Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may have to give evidence in High Court fraud case after gifts up to £750,000 were received from an elderly Turkish woman

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Greenhill, S. (2026, October 23). Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may have to give evidence in High Court fraud case after gifts up to £750,000 were received from an elderly Turkish woman. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16233451/Andrew-Mountbatten-Windsor-faces-having-evidence-High-Court-fraud-case-business-dealings-received-750-000-elderly-Turkish-woman.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-23 · by Sam Greenhill

Quick Summary

A High Court judge ruled that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may have to give evidence in a fraud case involving former Goldman Sachs banker Selman Turk and Turkish millionairess Nebahat Isbilen. Mrs Isbilen claims she was defrauded into making payments, including £750,000 as a "gift" for Princess Beatrice's wedding, totaling up to £750,000 to the Duke of York and his family. The judge agreed that Turk can seek to call Mountbatten-Windsor as a witness despite no wrongdoing being suggested against him or his family.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-23, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 23, 2026, a High Court judge ruled that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may have to give evidence in a fraud case involving businessman Selman Turk and Turkish national Nebahat Isbilen. The trial is set to begin in November. Ms Isbilen claims that Mr Turk misled her over a £750,000 payment made to Andrew, who was then the Duke of York, in 2019; this sum was later repaid by the Yorks to Mrs Isbilen in 2023. The judge's decision allows Mr Turk to seek evidence from Mr Mountbatten-Windsor and likely requires a witness summons if issued more than seven days before trial start. Andrew is not accused of any wrongdoing, but he has been drawn into the case due to business dealings with Mr Turk.

Written for “Andrew Called To Give Evidence” on 2026-10-24, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Andrew Called To Give Evidence
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 1 of 4 📰 publisher trust 65
“Both articles describe the High Court case where Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may be called to give evidence regarding a £750,000 payment from Nebahat Isbilen to him in 2019, with Selman Turk being sued for alleged misleading actions.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
12
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
1 of 12 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
64/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 7281 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sam Greenhill
16 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Last night, the Sussexes said they still had a copy and offered to share it with police if officers could not locate it.
🔮 He said the effect of his ruling was 'to give Mr Turk permission to seek to call evidence from Mr Mountbatten-Windsor', adding: 'In practice this will likely involve him issuing a witness summons, which can be done without further permission of the Court provided the summons is issued more than seven days before the start of trial.'
🔮 Although Bevan was never accused of being a spy, some of his comrades almost certainly were, including Morpeth MP William Owen, the files chronicle.
🔮 Ministers castigated over the Afghan superinjunction scandal that shut out democracy have vowed they would do the same again.
🔮 Ms Karmy-Jones said: 'She remembers the weight of him on top of her, she couldn't move.
🔮 Tinks riding Benny at Tweseldown Horse Trials on March 15, 2026 Benny was 'the kindest horse you would ever come across', said Tinks's mother Netia Walker.
🔮 Migrants will be allowed to sit their British citizenship tests online rather than at a test centre – raising fears of cheating.
🔮 That came after the former prince said he would no longer use the title Duke of York following new revelations about his friendship with Epstein and renewed sexual abuse allegations by Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre in her posthumous memoir.
🔮 Prince William was pictured with his dog Orla and three of her puppies in a photo taken by his wife Kate and released by Kensington Palace in 2025 Last year's annual black pudding throwing contest was won by 18-year-old Harry Ogden, who managed to knock six Yorkshire puddings from the 20ft high plinth Peta's campaign to replace fish with a cabbage at the annual mackerel festival is one of the political stunts that the charities regulator has been asked to investigate Peta raised £7.7million in donations last year.
🔮 The story about the Pogroms makes sense, but the Holocaust element is confusing because it is unclear why his ancestors would have fled Nazi-occupied Poland if they had been born in Britain before Germany invaded Poland in 1939.
Also by Sam Greenhill
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by Sam Greenhill →

Topics

Goldman Sachs High Court The High Court Turkish

Subjects

Turk PERSON · 7× Andrew PERSON · 4× Isbilen PERSON · 3× Mountbatten-Windsor PERSON · 3× Goldman Sachs ORG · 2× Yorks PERSON · 2× Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor PERSON · 1× Nebahat Isbilen PERSON · 1× The High Court ORG · 1× Turkish NORP · 1×

Narrative

He said the effect of his ruling was 'to give Mr Turk permission to seek to call evidence from Mr Mountbatten-Windsor', adding: 'In practice this will likely involve him issuing a witness summons, which can be done without further permission of the Court provided the summons is issued more than seven days before the start of trial.'
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-23
🔮 He said the effect of his ruling was 'to give Mr Turk permission to seek to call evidence from Mr Mountbatten-Windsor', adding: 'In practice this will likely involve him issuing a witness summons, which can be done without further permission of the Court provided the summons is issued more than seven days before the start of trial.'

Claims (12 extracted, 1 hedged)

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor can be called to give evidence about his business dealings, a judge ruled today. asserted
judge → call → dealings
The High Court granted permission to a former Goldman Sachs banker to call evidence from the former Duke of York. asserted
Court → grant → York
Andrew is not accused of any wrongdoing and the case is not about him, but he has been drawn into it after gifts of up to £750,000 were made. The case involves an elderly Turkish millionairess, Nebahat Isbilen. asserted
case → accuse → millionairess
Mrs Isbilen claimed she was conned into giving some of her fortune to the then Prince Andrew and his family by former Goldman Sachs banker and alleged fraudster Selman Turk, who had won an award at Andrew’s Dragons Den-style initiative Pitch@Palace. asserted
who → claim → initiative
According to claims in her complex and long-running High Court case, she alleged Mr Turk had stolen millions from her. uncertain
Turk → accord → her
The Yorks were dragged into the mystery which involved Mr Turk arranging payments of £350,000 to Andrew, £225,000 to the Duchess of York, £25,000 to Princess Eugenie and a £750,000 ‘gift’ for Princess Beatrice’s wedding. asserted
Turk → drag → wedding
There was no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the Yorks, and they reached an agreement with Mrs Isbilen in 2023 to repay her an undisclosed amount of money. asserted
they → be → money
Ms Isbilen alleges that Mr Turk, her former adviser, misled her over the payments made to the then-duke and his family in 2019. asserted
Turk → allege → 2019
Mr Turk denies dishonesty and made a bid to be allowed to call Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to give evidence at the trial. asserted
Turk → deny → trial
In a judgment today, Mr Justice Adam Johnson agreed and allowed Mr Turk to rely on a witness summary, as well as giving him permission to seek to call evidence from Mr Mountbatten-Windsor. asserted
Turk → agree → Windsor
The judge said: 'Given the seriousness of the allegations, both on their own terms and in light of their wider impact, fairness requires that Mr Turk should be afforded an opportunity of putting forward his own case, using the evidence he considers relevant and material.' asserted
he → say → evidence
He said the effect of his ruling was 'to give Mr Turk permission to seek to call evidence from Mr Mountbatten-Windsor', adding: 'In practice this will likely involve him issuing a witness summons, which can be done without further permission of the Court provided the summons is issued more than seven days before the start of trial.' asserted
summons → say → trial
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support