"The six plaintiffs in Judicial Watch's suit "do not identify as Black," he said, but have ties to Evanston and would have qualified for a $25,000 payment "but for the color of their skin."
Supreme Court precedent has held that race-based programs must generally be designed to remedy specific, documented discrimination, and Bekesha believes Evanston's program violates that requirement.
"Under the Constitution, everyone has to be treated equally when it comes to the color of their skin," he said."
Framing: assertive ·
First seen: 2026-09-14 ·
Last seen: 2026-09-14 ·
Spread: 1 articles