America’s top diplomat in Ottawa appears to be conflating public diplomacy with “foreign interference” as the Republicans brace for what polls suggest could be a bruising in the U.S. midterms.
uncertain
polls → appear → midterms
The U.S. Embassy in Ottawa issued a list of nine “facts” Wednesday that it claims demonstrate that Canadian politicians — mostly Industry Minister Melanie Joly and Ontario Premier Doug Ford — have been attempting to “influence” American politics.
uncertain
politicians → issue → politics
However, experts were quick to note there are key differences between influence, who is a standard part of diplomatic relations, and interference, which is typically done covertly and with hostile intent.
asserted
which → note → intent
All nine of the facts were drawn from public statements, media coverage, official government documents, even Ontario’s anti-tariff advertising campaign.
asserted
nine → draw → statements
Most had to do with Canada’s opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump’s unilateral trade war and tariffs.
asserted
Most → have → war
The embassy conflated those public activities with “potential interference in U.S. elections” on the eve of next month’s midterm elections.
asserted
embassy → conflate → elections
An Ipsos poll for Reuters released Tuesday suggested Trump’s approval rating was down to 31 per cent — a historic low — and that 47 per cent of registered voters wanted the Democrats to control Congress, to just 35 per cent who preferred Republican control.
uncertain
who → release → control
“The Canadian government brushes off concerns about potential interference in U.S. elections, even as its ministers and premiers openly describe plans to influence American politics in official documents and public appearances,” the embassy wrote in admonishment.
“All Canadians should refrain from attempting to participate in or influence U.S. elections in any way.
asserted
Canadians → brush → way
Americans decide America’s elections.
asserted
Americans → decide → elections
Get daily National news
Public officials publicly commenting on another country’s policies or decisions is not typically considered “foreign interference” under Canadian or American law.
asserted
officials → get → law
Trump’s social media account — or U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra’s retweets of his boss — demonstrate that it happens all the time.
asserted
it → demonstrate → boss
“In Canadian law, foreign influence that is a threat to the security of Canada … has to be covert or clandestine or involve a threat to a person,” West said in an interview.
asserted
West → have → interview
“None of those activities (listed by the U.S. Embassy) would meet that definition …
asserted
None → list → definition
Is it attempting to influence elected officials?
asserted
it → attempt → officials
But that’s not what we call foreign influenced activities that would be a threat or a crime in Canada.
asserted
that → ’ → Canada
It does not meet the threshold.”
asserted
It → meet → threshold
The activities detailed by the U.S. Embassy also don’t appear to fit the definition of foreign interference in American law.
asserted
activities → detail → law
The U.S.-based legal think tank Brennan Centre noted the federal government distinguishes between election interference — “degrading or disrupting the ability of election administrators and election workers to conduct free and fair elections” — and the murkier idea of foreign influence.
asserted
government → note → influence
“Foreign influence (can refer to) a myriad of activities by foreign governments or their agents to sway the participants in elections, including candidates and voters,” wrote Lawrence Nordon and Kate Lurie.
asserted
Nordon → refer → candidates
“Under the First Amendment, the government cannot limit Americans’ free speech or access to information, regardless of the source.
asserted
government → limit → source
However, it can expose the foreign source of the information when the intelligence is available and, in some cases, indict foreign actors for otherwise breaking U.S. law, such as hiding their role in sowing false election narratives and laundering money to sidestep U.S. sanctions.”
asserted
intelligence → expose → sanctions
In other words, an Ontario government-branded advertising campaign encouraging Trump to abandon his tariff crusade is unlikely to qualify as covert foreign interference since its funding and the person or government that commissioned it is clearly identified.
asserted
that → brand → it
Speaking to reporters Thursday, Joly said the U.S. Embassy neglected to point out that she met with Republicans as well as Democrats on various trips to the country.
asserted
she → speak → country
“That is diplomacy, that’s what we do,” Joly said.
asserted
Joly → ’ → what
“Now, the American administration decided to put tariffs on the world, including on Canada.
asserted
administration → decide → Canada
And that is hurting people on both sides of the border.
asserted
that → hurt → border
And that’s a problem that they need to address.
asserted
they → ’ → that
Meanwhile, we’ll do our work.”
asserted
we → do → work
West wondered who the target audience for the U.S. Embassy’s warning was — given both the Canadian and U.S. governments are likely to know that public advocacy isn’t the same thing as covert interference, and that it’s unlikely to change Canadian politicians’ behaviour.
asserted
it → wonder → behaviour
John Manley, the former deputy prime minister and foreign affairs minister, had an even more pointed question.
asserted
Manley → have → question
“Why is the ambassador wasting his time on this?
asserted
ambassador → waste → this
Doesn’t he have anything constructive to do?,” Manley said in in interview with Global News.
asserted
Manley → have → News
The Aporia
