📖 Narrative

"Unhappily for them, years' worth of Supreme Court precedent holds that section 371 “is not confined to fraud as that term has been defined in the common law,” see Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855, 861, 86 S.Ct. 1840, 16 L.Ed.2d 973 (1966) ; that defrauding the government under section 371 means obstructing the operation of any government agency by any “deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest,” see Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188, 44 S.Ct. 511, 68 L.Ed. 968 (1924) ; and that the conspiracies need not aim to deprive the government of property or money, see id., because the act is written “broad enough ... to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful function of any” government “department,” see Haas v. Henkel, 216 U.S. 462, 479, 30 S.Ct. 249, 54 L.Ed. 569 (1910)."
Framing: assertive · First seen: 2026-09-05 · Last seen: 2026-09-05 · Spread: 1 articles

Propagation Over Time

Articles carrying this narrative

2026-09-05 · The Popehat Report
The National Review Is Still Lying To You About The Fraud Charge Against Trump assertive

🤖 AI Analyst Summary

Generating summary…
Written from 1 article, last analysed 2026-09-05. The text itself is generated again each time this page is opened.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support