Pennsylvania lawmakers on Wednesday sent a bill to Gov. Josh Shapiro’s desk that closes a loophole in a key government transparency law.
asserted
that → send → law
The law, known as Pennsylvania’s Sunshine Act, requires local and state government bodies, including school boards and municipal councils, to publicize their voting agendas 24 hours in advance of public meetings.
asserted
law → know → meetings
The idea is that the more people know about what their government is voting on, the better positioned they are to have a voice in the decision-making process.
asserted
they → know → process
But a state Supreme Court decision late last year expanded the limited list of exceptions governments can use to circumvent the 24-hour notice requirement and tack on last-minute items to their meeting agendas.
asserted
governments → expand → agendas
Good-government advocates almost immediately warned the ruling could lead to government bodies sneaking in votes on potentially thorny or unpopular issues.
uncertain
bodies → warn → issues
The bill, authored by state Sens. Patrick Stefano (R., Fayette) and Jarrett Coleman (R., Lehigh) and headed to Shapiro for his signature, both clarifies and claws back exceptions to the 24-hour rule.
asserted
bill → author → rule
It unanimously passed the state Senate in June and cleared the House 182-21 on Wednesday, which will likely be the last formal voting day of the two-year session.
asserted
which → pass → session
A spokesperson for the governor said he intends to sign it.
asserted
he → say → it
The Sunshine Act, as it is currently written, allows exceptions to the 24-hour notice requirement for emergency matters; last-minute but “de minimus” issues; and matters a resident or taxpayer raises during a public meeting that require an on-the-spot vote or a referral to staff.
asserted
that → write → staff
There is an apparent fourth exception referenced in the law that caused the disagreement that led to the high court’s decision: A government board can add a last-minute item to the agenda for discussion by a simple majority vote.
asserted
board → be → vote
A school board in Lehigh County used that language in 2021 to add a last-minute item to its voting agenda and ratify a teachers’ union contract.
asserted
board → use → contract
At the time, Coleman sued, arguing the clause was not intended to be a standalone exception, and instead must be viewed as coming into play if one of the other exceptions applies.
asserted
one → sue → exceptions
The state Supreme Court disagreed.
asserted
Court → disagree → ?
The Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association, which supported closing the loophole, said it’s aware of one instance involving controversy over the 24-hour rule since the decision.
asserted
it → support → decision
In December, the Greater Latrobe School Board in suburban Pittsburgh voted to hire a new solicitor.
asserted
Board → vote → solicitor
The item to hire a new solicitor was publicized in a meeting agenda 24 hours in advance, but certain key details were not included in the description.
asserted
details → hire → description
Stefano and Coleman’s bill clarifies that the majority-vote clause is a procedural tactic, rather than a standalone exception.
asserted
clause → clarify → ?
A similar bill was introduced by state Rep. Robert Freeman (D., Northampton).
asserted
bill → introduce → Freeman
In addition to closing the loophole, it would have added a new exception allowing for votes on minor and specific administrative matters (such as some permit approvals and low-cost municipal repairs) if delaying a vote would create undue hardship.
asserted
delaying → close → hardship
In an interview this week, Freeman said he made his bill more expansive because groups representing townships and counties raised concerns that local jurisdictions would be hampered when carrying out legitimate business.
asserted
jurisdictions → say → business
He said he wanted to give those groups more flexibility while upholding the spirit of the Sunshine Act and its goal of increasing voter participation in government.
asserted
he → say → government
Freeman said he believes his proposal was the better of the two, but he supports closing what could have been a dangerous loophole — particularly as municipalities around the state are considering difficult issues, such as whether to allow data centers to operate within their borders.
uncertain
centers → say → borders
“This,” he said of the legislative effort to clarify the law, “is designed to build accountability.”
asserted
he → say → accountability
In a statement Wednesday, Coleman echoed the sentiment.
asserted
Coleman → echo → sentiment
“Transparency only works when the public can see what’s coming,” he said, adding: “Today’s … vote sends a clear message that Pennsylvanians deserve notice before their local governments act on consequential matters, not after.”
___
asserted
governments → work → matters