Homeowner forced to remove fence from his own land after planners say it is too 'overbearing' for walkers using nearby public footpath

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Lawley, S. (2026, October 21). Homeowner forced to remove fence from his own land after planners say it is too 'overbearing' for walkers using nearby public footpath. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16226505/Homeowner-remove-fence-planners-walkers-footpath.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-21 · by Sam Lawley

Quick Summary

In Chichester, West Sussex, Giles Savage, who recently moved into a £635,000 home on the East Broyle estate, faced an unexpected conflict when he replaced and relocated his garden fence to enclose his property better. After spending thousands of pounds on the new 26-foot wooden barrier in August 2025, Mr. Savage was ordered by local planners to remove it because they deemed it "overbearing" for pedestrians using a nearby public footpath. Despite support from most neighbors and initial legal advice that no planning permission was needed, his appeal to the Planning Inspectorate failed when the body ruled against him in May 2025.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-21, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In October 2026, Giles Savage faced a setback when planning authorities ordered him to remove or relocate a fence he had built around his £635,000 home in East Broyle, Chichester, West Sussex. Despite owning the land where the fence was constructed, the Chichester District Council (CDC) ruled that it was too "overbearing" for walkers using a nearby public footpath and denied Mr. Savage's application for retrospective permission in May 2026. The fence, which he moved in August 2025 to enclose his garden by up to 8 meters, originally aimed to improve the appearance of his property after purchasing it four months prior. Neighbors supported the initial project, but local regulations dating back to the 1960s required him to alter or demolish the fence due to its impact on public pathways.

Written for “Planners Order Fence Removal” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 97746: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-21

Story

📰 Planners Order Fence Removal
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
6 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 6806 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sam Lawley
22 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Giles Savage thought that replacing and moving the 'derelict' fence around his £635,000 home would be a straightforward project.
🔮 It's every pet owner's worst nightmare – the gut-wrenching realisation your beloved companion has vanished and could now be miles away.
🔮 Police rushed to the scene of the shooting and arrived within seconds, witnesses said The shot shattered the calm of the early hours scene, which saw revellers on their way home and purchasing takeaways Police recovered a sawn-off shotgun from the scene in Angel Row, in the heart of the city A cordon was set up on Angel Row, near the Nottingham City Council building, as forensic officers attended the scene Assistant Chief Constable Claire Rukas, of Nottinghamshire Police, said the officer remains in hospital and a large police presence would be in place for the next few days.
🔮 Judge Parker KC said there was 'a very strong sexual element' to the offending, adding it would be 'wholly inappropriate' to suspend the sentence because Ward had shown no serious remorse and posed a serious risk. He added: 'There is no evidence whatsoever of remorse, regret or upset in the pre-sentence report.
🔮 It has been suggested that business rates could be slashed for thousands of small businesses in this month's Budget in a bid to revive flagging High Streets.
🔮 The attack looks set to increase tensions between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his American opposite number Mr Trump.
🔮 Volodymyr Zelensky has said he will hold elections if Vladimir Putin backs a 60-day ceasefire - but hit back at Donald Trump, insisting it is 'up to our people' to pick a leader.
🔮 The renewed conflict could reshape control in Yemen, with implications for Red Sea shipping lanes.
🔮 Dylan Cope, nine, suffered a burst appendix which led to a sepsis infection spreading through his body - and a coroner later ruled that had he been kept in hospital to have his appendix removed, 'his death would have been avoided'.
🔮 This has sparked widespread concerns among spies that sources, such as agents or informants operating in the field, could be identified through information that had been shared.
Also by Sam Lawley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 22 articles by Sam Lawley →

Topics

CDC Chichester Chichester District Council East Broyle West Sussex

Subjects

Savage PERSON · 8× CDC ORG · 2× Chichester GPE · 2× East Broyle GPE · 2× Giles Savage PERSON · 2× West Sussex GPE · 2× Chichester District Council ORG · 1× Richard Plowman PERSON · 1× the Planning Inspectorate ORG · 1×

Narrative

The project would have allowed Mr Savage, 36, to increase the size of his garden by up to eight metres and was a 'big part' of his decision to buy the property. But thanks to a 'very strange set of rules' which residents say date back to the 1960s, the local was told to move the fence back - or tear it down - despite owning the land.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-21
🔮 Giles Savage thought that replacing and moving the 'derelict' fence around his £635,000 home would be a straightforward project.

Claims (30 extracted, 6 hedged)

Giles Savage thought that replacing and moving the 'derelict' fence around his £635,000 home would be a straightforward project. asserted
replacing → think → home
But when neighbours told him he had been brave to put in a fresh wooden fence to enclose his property, alarm bells started ringing. asserted
bells → tell → property
Now planning chiefs have told him he has to tear down the 26ft barrier because it was too 'overbearing' for walkers using a nearby public footpath. asserted
it → tell → footpath
Mr Savage shifted the garden fence on the East Broyle estate in Chichester, West Sussex, in August 2025 - four months after moving. asserted
Savage → shift → August
He claims the existing structure was falling apart and he and his wife used climbing plants to cover the new boundary - with most neighbours allegedly in favour of it. uncertain
he → claim → it
The project would have allowed Mr Savage, 36, to increase the size of his garden by up to eight metres and was a 'big part' of his decision to buy the property. But thanks to a 'very strange set of rules' which residents say date back to the 1960s, the local was told to move the fence back - or tear it down - despite owning the land. asserted
local → allow → land
The homeowner in March applied for retrospective permission which was rejected by Chichester District Council (CDC) two months later. asserted
which → apply → Council
Giles Savage shifted his fence, pictured, closer to a path next to his £635,000 home on the East Broyle estate in Chichester, West Sussex in August 2025 It was previously eight metres further back, pictured, but Mr Savage believed he could extend it as it was on his land Commenting on the verdict, the local East Broyle Residents Association claimed that allowing the fence to go up would 'harm the character' of the estate. Mr Savage then took the dispute all the way to the Planning Inspectorate but the government body sided with the council, branding the structure 'overbearing'. uncertain
body → shift → structure
The homeowner, who works with off-shore yachts, spent thousands on the new fence after moving into the four-bed property with his wife and young children. asserted
who → work → wife
He said: 'We double-checked all the covenants, all the documents we had and we didn't see anything that meant we couldn't put the fence there. asserted
we → say → fence
Mr Savage - told by his solicitors he did not need planning permission - said he only realised something was wrong when neighbours said he was 'brave' for building it. asserted
he → tell → it
Months later, a representative from CDC said his fence could need planning permission thanks to conditions imposed on the estate when it was built in the 1960s. uncertain
it → say → 1960s
Rejecting Mr Savage's appeal, an inspector said in a ruling: 'Having seen the fencing in situ, it runs counter to the general ethos adopted across the estate in terms of means of enclosure and where they are positioned. asserted
they → reject → enclosure
It both reduces the sense of spaciousness and is a somewhat overbearing feature for pedestrians. asserted
It → reduce → pedestrians
The proposal would conflict with the development plan taken as a whole.' asserted
proposal → conflict → whole
Mr Savage said: 'It's just a shame really. asserted
It → say → ?
All of our neighbours have shown unwavering support for the fence. asserted
All → show → fence
'The old fence that was there was quite derelict - it had a lot of holes in it. asserted
it → have → it
'My wife loves gardening, she planted plants all up and down it – some climbing wisteria, it would climb up the fence to make a nice little border. asserted
it → love → border
We like to maintain our land and keep it as neat and tidy for anybody walking up and down. asserted
We → like → anybody
'If we have to move the fence back, we'll have to move the fence back – we'll have to do something to comply with the rules and regulations.' asserted
we → have → rules
Speaking after the appeal was refused, next door neighbour and resident of 40 years Richard Plowman, 77, claimed the new fence contravened 60-year-old rules. asserted
fence → speak → rules
He said: 'It's just very unfortunate in some respects. asserted
It → say → respects
Mr Savage never came and spoke to us – if he'd came and spoke to us, we could have alerted him to the problems with the amenity land and things, because it's been an issue for some time. uncertain
it → come → time
'I thought that the job that was done was good, but unfortunately it was against the planning permission that was originally given to the houses on the estate. asserted
that → think → estate
He added: 'The residents' association are looking at having a meeting with the local councillor to make sure we can put some clarification for the estate for new people coming in – because they find it quite confusing.' asserted
it → add → people
Commenting on the appeal, the local East Broyle Residents Association said allowing the fence to remain could 'set a precedent' for others to do the same thing. uncertain
others → comment → thing
The homeowner applied for retrospective permission which was rejected by Chichester District Council - before an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate was also turned down He claims the existing structure was 'derelict' and he and his wife improved the look of it Another local added that permitting the structure would 'open the floodgates to numerous similar applications which would be detrimental to the character and ambience the residents currently enjoy'. A council officer said: 'This matter concerns a change of use of land from open amenity space to garden, rather than just the installation of a fence. uncertain
matter → apply → fence
The piece of land in question had been an area of open amenity land for many years, and has added to the feeling of space and openness which is highly valued by residents in the area. asserted
which → add → area
The Planning Inspector upheld the council's decision to refuse permission to change the use of the land and the fencing enclosure that would result from it, for the same reasons, and agreed that it was not consistent with the way that the estate had originally been designed.' asserted
estate → uphold → way
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support