"In this essay, I use ongoing litigation involving three pieces of state legislation—the IFA, a New Hampshire pedagogical gag law, and an Iowa book removal law—as jumping-off points to consider the public discourse in support of such laws, its connection to the government speech arguments made by the defendants in their respective litigations, and the dangers that these arguments reveal about an overly broad government speech doctrine."
Framing: assertive ·
First seen: 2026-09-15 ·
Last seen: 2026-09-15 ·
Spread: 1 articles