"Subsequently, the she approached the Supreme Court against the decision, but the SC office returned the petition as being not maintainable, explaining that since the IHC had passed the impugned order while exercising jurisdiction under Section 32 of the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO), 1999, the remedy lay exclusively before the FCC under Section 32-A of the ordinance."
Framing: assertive ·
First seen: 2026-09-17 ·
Last seen: 2026-09-17 ·
Spread: 1 articles