported the province starting the legal process to hold a second, binding referendum on separation. asserted
province → ask → separation
The government launched an appeal of Leonard’s decision. asserted
government → launch → decision
Mitch Sylvestre, who led the petition drive, is also appealing it. asserted
who → lead → it
Crowfoot said he does not expect Sylvestre to drop his appeal. asserted
Sylvestre → say → appeal
“So, we’ll handle Mitch’s, but Danielle should drop hers on the part of the government of Alberta,” he said. asserted
he → handle → Alberta
Mitch Sylvestre hold boxes of signatures before submitting them for a separation referendum to Elections Alberta in Edmonton on May 4, 2026. uncertain
Sylvestre → hold → May
For his part, Sylvestre says he would like to see the government continue its appeal. asserted
government → say → appeal
“I think, moving forward for democracy here in Alberta, it's very important that they have to appeal that,” Sylvestre said. asserted
Sylvestre → think → that
“Because, I mean, this is a very contentious question, but there's gonna be other questions that somebody's going to disagree with. asserted
somebody → mean → that
And, you know, all of a sudden, I can see that it won't be long they won't be able to ask any questions. asserted
they → know → questions
According to unofficial results, Albertans voted 75 per cent in favour of the province remaining a part of Canada. uncertain
province → accord → Canada
What could happen next? uncertain
What → happen → ?
Because there are two appeals, the process would continue regardless if the government dropped its appeal, said Kathleen Mahoney, professor emeritus at the University of Calgary's faculty of law. asserted
Mahoney → be → law
Continuing its appeal could also give the government more clarity going forward, she said. uncertain
she → continue → clarity
“They may want to know exactly when in a government process that affects Indigenous rights a consultation has to take place,” she said. uncertain
she → want → place
Constitutional experts have told CBC News that if an appeal is granted, the petition could indeed move forward. uncertain
petition → tell → News
“If the [appeal] court agrees with the court below, it's over,” Mahoney said. asserted
Mahoney → agree → court
“But if the court decides that the consultation could have taken place later in the process, well, then we're into a different scenario.” In the latter case, it would trigger a requirement for the government to deal with the initial citizen petition, she said, but there is no timeline set for when that would need to happen. uncertain
that → decide → petition
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support