Trump's corporate stakes are a gift to the next Democratic president

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

DeHaven, T. (2026, October 23). Trump's corporate stakes are a gift to the next Democratic president. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trumps-corporate-stakes-gift-next-democratic-president

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-23 · by Tad DeHaven

Quick Summary

The Trump administration has taken ownership stakes in 40 private companies through deals announced or completed by the Commerce Department. Former Biden officials are contemplating using these government-owned stakes to pressure gun, oil, and AI companies under future Democratic presidencies. Critics warn that while Republicans currently support such actions, a shift could occur if Democrats gain control, making it difficult for Congress to allow this practice to continue uninterrupted.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-23, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Trump administration has taken significant steps to increase government stakes in private companies, with the Commerce Department adding four more deals recently. This brings the total number of corporate ownership stakes under the Trump presidency to 40. Critics argue that future Democratic administrations could use these stakes to pressure companies on issues like gun control and oil production, or to regulate industries such as AI more strictly. Democrats see potential in using government shares to influence corporate behavior, a scenario that was previously warned about by commentators early in Trump's second term.

Written for “Trump Corporate Interests” on 2026-10-23, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 102789 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-23

Story

📰 Trump Corporate Interests
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 20% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 28% hedged 10 of 36 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles discuss Trump's administration taking equity stakes in private companies, but they focus on different aspects and implications over time.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
41
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
8 of 41 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 5247 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tad DeHaven
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Those inclined to applaud the president’s dealmaking should consider what a Democratic president might do with those stakes after Trump is no longer in office.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Congress Democratic Republicans Washington the Commerce Department

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 7× Intel ORG · 4× Republicans NORP · 4× Biden PERSON · 3× Democratic NORP · 3× Washington GPE · 3× Congress ORG · 2× Republican NORP · 2× the Cato Institute’s ORG · 1× the Commerce Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

I warned about this two weeks into Trump’s second term after he signed an executive order seeking to create a sovereign wealth fund, noting that a government investment fund would eventually become a vehicle for Democratic administrations to pursue policies Republicans oppose.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-23
🔮 Those inclined to applaud the president’s dealmaking should consider what a Democratic president might do with those stakes after Trump is no longer in office.
2026-10-23 · Fox News
Trump's corporate stakes are a gift to the next Democratic president · assertive framing

Claims (41 extracted, 8 hedged)

The Trump administration has now announced or completed deals to take ownership stakes in 40 private companies. asserted
administration → announce → companies
Just this week, the Commerce Department added four more proposed stakes to the running count we maintain at the Cato Institute’s Restoring Free Enterprise initiative. asserted
we → add → initiative
Those inclined to applaud the president’s dealmaking should consider what a Democratic president might do with those stakes after Trump is no longer in office. uncertain
Trump → incline → office
Democrats are certainly thinking about it. asserted
Democrats → think → it
Semafor reports that former Biden officials are licking their chops at the prospect of using government ownership to pressure gun and oil companies. asserted
officials → report → companies
Doug Farrar, who worked for then-Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan during the Biden administration, sees a future president leveraging government ownership to turn the screws on AI companies, "especially a Democrat who wants to seriously regulate this industry." asserted
who → work → industry
Remember when the Biden administration bullied social media platforms to remove content it didn’t like during the COVID pandemic? asserted
it → remember → pandemic
That was done without government ownership. asserted
That → do → ownership
I warned about this two weeks into Trump’s second term after he signed an executive order seeking to create a sovereign wealth fund, noting that a government investment fund would eventually become a vehicle for Democratic administrations to pursue policies Republicans oppose. asserted
Republicans → warn → policies
The White House ditched the idea for a formal fund and proceeded to cobble together an ad hoc presidential portfolio despite having no clear legal authority to do so. asserted
House → ditch → authority
If a Democratic administration had done this, it would be practically impossible to imagine a Congress controlled by Republicans allowing it to continue. asserted
it → do → Republicans
And yet congressional Republicans, who never miss a chance to tag Democrats as socialists and communists, have collectively done nothing to stop the Trump administration. asserted
who → miss → administration
In fact, congressional Republicans are actively trying to give the executive branch—and thus future administrations, not just the current administration—the legal authority to continue doing it. asserted
Republicans → try → it
The Trump administration’s supporters cite its claims that equity stakes are better for taxpayers than blank checks, or that they are necessary to bolster supply chains for national security. uncertain
they → cite → security
Setting aside that they aren’t the administration’s true motivation, neither justifies Washington becoming a shareholder in a portfolio of companies. asserted
Washington → set → companies
Sure, if the government is already handing a company money, getting shares in return sounds better than a straight giveaway. asserted
getting → hand → giveaway
But the trade-offs can’t be ignored. asserted
offs → ignore → ?
Even if the administration could sell its entire Intel stake today, it would only net roughly $28 billion. uncertain
it → sell → billion
That's less than 1.5% of the $2 trillion deficit Washington ran up in the fiscal year just ended under President Trump and a Republican-controlled Congress. asserted
Washington → run → Trump
When the government picks a racehorse, that horse is given advantages and privileges that leave the competing horses at a disadvantage. asserted
that → pick → disadvantage
But the danger goes well beyond current competitors. asserted
danger → go → competitors
Upstart firms, including those that don’t yet exist, already face a steep hill to climb in bringing their products and ideas to market. asserted
that → include → market
Government ownership steepens that hill, threatening to stifle the entrepreneurial spirit critical to America’s economic success. asserted
ownership → steepen → success
Realizing the gains requires selling the shares and subtracting what taxpayers put in. asserted
taxpayers → realize → what
And as my colleague Scott Lincicome explains, Intel’s stock gains partly reflect expectations of government favoritism, including pressure on other companies to use Intel products. asserted
gains → explain → products
That points to the possibility that the government is diverting private investment from businesses with better commercial prospects. asserted
government → point → prospects
Even if the administration could sell its entire Intel stake today, it would net roughly $28 billion—less than 1.5% of the $2 trillion deficit Washington ran up in the fiscal year just ended under President Trump and a Republican-controlled Congress. uncertain
Washington → sell → Trump
The stakes the administration has acquired should be divested, regardless. asserted
administration → acquire → ?
But if the administration wants to raise funds productively, it could revisit Cato’s recommendations to sell excess federal buildings and privatize government businesses like Amtrak. uncertain
it → want → Amtrak
The national security rationale also sounds reasonable until you realize the federal government already has plenty of ways to support companies on such grounds without becoming an owner. asserted
government → sound → grounds
Our Restoring Free Enterprise initiative lays out both market-based and government alternatives to equity stakes that would help bolster critical supply chains. asserted
that → restore → chains
Easing permitting requirements and removing tariffs on production inputs would make it easier for private companies to invest and expand supply. asserted
companies → ease → supply
And the government can address specific defense needs through purchase contracts or stockpiles of critical materials. Invoking "national security" also has a long-standing tradition in Washington as an excuse for politicians to justify actions they might not otherwise get away with. uncertain
they → address → actions
Back in April, the administration pursued a bailout that could have given the government 90% of Spirit Airlines on dubious national security grounds, until a group of the airline’s bondholders balked at the terms. uncertain
group → pursue → terms
Last week, Politico reported that the Federal Aviation Administration is exploring an ownership stake in a company that develops software for managing air traffic control. asserted
that → report → control
National security or not, having the government become an investor in a company it is supposed to evaluate objectively is an objectively bad idea. asserted
it → become → company
Defenders will also point to promises that the government will remain a passive shareholder and argue that concerns about federal control over the corporate boardroom are overblown. asserted
concerns → point → boardroom
That’s a painfully naïve view of how Washington works. asserted
Washington → ’ → ?
The Trump administration is already using contracts and regulatory authority to favor companies it owns. asserted
it → use → companies
While Trump’s supporters may applaud that favoritism today, will they still applaud when a President Gavin Newsom or President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez does it? uncertain
Newsom → applaud → it
…and 1 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support