The Aporia
King, R. (2026, October 21). Supreme Court blocks Trump’s effort to restrict transgender treatment for prison inmates. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/21/us-news/supreme-court-blocks-trumps-effort-to-restrict-transgender-treatment-for-prison-inmates/
King, Ryan. “Supreme Court blocks Trump’s effort to restrict transgender treatment for prison inmates.” New York Post, 21 Oct. 2026, https://nypost.com/2026/10/21/us-news/supreme-court-blocks-trumps-effort-to-restrict-transgender-treatment-for-prison-inmates/.
King, Ryan. “Supreme Court blocks Trump’s effort to restrict transgender treatment for prison inmates.” New York Post, October 21, 2026. https://nypost.com/2026/10/21/us-news/supreme-court-blocks-trumps-effort-to-restrict-transgender-treatment-for-prison-inmates/.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
The Supreme Court rejected a Trump administration request on October 21, 2026, to enforce a policy restricting treatment for transgender inmates in federal prisons, including hormone therapy and social accommodations like wigs and makeup. The court’s decision allows a lower court injunction against the policy to remain in place. There are approximately 1,000 transgender inmates currently in federal custody. President Trump's broader efforts aim to roll back transgender rights by classifying gender identity under "immutable biological classification" of male or female. Senior staff attorney Li Nowlin-Sohl from the American Civil Liberties Union stated that more than 2,000 people in Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody identify as transgender. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, supporting the administration’s stance.
The Supreme Court rebuffed the Trump administration’s emergency petition to immediately revive its restrictions on transgender treatment for inmates in federal prisons on Wednesday.
President Trump’s team had requested the high court stay a lower court ruling blocking that policy from taking effect while litigation over it plays out, but the high court rejected it without explanation, which is standard practice for emergency applications.
Republican appointed Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas both would’ve granted Trump’s request for a stay on the lower court’s ruling against the Trump administration.